Validation of T classifications in the 7th edition UICC staging system and recommendation of a simplified T classifications based on intensity-modulated radiotherapy
黄 爽, 姜 锋, 陈媛媛. Validation of T classifications in the 7th edition UICC staging system and recommendation of a simplified T classifications based on intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J]. China Oncology, 2016, 26(12): 1012-1017.
黄 爽, 姜 锋, 陈媛媛. Validation of T classifications in the 7th edition UICC staging system and recommendation of a simplified T classifications based on intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J]. China Oncology, 2016, 26(12): 1012-1017. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2016.12.008.
背景与目的:调强放射治疗可以明显提高鼻咽癌的局部控制率,使T分期的预后价值发生改变。本文拟评价接受调强放射治疗的鼻咽癌患者国际抗癌联盟(Union for International Cancer Control,UICC)第7版分期中T分期的预后价值,并对其简化方式进行探讨。方法:回顾浙江省肿瘤医院放疗科2007年1月—2011年6月收治的641例初治鼻咽癌患者的基本资料,采用Kaplan-Meier法及COX回归评价UICC第7版分期中T分期的预后价值。结果:641例患者的5年总生存率(overall survival,OS)、无局部复发生存率(loco-relapse free survival,LRFS)、无进展生存率(progression-free survival,PFS)和无远处转移生存率(distant metastasis free survival,DMFS)分别为85.4%、88.5%、78%和87.1%,其中T
Background and purpose: The application of intensity-modulated radiothera
py (IMRT) has improved the local control rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma greatly
which changed the predictive value of T classifications of TNM staging system. This study aimed to validate the predictive effect of T classifications in the 7th Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging system and discuss the simplification of T classifications. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 641 primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients at our center from January 2007 to June 2011. We evaluated the predictive effect of T classifications by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS)
local relapse-free survival (LRFS)
progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) were 85.4%
88.5%
78% and 87.1%
respectively. The 5-year OS of T
1
T
2
T
3
and T
4
categories were 91.6%
85.3%
90.1% and 76.5%
respectively; LRFS were 93%
85.3%
91.5% and 84.4%; PFS were 88.2%
77.3%
80.8% and 70.9%; DMFS were 95.1%
88.9%
88.2% and 81.3%
respectively. The difference in survival curves between T
1
T
2
and T
3
were not significant (P0.05). However
several prognostic indexes were significantly different between T
4
and T
1
T
2
T
3
. We merged the T
1
T
2
and T
3
classifications as new T
1
and the T
4
classification as new T
2
. The 5-year OS of new T
1
and T
2
were 89.1% and 76.5% (P=0.001); LRFS were 90.1% and 84.4% (P=0.028); PFS were 81% and 70.9% (P=0.001); DMFS were 90.8% and 81.2% (P=0.002). The survival curves were substantially separated. The simplified T classifications had obvious advantages when separately analyzed in different N stages. Conclusion: In the era of IMRT
the predictive effect of T classifications of the 7th UICC staging system has diminished. The simplification of T classifications can fit with the new treatment and