
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 河北医科大学第四医院内镜科,河北 石家庄 050035
2. 河北医科大学第四医院消化内科,河北 石家庄 050035
[ "郑秀丽(ORCID: 0000-0001-9423-231X),博士,主治医师。" ]
[ "李胜棉,河北医科大学第四医院消化内科主任医师,教授,博士研究生导师。中国抗癌协会老年肿瘤专业委员会常务委员,亚太医学生物免疫学会肝病分会常务委员,中国临床肿瘤学会结直肠癌专家委员会委员,中国抗癌协会肿瘤支持治疗专业委员会委员,中国抗癌协会化疗专业委员会委员,中国医疗保健国际交流促进会消化道肿瘤多学科分会委员,中国中西医结合学会肝病学分会委员,河北省抗癌协会老年肿瘤专业委员会主任委员,河北省预防医学会消化疾病防控专业委员会主任委员,河北省女医师协会消化专业委员会主任委员。" ]
收稿:2022-06-20,
修回:2022-09-01,
纸质出版:2022-09-30
移动端阅览
郑秀丽, 姚志原, 吴明利, 等. 直肠神经内分泌肿瘤淋巴结转移的危险因素分析及内镜切除方式比较[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022,32(9):800-806.
Xiuli ZHENG, Zhiyuan YAO, Mingli WU, et al. Analysis of risk factors of lymph node metastasis and comparison of endoscopic resection methods in rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm[J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(9): 800-806.
郑秀丽, 姚志原, 吴明利, 等. 直肠神经内分泌肿瘤淋巴结转移的危险因素分析及内镜切除方式比较[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022,32(9):800-806. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.09.007.
Xiuli ZHENG, Zhiyuan YAO, Mingli WU, et al. Analysis of risk factors of lymph node metastasis and comparison of endoscopic resection methods in rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm[J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(9): 800-806. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.09.007.
背景与目的:
直肠神经内分泌肿瘤(rectal neuroendocrine neoplasm
R-NEN)的发病率呈上升趋势
但其治疗仍存在争议
特别是10 ~ 20 mm之间的肿瘤。本研究通过分析R-NEN的临床病理学特征
探讨其淋巴结转移的危险因素
并比较不同内镜切除效果的差异
探索内镜治疗R-NEN的适应证及方式。
方法:
回顾性分析2007年2月
&
#x02014;2020年12月河北医科大学第四医院收治的R-NEN患者的相关临床信息
分析淋巴结转移的危险因素
比较不同内镜切除方式的安全性和有效性。
结果:
共分析了190例R-NEN患者的临床病理学特征
结果显示
肿瘤大小
&
#x02265;12.5 mm(OR = 69.081
95% CI:11.385 ~ 419.155
P
<
0.001)和淋巴管血管侵犯(OR = 11.732
95% CI:1.028 ~ 84.567
P
= 0.015)是淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。比较内镜下套帽辅助黏膜切除术(endoscopic mucosal resection with cap
EMR-c)和内镜下黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection
ESD)治疗114例R-NEN患者的临床资料
结果显示
EMR-c组的手术时间明显短于ESD组[(10.23
&
#x000b1;1.99)min
vs
(24.78
&
#x000b1;8.09)min
P
<
0.001
]
。两组的内镜整块切除率、病理学完全切除率和并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论:
肿瘤大小
&
#x02265;12.5 mm和淋巴管血管侵犯是R-NEN患者淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。对于
<
12.5 mm且无淋巴结转移的R-NEN来说
EMR-c和ESD均是安全有效的治疗方法。
Background and purpose:
In recent years
the incidence of rectal neuro
endocrine neoplasm (R-NEN) has been on the rise. However
its treatment remains controversial
especially for tumors of 10-20 mm in diameter. In this study
the clinicopathological characteristics of R-NEN were analyzed
the risk factors for lymph node metastasis were discussed
and the effects of different endoscopic resection were compared
so as to ascertain the indications and methods of endoscopic treatment of R-NEN.
Methods:
Clinical data of patients with R-NEN treated in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from February 2007 to December 2020 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors of lymph node metastasis were analyzed
and the safety and effectiveness of different endoscopic resection methods were compared.
Results:
The clinicopathological features of 190 patients with R-NEN were analyzed
suggesting that tumor size
&
#x02265;12.5 mm (OR = 69.081
95% CI: 11.385-419.155
P
<
0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (OR = 11.732
95% CI: 1.028-84.567
P
= 0.015) were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. The clinical data of 114 patients with R-NEN treated with endoscopic mucosal resection with cap (EMR-c) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) respectively were compared. The results showed that the duration of operation was significantly shorter in EMR-c group than in ESD group [(10.23
&
#x000b1;1.99) min
vs
(24.78
&
#x000b1;8.09) min
P
<
0.001
]
. There was no significant difference in rate of endoscopic en bloc resection
pathological complete resection rate and complication rate between the two groups (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion:
Tumor size
&
#x02265;12.5 mm in diameter and presence of lymphovascular invasion are independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with R-NEN. Both EMR-c and ESD are safe and effective treatments for R-NEN of
<
12.5 mm in diameter and without lymph node metastasis.
FOLKERT I W , SINNAMON A J , CONCORS S J , et al . Grade is a dominant risk factor for metastasis in patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2020 , 27 ( 3 ): 855 - 863 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07848-0 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07848-0
FAN J H , ZHANG Y Q , SHI S S , et al . A nation-wide retrospective epidemiological study of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in China [J ] . Oncotarget , 2017 , 8 ( 42 ): 71699 - 71708 . DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17599 http://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17599 https://www.oncotarget.com/lookup/doi/10.18632/oncotarget.17599 https://www.oncotarget.com/lookup/doi/10.18632/oncotarget.17599
WOOD D E . National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines for lung cancer screening [J ] . Thorac Surg Clin , 2015 , 25 ( 2 ): 185 - 197 . DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.12.003 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.12.003
AL-SUKHNI E , MILOT L , FRUITMAN M , et al . Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2012 , 19 ( 7 ): 2212 - 2223 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5 http://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5 http://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5
NAGTEGAAL I D , ODZE R D , KLIMSTRA D , et al . The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system [J ] . Histopathology , 2020 , 76 ( 2 ): 182 - 188 . DOI: 10.1111/his.13975 http://doi.org/10.1111/his.13975
GLEESON F C , LEVY M J , DOZOIS E J , et al . Endoscopically identified well-differentiated rectal carcinoid tumors: impact of tumor size on the natural history and outcomes [J ] . Gastrointest Endosc , 2014 , 80 ( 1 ): 144 - 151 . DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.031 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.11.031
MODLIN I M , LYE K D , KIDD M . A 5-decade analysis of 13, 715 carcinoid tumors [J ] . Cancer , 2003 , 97 ( 4 ): 934 - 959 . DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11105 http://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11105 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.11105 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.11105
DUAN X L , ZHAO M , ZHANG S L , et al . Effects of tumor distance from anal verge on survival outcomes for rectal NENs and lymphatic metastasis risk score for colorectal NENs [J ] . Int J Colorectal Dis , 2020 , 35 ( 7 ): 1255 - 1264 . DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03596-w http://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03596-w
SHIM K N , YANG S K , MYUNG S J , et al . Atypical endoscopic features of rectal carcinoids [J ] . Endoscopy , 2004 , 36 ( 4 ): 313 - 316 .
KONISHI T , WATANABE T , KISHIMOTO J , et al . Prognosis and risk factors of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids: results of a nationwide registry over 15 years [J ] . Gut , 2007 , 56 ( 6 ): 863 - 868 .
AHMED Y , OTHMAN M . EMR/ESD: techniques, complications, and evidence [J ] . Curr Gastroenterol Rep , 2020 , 22 ( 8 ): 39 . DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00777-z http://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00777-z
D&#x00104;BKOWSKI K , RUSINIAK-ROSSI&#x00143;SKA N , MICHALSKA K , et al . Endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors in a 13-year retrospective single-center study: are we following the guidelines? [J ] . Pol Arch Intern Med , 2021 , 131 ( 3 ): 241 - 248 .
YANG D H , PARK Y , PARK S H , et al . Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos) [J ] . Gastrointest Endosc , 2016 , 83 ( 5 ): 1015 - 1022 ;quiz1023-.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.046 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.046 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016510715029612 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016510715029612
CHA J H , JUNG D H , KIM J H , et al . Long-term outcomes according to additional treatments after endoscopic resection for rectal small neuroendocrine tumors [J ] . Sci Rep , 2019 , 9 ( 1 ): 4911 . DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40668-6 http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40668-6
0
浏览量
2296
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621