基于模体的乳腺X线摄影质量控制中SNR变异系数的分析

沈茜刚; 柴青焕; 姜婷婷; 沈悦; 肖勤; 顾雅佳

doi:10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.08.007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于模体的乳腺X线摄影质量控制中SNR变异系数的分析

论著 | 更新时间：2025-12-31

- 基于模体的乳腺X线摄影质量控制中SNR变异系数的分析
- Analysis of variation coefficient of SNR in phantom-based mammography quality control
- 中国癌症杂志 2025年35卷第8期页码：784-791
- 作者机构：
  
  复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科，复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系，上海 200032
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "沈茜刚（ORCID: 0000-0001-6460-3474），硕士，副主任技师。" ]
  顾雅佳（ORCID: 0000-0002-6130-859X），博士，主任医师，复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科主任。
- 基金信息：
  
  吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.2022-11-24)
- DOI：10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.08.007
  中图分类号： R737.9
- 收稿：2024-10-24，
  
  修回：2025-03-19，
  
  纸质出版：2025-08-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
沈茜刚, 柴青焕, 姜婷婷, 等. 基于模体的乳腺X线摄影质量控制中SNR变异系数的分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025,35(8):784-791.

Xigang SHEN, Qinghuan CHAI, Tingting JIANG, et al. Analysis of variation coefficient of SNR in phantom-based mammography quality control[J]. China Oncology, 2025, 35(8): 784-791.
沈茜刚, 柴青焕, 姜婷婷, 等. 基于模体的乳腺X线摄影质量控制中SNR变异系数的分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025,35(8):784-791. DOI： 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.08.007.

Xigang SHEN, Qinghuan CHAI, Tingting JIANG, et al. Analysis of variation coefficient of SNR in phantom-based mammography quality control[J]. China Oncology, 2025, 35(8): 784-791. DOI： 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.08.007.

摘要

背景与目的：

在乳腺X线摄影质量控制中，信噪比（signal-to-noise ratio，SNR）是指图像中有用的信号强度与背景噪声的比值，是衡量图像质量好坏的重要指标之一。变异系数是描述SNR一致性和可重复性的常用指标。本研究通过分析不同厂家的3台乳腺X线摄影设备在不同曝光模式下的二维图像和X线断层摄影（tomography，Tomo）图像（简称断层图像）中SNR变异系数的变化情况，旨在评估乳腺X线摄影设备性能的稳定性和可重复性。

方法：

选用乳腺X线摄影质量控制专用的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯模体（polymethylmethacrylate phantom，PMMA），分别在全数字化乳腺X线摄影（full-field digital mammography，FFDM）、低剂量乳腺X线摄影和数字乳腺断层摄影（digital breast tomosynthesis，DBT）3种曝光模式下行PMMA厚度从20~80 mm，实际压迫厚度等效于乳腺平均密度的压迫厚度21~103 mm的自动曝光检测。计算不同乳腺X线摄影设备在不同曝光模式、不同压迫厚度时二维图像和断层图像中SNR的变异系数变化情况。

结果：

在FFDM、低剂量乳腺X线摄影、DBT曝光模式下，等效于乳腺平均密度的压迫厚度21~103 mm时，分析乳腺X线摄影设备1、2、3在不同曝光模式下二维图像的SNR变异系数间的差异，仅DBT曝光模式下不同设备间的二维图像差异有统计学意义（

=0.003），设备1、2、3中二维图像的SNR变异系数分别为0.188%~0.720%、0.368%~1.073%和0.402%~1.662%。FFDM和低剂量曝光模式下设备1、2、3中二维图像的SNR变异系数差异均无统计学意义（

=0.060）。在DBT曝光模式时不同乳腺X线摄影设备的断层第一张投影图和0°投影图的SNR变异系数变化范围在设备1（2种角度）、2、3中差异均无统计学意义（

=0.373，

=0.742，

=0.225，

=0.693）。

结论：

不同乳腺X线摄影设备、不同曝光模式时二维图像和断层图像的SNR变异系数变化范围各不相同，没有固定和标准的数值，但都在乳腺X线摄影设备质量控制要求范围内。在FFDM和低剂量曝光模式时乳腺X线摄影设备二维图像的稳定性、可重复性更好；在DBT曝光模式时断层第一张投影图和0°投影图的变异系数值差异无统计学意义，均显示设备的稳定性良好。

Abstract

Background and purpose:

In the quality control of mammography

the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) refers to the ratio of the useful signal intensity to the background noise in the image

which is one of the important indicators for measuring the quality of the image. The coefficient of variation (CoV) is a commonly used indicator to describe the consistency and repeatability of SNR. This study aimed to assess the stability and repeatability of mammographic device performance by analyzing the changes in SNR CoV in two-dimensional (2D) images and tomosynthesis images (referred to as Tomo images) under different exposure modes using three mammographic devices from different manufacturers.

Methods:

A polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom designed for mammography quality control was used to perform automatic exposure detection at PMMA thicknesses ranging from 20-80 mm

with actual compression thickness equivalent to the average density of the breast compressed to 21-103 mm under full-field digital mammography (FFDM)

low-dose mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exposure modes. The CoV of SNR in 2D images and tomosynthesis images was calculated for different mammographic devices under different exposure modes and compression thicknesses.

Results:

Between the compression thicknesses equivalent to the average density of the breast from 21 mm to 103 mm under FFDM

low-dose mammography

and DBT exposure modes

the differences in SNR CoV of 2D images under different exposure modes among mammographic devices 1

and 3 were statistically significant only in the DBT exposure mode (

=0.003)

with SNR CoV ranging from 0.188% to 0.720%

0.368% to 1.073% and 0.402% to 1.662%

respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in SNR CoV of 2D images among devices 1

and 3 under FFDM and low-dose exposure modes (

=0.060). Under the DBT exposure mode

there were no statistically significant differences in the SNR CoV of the first projection image and the 0° projection image of tomosynthesis among devices 1 (2 angles)

and 3 (

=0.373

=0.742

=0.225

=0.693

respectively).

Conclusion:

The SNR CoV in 2D images and tomosynthesis images varies under different mammographic devices and exposure modes

with no fixed or standard values

but all within the required range for mammographic device quality control. The stability and repeatability of 2D images of mammographic devices are better under FFDM and low-dose exposure modes; the SNR CoV values of the first projection image and the 0° projection image of tomosynthesis under the DBT exposure m

ode show no statistical differences

indicating good stability of the devices.

关键词

Keywords

references

郑荣寿 , 陈茹 , 韩冰峰 , 等 . 2022年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析 [J ] . 中华肿瘤杂志 , 2024 , 46 ( 3 ): 221 - 231 .

ZHENG R S , CHEN R , HAN B F , et al . Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022 [J ] . Chin J Oncol , 2024 , 46 ( 3 ): 221 - 231 .

HELVIE M A , BEVERS T B . Screening mammography for average-risk women: the controversy and NCCN’s position [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2018 , 16 ( 11 ): 1398 - 1404 .

ALAWAJI Z , TAVAKOLI TABA S , RAE W . Automated image quality assessment of mammography phantoms: a systematic review [J ] . Acta Radiol , 2023 , 64 ( 3 ): 971 - 986 .

MORRISON C K , MACDONALD E B , BEVINS N B . Variations in signal-to-noise characteristics of tissue-equivalent attenuators for mammographic automatic exposure control system performance evaluation [J ] . J Appl Clin Med Phys , 2023 , 24 ( 2 ): e13870 .

中华人民共和国医药行业标准《乳腺X射线机专用技术条件》 [EB/OL ] . 2017 . https://www.lmti.cn/lmti/xwdt/tzgg/2025022114543661364/2025022114531287865.pdf. https://www.lmti.cn/lmti/xwdt/tzgg/2025022114543661364/2025022114531287865.pdf https://www.lmti.cn/lmti/xwdt/tzgg/2025022114543661364/2025022114531287865.pdf

European Union . European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, Fourth edition-Supplements [EB/OL ] 2013. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4e74ee9b-df80-4c91-a5fb-85efb0fdda2b#. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4e74ee9b-df80-4c91-a5fb-85efb0fdda2b# https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4e74ee9b-df80-4c91-a5fb-85efb0fdda2b#

International Standard Norme Internationale . Evaluation and routine testing in medical imaging departments-Part 3-6: Acceptance and constancy tests-Imaging performance of mammographic X-ray equipment used in a mammographic tomosynthesis mode of operation [EB/OL ] . IEC 61223-3-6, Edition 1.0 2020 - 02 : 21. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/100363/8a81efd2bc784897a0858244d7ad6f6e/IEC-61223-3-6-2020.pdf. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/100363/8a81efd2bc784897a0858244d7ad6f6e/IEC-61223-3-6-2020.pdf https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/100363/8a81efd2bc784897a0858244d7ad6f6e/IEC-61223-3-6-2020.pdf

MANGUSSI A D , PIANOSCHI T A , CECCHETTO B , et al . AQMI: software for assessing the quality of mammographic images [J ] . Braz J Rad Sci , 2023 , 11 ( 3 ): 1 - 16 .

GROMANN L B , BEQUÉ D , SCHERER K , et al . Low-dose, phase-contrast mammography with high signal-to-noise ratio [J ] . Biomed Opt Express , 2016 , 7 ( 2 ): 381 - 391 . DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.000381 http://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.000381

张原生 , 王晓成 , 郭子泉 , 等 . 数字乳腺X射线摄影中管电流量优化的实验研究 [J ] . 中华放射医学与防护杂志 , 2022 ( 2 ): 144 - 149 .

ZHANG Y S , WANG X C , GUO Z Q , et al . Experimental study on optimization of mAs in digital mammography [J ] . Chin J Radiol Med Prot , 2022 ( 2 ): 144 - 149 .

康天良 , 牛延涛 , 刘云福 , 等 . 数字乳腺X线摄影中采用影像噪声特征评价图像质量的研究 [J ] . 中华放射学杂志 , 2012 , 46 ( 10 ): 932 - 936 .

KANG T L , NIU Y T , LIU Y F , et al . Research of using image noise characteristic to evaluation image quality in digital mammography [J ] . Chin J Radiol , 2012 , 46 ( 10 ): 932 - 936 .

赵红兰 , 马红 , 路欣 , 等 . 不同管电压对乳腺数字X线摄影辐射剂量和图像质量的影响 [J ] . 中华放射学杂志 , 2013 , 47 ( 10 ): 921 - 925 .

ZHAO H L , MA H , LU X , et al . Influences of different tube voltages on the dose and image quality of a full field digital mammography [J ] . Chin J Radiol , 2013 , 47 ( 10 ): 921 - 925 .

WILLIAMS M B , RAGHUNATHAN P , MORE M J , et al . Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography [J ] . Med Phys , 2008 , 35 ( 6 ): 2414 - 2423 . DOI: 10.1118/1.2912177 http://doi.org/10.1118/1.2912177

CUNHA D M , TOMAL A , POLETTI M E . Optimization of X-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations [J ] . Phys Med Biol , 2012 , 57 ( 7 ): 1919 - 1935 . DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1919 http://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1919

林袁碧 , 徐维敏 , 秦耿耿 , 等 . 乳腺X线不同曝光模式的图像质量对比 [J ] . 分子影像学杂志 , 2024 , 47 ( 3 ): 311 - 314 .

LIN Y B , XU W M , QIN G G , et al . Comparation of image quality in the different exposure modes of mammography [J ] . J Mol Imag , 2024 , 47 ( 3 ): 311 - 314 .

浏览量

434

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

甲状腺CT辐射剂量、图像质量与女性体成分的相关性研究

肿瘤类器官诊治平台的质量控制标准中国专家共识（2022年版）

乳腺X线摄影影像学特征与21基因检测复发风险评分的相关性影像基因组学研究

数字乳腺断层摄影技术中大、小角度曝光的辐射剂量比较