中国癌症杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 161-167.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2016.02.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

PET-CT用于评价食管鳞癌放疗中18F-FDG高摄取区域的空间动态变化的前瞻性研究

刘 琪1,余 雯2,蔡旭伟1,朱正飞1,傅小龙1,2   

  1. 1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射治疗中心,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032 ;
    2. 上海交通大学附属胸科医院放疗科,上海200030
  • 出版日期:2016-02-29 发布日期:2016-06-01
  • 通信作者: 傅小龙 E-mail:xlfu1964@hotmail.com

Spatial dynamic distribution and stability of 18F-FDG uptake locations within primary tumor during radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

LIU Qi1, YU Wen2, CAI Xuwei1, ZHU Zhengfei1, FU Xiaolong1,2   

  1. 1.Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; 2.Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Chest Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China
  • Published:2016-02-29 Online:2016-06-01
  • Contact: FU Xiaolong E-mail: xlfu1964@hotmail.com

摘要: 背景与目的:放疗为食管癌重要的治疗方式之一,但疗效并不理想。目前认为肿瘤在PET-CT上高摄取的区域可能与放射抵抗有关。本文通过观察放疗前和放疗中两次PET-CT所显示的食管原发病灶18F-FDG高摄取区域的空间位置关系,从而推测依据放疗前的PET图像上所显示的食管癌原发灶高18F-FDG摄取的信息进行区域选择性加量放疗的可行性。方法:入组2011—2013年在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科接受同步放化疗治疗的初治食管鳞癌患者。所有患者在放疗前和放疗40 Gy时(第2次同步化疗前)分别行18F-FDG PET-CT扫描。在第1次PET图像上原发灶勾画首先以标准摄取值(standard uptake value,SUV)=2.5、5和40%~70%SUVmax-pre为阈值在PET图像上自动勾画得到大体肿瘤体积(gross tumor volume,GTV)2.5pre、GTV5pre、GTV40%pre、GTV50%pre、GTV60%pre和GTV70%pre。在第2次PET图像上,以SUV=2.5和70%~90%SUVmax-dur为阈值勾画得到GTV2.5dur、GTV70%dur、GTV80%dur和GTV90%dur。计算两次PET图像上以阈值自动勾画的区域的空间交集分数(overlap fraction,OF),即两个感兴趣区(region of interest,ROI)的交集的体积与两个ROI相对较小的体积的比值。结果:共入组22例患者。所有患者的原发灶SUVmax、SUVmean均有显著下降(P=0.003和P<0.0001)。残留高摄取区域与治疗前GTV50%pre的OF达到70%以上,其中热点区域GTV90%dur完全处于原发灶的高摄取区域内,OF达到100%。以不同阈值勾画的体积有很大差异,而放疗前和放疗中的食管癌原发灶高代谢区域尽管体积变化很大,但空间位置保持相对的稳定。结论:放疗中食管鳞癌原发灶的SUV显著下降,但食管癌原发灶残留的18F-FDG高摄取区域仍然较稳定的落在治疗前原发灶GTV及治疗前PET上所显示的18F-FDG高摄取区域内,提示依据治疗前PET图像来选择性对食管癌原发病灶的部分区域进行局部加量放疗是可行的。

关键词: 食管癌, 放疗, PET-CT

Abstract: Background and purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the most important therapeutic tools for esophageal cancer. Because tumors are heterogeneous, including for 18F-FDG uptake and, most likely, for radioresistance, selective boosting of high FDG uptake zones within the tumor has been suggested. Therefore, it is critical to know whether the location of these high FDG uptake patterns within the tumor remains stable during RT. Methods: Twenty-two patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemo-radiation underwent repeated 18F-FDG PET-CT scans before RT and after 20 fractions of RT. On all scans, the high and low FDG uptake regions were auto-delineated using several standard uptake value (SUV) thresholds, varying from 40% to 70% of SUVmax on the pretreatment scan [gross tumor volume (GTV)40%pre, GTV50%pre, GTV60%pre, GTV70%pre] and from 70% to 90% of SUVmax on the dur-treatment scan (GTV70%dur, GTV80%dur, GTV90%dur) and fixed thresholds of 2.5 and 5 (GTV2.5pre, GTV5pre). The volumes and overlap fractions (OF) of these delineations were calculated to demonstrate the stability of the high FDG uptake regions during RT. Results: The high uptake regions within the tumor during RT largely corresponded (OF>70%) with the 50% SUVmax high FDG uptake area (GTV50%pre) of the pretreatment scan. The hotspot within the residual area (GTV90%dur) was completely within the GTV and pre-radiotherapy high uptake regions (OF=100%). Although the location of the high FDG uptake patterns within the tumor during RT remained stable, the delineated volumes varied markedly. Conclusion: The location of the high FDG uptake areas within the tumor remained stable during RT. This knowledge may enable selective boosting of high FDG uptake areas within the tumor.

Key words: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Radiotherapy, PET-CT