中国癌症杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 257-262.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2016.03.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

磁共振表观弥散系数对肝癌TACE疗效的预测价值

杨 欢1,袁 正2,李文涛1,许立超1,王 英1   

  1. 1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院介入科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032 ;
    2. 中国人民解放军第85 医院影像科,上海 200052
  • 出版日期:2016-03-30 发布日期:2016-06-13
  • 通信作者: 李文涛 E-mail:liwentao98@126.com

Role of the apparent diffusion coefficient of MRI in evaluating therapeutic efficacy after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatic cancer patients

YANG Huan1, YUAN Zheng2, LI Wentao1, XU Lichao1, WANG Yin1   

  1. 1.Department of Interventional Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; 2. Department of Radiology, PLA 85th Hospital, Shanghai 200052, China
  • Published:2016-03-30 Online:2016-06-13
  • Contact: LI Wentao E-mail: liwentao98@126.com

摘要: 背景与目的:肝癌患者经导管动脉化疗栓塞(transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,TACE)后早期疗效评价仍是临床难点。该研究旨在探讨表观弥散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)对肝癌患者TACE术后疾病早期进展的预测效能。方法:本研究经伦理委员会批准,所有患者均被充分告知。共入组23例肝癌患者(男性14例,女性9例,年龄21~85岁,平均年龄53.3岁),所有患者术前及术后1个月分别行MRI检查和弥散加权成像(diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)检察(b=50、500、1 000 mm2/s)。术后3个月行MRI增强扫描检查,根据RECIST 1.1标准,把患者分为进展组和非进展组。采用配对t检验比较进展组、非进展组术前及术后1个月ADC值变化。采用非配对t检验比较进展组与非进展组之间的相关ADC参数。在23例肝癌患者中,采用受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC),确定一个鉴别进展和非进展的ADC变化率(ADC%)阈值。结果:14例肝癌患者出现进展,9例肝癌患者未进展。未进展组术后1个月肿瘤ADC值明显升高,与术前肿瘤ADC值之间差异有统计学意义(P=0.01)。进展组术前、术后1个月肿瘤ADC无明显变化(P=0.221)。进展组与非进展组术前肿瘤ADC、ADC%之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肝癌患者中,未进展组肿瘤ADC%显著高于进展组(P=0.029),用ROC分析ADC%区分进展组与非进展组的能力,以-6.455%为阈值(95%CI:0.643~1.000),曲线下面积为0.867,此时敏感度为100%,特异度为66.7%。结论:术后1个月肿瘤ADC值仅在未进展组明显增高。对于肝癌患者,ADC%能够有效预测患者经TACE治疗后是否早期发生疾病进展。

关键词: 弥散加权成像, 肝肿瘤, 经导管动脉化疗栓塞术, 随访, 表观弥散系数, 进展

Abstract: Background and purpose: Early evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatic cancer is still a difficult clinical problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to help predict early disease progression after TACE. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and all patients signed informed consent. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b=50, 500, 1 000 mm2/s) were performed before and 1 month after initiating TACE for 23 patients with hepatic cancer (14 were male, 9 were female; mean age: 53.3 years; range: 21-85 years). Contrast-enhanced MRI was performed 3 months after initiating TACE. Patients were classified as either progressing or non-progressing according to RECIST 1.1. The preoperative ADC values of tumor and the ADC values of tumor 1 month after TACE were analyzed by paired t-test in both progressing and non-progressing group. Unpaired t-test was used to compare ADC parameters between progressing and non-progressing group. In all the 23 hepatic cancer patients, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine a threshold ADC ratio (ADC%) to differentiate progressing from non-progressing patients. Results: Thirteen progressing and 9 non-progressing patients were evaluated. Increase in ADCs of tumor was observed in non-progressing patients at 1 month after TACE compared with preoperative ADCs. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.01). In progressing group, preoperative ADCs of tumor were similar to those at 1 month after TACE (P=0.221). There was no significant difference in preoperative ADCs of tumor and ADC% between the progressing and non-progressing groups. In patients with hepatic cancer, 1 month ADC ratio in non-progressing patients were significantly higher than those of progressing patients (P=0.029). Using ROC to evaluate the ability of ADC% could predict early disease progression after TACE. Using -6.455% as the threshold, the area under the ROC curve was 0.867 (95%CI: 0.643-1.000). The sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 66.7%. Conclusion: One month after TACE, the increases in ADCs of tumor were observed only in the non-progressing group; and the ADC ratio seems to be a promising tool for helping predict the early disease progression after TACE in patients with hepatic cancer.

Key words: Diffusion-weighted imaging, Hepatic cancer, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, Follow-up, Apparent diffusion coefficient, Progress