中国癌症杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 146-150.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.02.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

地佐辛或氟比洛芬酯复合丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉在子宫颈癌前病变锥切术中麻醉效果的比较

吕 虎,陈万坤,赵燕君,尹 华,朱 赟   

  1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院麻醉科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海200032
  • 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2018-03-08
  • 通信作者: 朱 赟 E-mail: zhuyun7676@sina.com

Effects of dezocine or flurbiprofen combined with propofol-remifentanil in cervical precancerosis conization

LÜ Hu, CHEN Wankun, ZHAO Yanjun, YIN Hua, ZHU Yun   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Published:2018-02-28 Online:2018-03-08
  • Contact: ZHU Yun E-mail: zhuyun7676@sina.com

摘要: 背景与目的:子宫颈锥切术是治疗宫颈癌前病变常见的手术方式,可采用非气管插管静脉麻醉,因常见的阿片类止痛药有抑制呼吸和循环系统的不良反应,所以需要伍用其他种类镇痛药完善麻醉效果,增强镇痛作用,且不影响呼吸和循环系统。该研究旨在观察地佐辛或氟比洛芬酯联合丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉在子宫颈癌前病变锥切术中的麻醉效果。方法:选取60例行择期子宫颈癌前病变拟行锥切术的患者,随机分为地佐辛组(D组)、氟比洛芬酯组(F组)和0.9%的氯化钠溶液对照组(N组),3组患者分别在麻醉诱导时15 min经静脉给予地佐辛0.1 mg/kg、氟比洛芬酯1 mg/kg和0.9%的氯化钠溶液注射液5 mL。3组患者均采用持续靶控输注瑞芬太尼效应室浓度1.5 ng/ mL,异丙酚血浆浓度2 μg/mL进行麻醉诱导。记录麻醉诱导前(T0)、麻醉诱导完成时(T1)、宫颈锥形切除时(T2)、手术结束后(T3)各时间点心率(heart rate,HR)、呼吸频率(respiratory rate,RR)、血氧饱和度(surplus pulse O2,SPO2)和平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)。记录术中呼吸抑制和体动等不良反应的发生率,评价外科医师对宫颈口扩张满意度,记录3组患者术后苏醒时间、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)疼痛评分、苏醒室期间及术后12 h内恶心呕吐次数。结果:3组患者HR、RR、SPO2、MAP在麻醉诱导前、麻醉诱导完成时及手术结束后3个时间点组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),在手术开始时D组和F组HR和MAP下降明显,与N组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),D组和F组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。手术过程中根据术者满意度评分,D组内等级为优的患者数占组内总数的80%,明显高于N组(30%)和F组(50%)(P均<0.05),主要表现为对宫颈松紧满意度更高。手术结束后3组患者苏醒时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),D组和F组患者疼痛评分均低于N组(P均<0.05),3组患者术后12 h内均未发生恶心呕吐,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:地佐辛、氟比洛芬酯均可以提高子宫颈锥切术麻醉效果,对呼吸和循环抑制作用较轻,改善患者术后舒适度,地佐辛联合丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉有助于松弛宫颈,抑制子宫颈锥切术中患者的应激反应和体动,效果优于氟比洛芬酯。

关键词: 地佐辛, 氟比洛芬酯, 瑞芬太尼, 异丙酚, 子宫颈锥切术

Abstract: Background and purpose: Cervical conization is a common operation to treat precancerous tissues performed under non-intubated anesthesia. As common opioid analgesics have side effects of inhibiting respiration and circulation, other kinds of analgesic drugs should be coordinated to improve the anesthetic effect, without interfering the respiration and circulation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of dezocine or flurbiprofen combined with propofolremifentanil in cervical precancerosis conization. Methods: Sixty patients who underwent cervical conization were equally randomized into dezocine group (group D), flurbiprofen group (group F) and 0.9% natural saline (group N) with 20 patients in each group, and received dezocine 0.1 mg/kg, flurbiprofen 1 mg/kg or 0.9% natural saline in 5 mL respectively before anesthesia induction. During the anesthesia induction, the targeted control infusion of remifentanil in effect concentration was set at 1.5 ng/mL, and the plasma concentration of propofol was set at 2 μg/mL. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), surplus pulse O2 (SPO2) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), MAP were monitored before the anesthesia induction (T0) and after (T1), at the start of cervical conization (T2), and at the end of operation (T3). The incidence of respiratory depression and body movements during surgery were observed. The satisfaction degree of the surgeon to the opening status of cervix was evaluated. The post-operative recovery time, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, nausea and vomiting in the following 12 hours were also recorded. Results: The HR, RR, SPO2 and MAP in three groups did not have any significant change (P>0.05) at T0, T1 and T3. At T2 the HR and MAP decreased significantly in group D and group F compared with group N (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between group D and group F (P>0.05). The surgical satisfaction degree of “Good” in group D was 80%, significantly higher than that in group N (30%) and group F (50%), indicating a better cervix opening in group D. The recovery time in three groups had no significant difference, and the VAS scores in group D and group F were lower than those in group N (P<0.05) after operation, and patients did not have nausea or vomiting in the following 12 hours. Conclusion: Both the dezocine and flurbiprofen could improve the anesthetic effect in cervical conization and post-operative comfort, with less respiratory or circulation depression. Dezocine showed better improvement than flurbiprofen in cervix opening and the inhibition of stress response and body movements during surgery.

Key words: Dezocine, Flurbiprofen, Remifentanil, Propofol, Cervical conization