China Oncology ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 361-367.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.04.006
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
BI Zhao(), CHEN Peng, QIU Pengfei, CHEN Yuguang, WANG Yongsheng(
)
Received:
2022-12-05
Revised:
2023-03-24
Online:
2023-04-30
Published:
2023-05-15
Contact:
WANG Yongsheng
Share article
CLC Number:
BI Zhao, CHEN Peng, QIU Pengfei, CHEN Yuguang, WANG Yongsheng. The analysis of axillary lymph nodes metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(4): 361-367.
Tab. 1
The clinical characteristics of 499 patients"
Characteristics | Patients n (%) |
---|---|
Molecular subtypes | |
HER2+ | 219 (43.9) |
TNBC | 204 (40.9) |
HR+/HER2- | 76 (15.2) |
Clinical nodal stage | |
cN1 | 305 (61.1) |
cN2 | 130 (26.1) |
cN3 | 64 (12.8) |
Clinical tumor stage | |
cT1 | 44 (8.9) |
cT2 | 254 (50.9) |
cT3 | 83 (16.6) |
cT4 | 118 (23.6) |
Axillary surgery | |
SLNB+ALND | 157 (31.5) |
ALND | 342 (68.5) |
Tab. 2
The distribution of ALN at different levels in SLN-positive group after NAT"
SLN+ | Status of ALN at different levels | Patients n (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | L2 | L3 | ||
cN1 group | - | - | - | 23 (67.6) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 6 (17.6) | |
+ | - | + | 1 (3.0) | |
+ | + | - | 3 (8.8) | |
+ | + | + | 1 (3.0) | |
cN2 group | - | - | - | 9 (50.0) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 5 (27.7) | |
+ | - | + | 1 (5.6) | |
+ | + | - | 1 (5.6) | |
+ | + | + | 2 (11.1) | |
cN3 group | - | - | - | 2 (33.2) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 1 (16.7) | |
+ | - | - | 1 (16.7) | |
+ | - | + | 1 (16.7) | |
+ | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | + | 1 (16.7) |
Tab. 3
The distribution of ALN at different levels in SLN-negative group after NAT"
SLN- | Status of ALN at different levels | Patients n (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | L2 | L3 | ||
cN1 group | - | - | - | 57 (91.9) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 4 (6.5) | |
+ | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | + | 1 (1.6) | |
cN2 group | - | - | - | 21 (91.3) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 2 (8.7) | |
+ | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
cN3 group | - | - | - | 111 (78.7) |
- | + | + | 1 (7.1) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 1 (7.1) | |
+ | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | + | 1 (7.1) |
Tab. 4
The analysis of ALN distribution and number of negative SLNs after NAT"
Negative SLN | Status of ALN at different levels | Patients n (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | L2 | L3 | ||
1 SLN- | - | - | - | 30 (88.2) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 3 (8.8) | |
+ | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | + | 1 (3.0) | |
2 SLN- | - | - | - | 21 (95.5) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 1 (4.5) | |
+ | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
3 SLN- | - | - | - | 6 (100.0) |
- | + | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
- | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | - | + | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | - | 0 (0.0) | |
+ | + | + | 0 (0.0) |
[1] |
《中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识2022年版》专家组. 中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(1): 80-89.
doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011 |
Expert Group of Expert Consensus on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer in China (2021 edition). Expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China (2021 edition)[J]. China Oncol, 2022, 32(1): 80-89. | |
[2] |
BI Z, QIU P F, ZHANG Y, et al. A three lncRNA set: AC009975.1, POTEH-AS1 and AL390243.1 as nodal efficacy biomarker of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2 positive breast cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 779140.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.779140 |
[3] |
樊庆达, 丛斌斌, 陈玉光, 等. 临床淋巴结阳性新辅助治疗后腋窝降阶处理的研究进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 174-180.
doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.02.011 |
FAN Q D, CONG B B, CHEN Y G, et al. Research progress of axillary de-escalation management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical lymph node positive patients[J]. China Oncol, 2023, 33(2): 174-180. | |
[4] |
BI Z, QIU P F, YANG T, et al. The modified shrinkage classification modes could help to guide breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 982011.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.982011 |
[5] |
BURSTEIN H J, CURIGLIANO G, THÜRLIMANN B, et al. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021[J]. Ann Oncol, 2021, 32(10): 1216-1235.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023 pmid: 34242744 |
[6] |
GRADISHAR W J, MORAN M S, ABRAHAM J, et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2022, 20(6): 691-722.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030 |
[7] |
邱鹏飞, 王永胜. 前哨淋巴结时代乳腺癌的精准区域处理: 演进与展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(8): 680-687.
doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.08.002 |
QIU P F, WANG Y S. Precise regional management of breast cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: evolution and prospect[J]. China Oncol, 2022, 32(8): 680-687. | |
[8] |
KUEMMEL S, HEIL J, RUELAND A, et al. A prospective, multicenter registry study to evaluate the clinical feasibility of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in node-positive breast cancer patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 276(5): e553-e562.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004572 |
[9] |
ARAGÓN-SÁNCHEZ S, CIRUELOS-GIL E, LÓPEZ-MARÍN L, et al. Feasibility of targeted axillary dissection for de-escalation of surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Surg Oncol, 2022, 44: 101823.
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101823 |
[10] |
BI Z, CHEN J J, LIU P C, et al. Candidates of genomic tests in HR + /HER2- breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node without axillary lymph node dissection: analysis from multicentric cohorts[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 722325.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722325 |
[11] |
HARRISON B. Update on sentinel node pathology in breast cancer[J]. Semin Diagn Pathol, 2022, 39(5): 355-366.
doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2022.06.016 pmid: 35803776 |
[12] |
CHUNG H L, SUN J, LEUNG J W T. Breast cancer skip metastases: frequency, associated tumor characteristics, and role of staging nodal ultrasound in detection[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2021, 217(4): 835-844.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24371 |
[13] |
SUN J Y, YIN J, NING L S, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancers with axillary skip metastases[J]. J Investig Surg, 2012, 25(1): 33-36.
doi: 10.3109/08941939.2011.598605 |
[14] | 孙敬岩, 宁连胜. 乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结跳跃式转移的临床病理研究[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2008, 30(5): 352-355. |
SUN J Y, NING L S. Axillary skip metastases in breast cancer[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2008, 30(5): 352-355. | |
[15] |
MOO T A, EDELWEISS M, HAJIYEVA S, et al. Is low-volume disease in the sentinel node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy an indication for axillary dissection?[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(6): 1488-1494.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6429-2 |
[16] |
ALMAHARIQ M F, LEVITIN R, QUINN T J, et al. Omission of axillary lymph node dissection is associated with inferior survival in breast cancer patients with residual N1 nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(2): 930-940.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08928-2 |
[17] | 王永胜, 吴炅, 刘红, 等. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检规范化操作指南(2022精要版)[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2022, 49(22): 1136-1142. |
WANG Y S, WU J, LIU H, et al. Guidelines for standardized practice of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer (2022 abridged version)[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol, 2022, 49(22): 1136-1142. | |
[18] |
COSTAZ H, BOULLE D, BERTAUT A, et al. Omitting axillary lymph node dissection after positive sentinel lymph node in the post-Z0011 era: compliance with NCCN and ASCO clinical guidelines and Z0011 criteria in a large prospective cohort[J]. Bull Cancer, 2022, 109(3): 268-279.
doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.09.018 |
[19] |
KORDE L A, SOMERFIELD M R, CAREY L A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy for breast cancer: ASCO guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(13): 1485-1505.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03399 pmid: 33507815 |
[20] |
VAN LOEVEZIJN A A, VAN DER NOORDAA M E M, STOKKEL M P M, et al. Three-year follow-up of de-escalated axillary treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer: the MARI-protocol[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2022, 193(1): 37-48.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06545-z |
[21] | MONTAGNA G. OPBC-04/EUBREAST-06/OMA study[C]. SABCS, 2022, Abstract GS4-02. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
沪ICP备12009617
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd