China Oncology ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 1028-1035.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2024.11.005
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
FENG Huizhi1(), LIU Jingmei1, BU Xiaoqian2
Received:
2024-06-05
Revised:
2024-08-24
Online:
2024-11-30
Published:
2024-12-11
Contact:
FENG Huizhi
Share article
CLC Number:
FENG Huizhi, LIU Jingmei, BU Xiaoqian. A retrospective study of pembrolizumab combined with XELOX regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2024, 34(11): 1028-1035.
Tab. 1
Comparison of clinical data between two groups [n (%)]"
Information | Control group (n=45) | Observation group (n=45) | t/χ2/U value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | 0.189 | 0.664 | ||
Male | 29 (64.44) | 27 (60.00) | ||
Female | 16 (35.56) | 18 (40.00) | ||
Age/year range ( | 40-67 (55.45±5.15) | 40-69 (55.67±5.33) | 0.199 | 0.843 |
ASA classification | 0.394 | 0.694 | ||
Level Ⅰ | 14 (31.11) | 16 (35.56) | ||
Level Ⅱ | 19 (42.22) | 18 (40.00) | ||
Level Ⅲa | 12 (26.67) | 11 (24.44) | ||
Tumor location | 0.411 | 0.938 | ||
Gastric antrum | 13 (28.89) | 15 (33.33) | ||
Gastric body | 10 (22.22) | 11 (24.44) | ||
Cardia | 14 (31.11) | 12 (26.67) | ||
Angular notch | 8 (17.78) | 7 (15.56) | ||
Transfer situation | 0.284 | 0.868 | ||
Not transferred | 8 (17.78) | 10 (22.22) | ||
Lymph node metastasis | 24 (53.33) | 23 (51.11) | ||
Hematogenous metastasis | 13 (28.89) | 12 (26.67) |
Tab. 2
Comparison of tumor marker levels between two groups before and after treatment ($\bar{x}±s$)"
Group | Case n | CEA/(ng·mL-1) | CA19-9/(U·mL-1) |
---|---|---|---|
Before treatment | |||
Observation group | 45 | 15.90±3.96 | 56.05±5.67 |
Control group | 45 | 17.11±2.87 | 54.89±6.81 |
t value | 1.660 | 0.878 | |
P value | 0.101 | 0.382 | |
After treatment | |||
Observation group | 45 | 5.51±0.46 | 18.89±3.01 |
Control group | 45 | 9.98±0.71 | 24.75±4.15 |
t value | 35.445 | 7.668 | |
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Tab. 3
Comparison of gut microbiota between two groups before and after treatment ($\bar{x}±s$)"
Group | Case n | Bifidobacterium CFU/mL | Escherichia coli CFU/mL | Lactobacillus CFU/mL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||||
Observation group | 45 | 7.95±0.74 | 8.61±0.84 | 8.36±0.72 | 7.55±0.61 | 7.90±0.67 | 8.74±0.83 | ||
Control group | 45 | 7.83±0.81 | 7.50±0.63 | 8.52±0.61 | 9.11±0.80 | 7.76±0.78 | 7.62±0.81 | ||
Healthy people | 45 | 9.23±0.95 | 6.60±0.54 | 9.30±0.88 | |||||
F value | 38.595 | 7.092 | 129.613 | 10.402 | 53.449 | 6.478 | |||
P value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Tab. 4
Comparison of the rate of improvement in quality of life between two groups before and after treatment [n (%)]"
Group | Case n | Improvement | Stability | Progress |
---|---|---|---|---|
Observation group | 45 | 27 (60.0) | 14 (31.1) | 4 (8.9) |
Control group | 45 | 17 (37.8) | 19 (42.2) | 9 (20.0) |
χ2 value | 4.447 | 1.196 | 2.248 | |
P value | 0.035 | 0.274 | 0.134 |
Tab. 5
Comparison of toxic side effects between two groups before and after treatment [n (%)]"
Group | Case n | Nausea and vomiting | Leukopenia | Rash | Diarrhea | Liver function damage | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ-Ⅱ | Ⅲ-Ⅳ | Ⅰ-Ⅱ | Ⅲ-Ⅳ | Ⅰ-Ⅱ | Ⅲ-Ⅳ | Ⅰ-Ⅱ | Ⅲ-Ⅳ | Ⅰ-Ⅱ | Ⅲ-Ⅳ | ||||||
Observation group | 45 | 5 (11.1) | 4 (8.9) | 2 (4.4) | 2 (4.4) | 3 (6.7) | 2 (4.4) | 4 (8.9) | 3 (6.7) | 3 (6.7) | 5 (11.11) | ||||
Control group | 45 | 8 (17.8) | 6 (13.3) | 5 (11.1) | 6 (13.3) | 8 (17.8) | 5 (11.1) | 8 (17.8) | 5 (11.1) | 9 (20.0) | 8 (17.78) | ||||
U value | 0.064 | 0.135 | 0.051 | 0.887 | 0.624 | ||||||||||
P value | 0.949 | 0.893 | 0.960 | 0.375 | 0.533 |
Tab. 6
Comparison of therapeutic effects between two groups before and after treatment [n (%)]"
Group | Case n | CR | PR | SD | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observation group | 45 | 4 (8.9) | 22 (48.9) | 10 (22.2) | 9 (20.0) |
Control group | 45 | 0 (0.0) | 16 (35.6) | 11 (24.4) | 18 (40.0) |
χ2 value | 2.355 | 1.640 | 0.062 | 5.409 | |
P value | 0.125 | 0.200 | 0.803 | 0.020 |
[1] |
YASUDA T, WANG Y A. Gastric cancer immunosuppressive microenvironment heterogeneity: implications for therapy development[J]. Trends Cancer, 2024, 10(7): 627-642.
doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2024.03.008 pmid: 38600020 |
[2] | HOU W T, ZHAO Y Q, ZHU H. Predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in gastric cancer: current status and emerging prospects[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(20): 15321. |
[3] |
XU J M, JIANG H P, PAN Y Y, et al. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy for unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: the ORIENT-16 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2023, 330(21): 2064-2074.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.19918 pmid: 38051328 |
[4] |
LING Q, HUANG S T, YU T H, et al. Optimal timing of surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2023, 21(1): 377.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03251-y pmid: 38037067 |
[5] |
YARCHOAN M, GANE E J, MARRON T U, et al. Personalized neoantigen vaccine and pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 1/2 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2024, 30(4): 1044-1053.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02894-y pmid: 38584166 |
[6] |
WADDELL T, VERHEIJ M, ALLUM W, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2014, 110(1): 189-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.015 pmid: 24636158 |
[7] |
STEDMAN M R, WATFORD D J, CHERTOW G M, et al. Karnofsky performance score-failure to thrive as a frailty proxy?[J]. Transplant Direct, 2021, 7(7): e708.
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001164 pmid: 34124344 |
[8] | 张萍, 艾斌. 实体瘤免疫治疗疗效评价标准[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 43(11): 848-851. |
ZHANG P, AI B. Efficacy evaluation criteria for immunotherapy in solid tumors[J]. J Int Oncol, 2016, 43(11): 848-851. | |
[9] | 朱春荣, 熊峰, 朱彦博, 等. 贝伐单抗联合FOLFOX4或FOLFIRI方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床观察[J]. 江苏医药, 2012, 38(19): 2306-2307. |
ZHU C R, XIONG F, ZHU Y B, et al. Clinical observation of bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer[J]. Remote Sens Technol Appl, 2012, 38(19): 2306-2307. | |
[10] | BANTA K L, XU X Z, CHITRE A S, et al. Mechanistic convergence of the TIGIT and PD-1 inhibitory pathways necessitates co-blockade to optimize anti-tumor CD8+ T cell responses[J]. Immunity, 2022, 55(3): 512-526.e9. |
[11] |
SHITARA K, ÖZGÜROĞLU M, BANG Y J, et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10142): 123-133.
doi: S0140-6736(18)31257-1 pmid: 29880231 |
[12] | 王俊松, 吕秀鹏. 卡培他滨、奥沙利铂联合帕博利珠单抗对进展期胃癌的疗效及安全性[J]. 实用药物与临床, 2022, 25(3): 217-220. |
WANG J S, (LÜ/LV/LU/LYU) X P. Safety and efficacy of capecitabine, oxaliplatin combined with pembrolizumab in advanced gastric cancer[J]. Pract Pharm Clin Remedies, 2022, 25(3): 217-220. | |
[13] | 李璐璐, 黄然欣, 张蓉, 等. 信迪利单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇对晚期胃癌血清肿瘤标志物水平及免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2023, 22(22): 2384-2387. |
LI L L, HUANG R X, ZHANG R, et al. Effect of sintilimab combined with albumin paclitaxel on serum tumor marker levels and immune function in advanced gastric cancer[J]. J Clin Exp Med, 2023, 22(22): 2384-2387. | |
[14] | 邵化敏, 马锦程, 杨贺才. 血清TK1、CEA、CA19-9检测对胃癌的诊断价值及与其临床病理特征的相关性研究[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2023, 38(5): 730-733. |
SHAO H M, MA J C, YANG H C. Diagnostic value of serum TK1, CEA and CA19-9 detection on gastric cancer and their correlation with clinicopathological features of gastric cancer[J]. Pract J Cancer, 2023, 38(5): 730-733. | |
[15] | ZHENG L, HU F, HUANG L, et al. Association of metabolomics with PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2024, 12(4): e008190. |
[16] |
AHMED A, TAIT S W G. Targeting immunogenic cell death in cancer[J]. Mol Oncol, 2020, 14(12): 2994-3006.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12851 pmid: 33179413 |
[17] | XIONG G, CHEN Z, LIU Q W, et al. CD276 regulates the immune escape of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through CXCL1-CXCR2 induced NETs[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2024, 12(5): e008662. |
[18] | GOU M M, ZHANG Y, WANG Z K, et al. PD-1 inhibitor combined with albumin paclitaxel and apatinib as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a single-center, single-arm, phase Ⅱ study[J]. Invest New Drugs, 2024, 42(2): 171-178. |
[19] | ZHANG T Q, GENG Z J, ZUO M X, et al. Camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus apatinib (an VEGFR-2 inhibitor) and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (TRIPLET): a phase Ⅱ study[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023, 8(1): 413. |
[20] | 刘昭, 任玉川, 张亚鹏, 等. 信迪利单抗联合化疗对晚期胃癌患者近期疗效及血清CEA sTim-3 sLAG-3和T淋巴细胞亚群的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2024, 30(2): 335-340. |
LIU Z, REN Y C, ZHANG Y P, et al. Effects of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy on short-term efficacy and serum CEA, sTim-3 sLAG-3 and T lymphocyte subsets in patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. Hebei Med, 2024, 30(2): 335-340. | |
[21] | 李慧珍, 吴紫莹, 范婷婷, 等. 山西省东南部地区胃癌患者肠道菌群分布的配对病例对照研究[J]. 中国微生态学杂志, 2021, 33(8): 869-875. |
LI H Z, WU Z Y, FAN T T, et al. A paired case-control study on the distribution of intestinal flora in patients with gastric cancer in southeastern Shanxi Province[J]. Chin J Microecol, 2021, 33(8): 869-875. | |
[22] |
PAN C L, ZHANG H W, ZHANG L Y, et al. Surgery-induced gut microbial dysbiosis promotes cognitive impairment via regulation of intestinal function and the metabolite palmitic amide[J]. Microbiome, 2023, 11(1): 248.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01689-6 pmid: 37936242 |
[23] | WANG S, XU B L, ZHANG Y Y, et al. The role of intestinal flora on tumorigenesis, progression, and the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2023, 21(1): 65-82. |
[24] |
MAGER L F, BURKHARD R, PETT N, et al. Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy[J]. Science, 2020, 369(6510): 1481-1489.
doi: 10.1126/science.abc3421 pmid: 32792462 |
[25] | ABDULQADIR R, ENGERS J, AL-SADI R. Role of Bifidobacterium in modulating the intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier: current knowledge and perspectives[J]. Curr Dev Nutr, 2023, 7(12): 102026. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
沪ICP备12009617
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd