

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院妇科,广西,南宁,530021
Published Online:17 January 2020,
Published:17 January 2020
移动端阅览
隆曜先, 王毛毛, 蔡志福, 张洁清, 李 力. 脂联素通过AMPK/mTOR/4EBP1通路对子宫内膜癌细胞迁移及侵袭的影响[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(1): 25-31.
隆曜先, 王毛毛, 蔡志福, et al. Effect of adiponectin on migration and invasion of endometrial cancer cells via AMPK/mTOR/4EBP1 pathway[J]. China Oncology, 2020, 30(1): 25-31.
隆曜先, 王毛毛, 蔡志福, 张洁清, 李 力. 脂联素通过AMPK/mTOR/4EBP1通路对子宫内膜癌细胞迁移及侵袭的影响[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(1): 25-31. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2020.01.003.
隆曜先, 王毛毛, 蔡志福, et al. Effect of adiponectin on migration and invasion of endometrial cancer cells via AMPK/mTOR/4EBP1 pathway[J]. China Oncology, 2020, 30(1): 25-31. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2020.01.003.
背景与目的:脂联素(adiponectin,APN)被认为是一种强有力的抑制肿瘤细胞生长的抗癌因子,但APN调节细胞转移的作用机制尚不清楚。探讨在子宫内膜癌HEC-1B细胞中,APN能否通过腺苷酸活化蛋白激酶(AMP-activated protein kinase,AMPK)/哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mammalian target of rapamycin,mTOR)/磷酸化真核启动因子4E结合蛋白1(4E binding protein 1,4EBP1)通路抑制细胞迁移及侵袭。方法:实验设计为4组:① APN组:20 μg/mL APN作用于细胞30 min;② 抑制剂组:10 μmol/L复合物C(AMPK抑制剂)作用于细胞30 min;③ APN+抑制剂组:10 μmol/L复合物C预处理细胞30 min后,加入20 μg/mL APN作用30 min;④ 对照组:仅加入无血清DMEM培养基。实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction,RTFQ-PCR)技术检测4组细胞中B细胞淋巴瘤-2(B- cell lymphoma 2,Bcl-2)和基质金属蛋白酶9(matrix metallopeptidase 9,MMP-9)的mRNA表达;蛋白质印迹法(Western blot)检测4组细胞中Bcl-2、MMP-9及AMPK信号通路中AMPK、mTOR、4EBP1蛋白水平;Transwell及划痕实验检测4组HEC-1B细胞的迁移能力。结果:Bcl-2和MMP-9 mRNA的表达水平在APN组中分别为0.64±0.08和0.68±0.02,均明显低于APN+抑制剂组(分别为0.98±0.11和0.96±0.08;P=0.02和0.03)。APN组中,HEC-1B细胞Bcl-2、MMP-9蛋白水平分别与对照组、抑制剂组、APN+抑制剂组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.00)。APN组中,HEC-1B细胞AMPK、mTOR、4EBP1蛋白水平分别为1.49±0.02、0.48±0.00、0.19±0.00。与对照组比较,蛋白水平明显升高(P=0.00)。APN组穿膜细胞数为(78.72±10.74)个,APN+抑制剂组为(131.45±9.11)个,对照组为(131.91±12.29)个,APN组与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.00),APN+抑制剂组与对照组相比,差异无统计学意义(P=0.12)。APN组中,HEC-1B细胞迁移率为(19.27±1.14)%,与其余3组比较,4组组间差异均有统计学意义(P=0.00),其余3组组间差异无统计学意义(F=2.78,P=0.39)。结论:APN可经AMPK/mTOR/4EBP1信号通路发挥抑制子宫内膜癌细胞迁移及侵袭的效应,达到抗肿瘤作用。
Background and purpose: Adiponectin (APN) is considered to be a potent anti-cancer factor that inhibits tumor cell growth
but the mechanism by which APN regulates cell metastasis remains unclear. This study investigated whether APN can pass AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/phosphorylated eukaryotic promoter 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1) in endometrial cancer HEC-1B cells to inhibit cell migration and invasion. Methods: There were 4 experimental groups: ① APN group: 20 μg/mL APN treated cells for 30 min; ② inhibitor group: 10 μmol/L complex C (AMPK inhibitor) treated cells for 30 min; ③ APN+inhibitor group: 10 μmol/L complex C pretreated cells for 30 min followed by incubation with 20 μg/mL APN for 30 min; ④ control group: only serum-free DMEM medium was added. The expression levels of B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) mRNA in 4 groups of cells were detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTFQ-PCR). Western blot was used to detect the protein activation levels of AMPK
mTOR and 4EBP1 in Bcl-2
MMP-9 and AMPK signaling pathways in 4 groups of cells. Transwell and scratch assays were used to detect the migration ability of HEC-1B cells in four groups. Results: The expression levels of Bcl-2 and MMP-9 mRNA in the APN group were 0.64±0.08 and 0.68±0.02
respectively
which were significantly lower than those in the APN+inhibitor group (0.98±0.11 and 0.96±0.08; P=0.02 and 0.03). In the APN group
the protein expressions of Bcl-2 and MMP-9 in HEC-1B cells were significantly different from those in the control group
inhibitor group and APN+ inhibitor group (P=0.00). The activation levels of AMPK
mTOR and 4EBP1 proteins in HEC-1B cells of APN group were 1.49±0.02
0.48±0.00 and 0.19±0.00
respectively. Protein levels were significantly enhanced compared with the control group (P=0.00). The number of transmembrane cells was 78.72±10.74 in the APN group
131.45±9.11 in the APN+ inhibitor group
and 131.91±12.29 in the control group. The difference in the number of transmembrane cells between the APN group and the control group was statistically significant (P=0.00)
while there was no significant difference between the APN+ inhibitor group and the control group (P=0.12). The mobility of HEC-1B cells in AP-N group was (19.27±1.60)%
which was significantly lower than that of the control group [(66.51±1.19)%]. The difference in the mobility of HEC-1B cells between the four groups was statistically significant (P=0.00)
while there was no significant difference between the three groups (F=2.78
P=0.39). Conclusion: APN can inhibit the migration and invasion of endometrial cancer cells through AMPK/mTOR/4EBP1 signaling pathway and achieve its anti-tumor effect.
0
Views
2556
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621