

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)研究生部,山东 济南 250118
2. 山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心,山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院),山东 济南 250117
3. 泰安市肿瘤防治院乳腺外科,山东 泰安 271000
4. 泰安市妇幼保健院儿科,山东 泰安 271000
Received:15 November 2022,
Revised:2023-02-08,
Published:28 February 2023
移动端阅览
Baowei DUAN, Na ZHAO, Zhao BI, et al. Radiotracer technique optimization for breast cancer internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(2): 134-141.
Baowei DUAN, Na ZHAO, Zhao BI, et al. Radiotracer technique optimization for breast cancer internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(2): 134-141. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.02.006.
背景与目的:
山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心前期研发新型核素示踪技术,显著提高了内乳前哨淋巴结(internal mammary sentinel lymph node,IMSLN)显像率,但该技术获得的IMSLN显像率相较于腋窝前哨淋巴结(axillary sentinel lymph node,ASLN)仍然存在一定差距。本研究旨在通过优化新型核素示踪技术,进一步提高IMSLN显像率,推动内乳前哨淋巴结活检(internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy,IM-SLNB)广泛应用。
方法:
前瞻性入组159例原发性乳腺癌患者,分为优化核素示踪技术组(
n
= 81,A组)和新型核素示踪技术组(
n
= 78,B组)。A组在超声引导下将
99m
Tc-硫胶体平均注射在腺体最丰富的3个区域腺体实质内(总放射强度1.0 ~ 1.3 mCi;0.8 ~ 1.0 mL/点)。B组在超声引导下将
99m
Tc-硫胶体平均注射在乳腺6点和12点腺体实质内(总放射强度1.0 ~ 1.3 mCi;0.8 ~ 1.0 mL/点)。术前进行单光子发射计算机断层扫描(single photon emission computed tomography,SPECT)/计算机体层成像(computed tomography,CT)淋巴显像,术中γ探测仪探测前哨淋巴结。比较两组患者IMSLN及ASLN显像率的差异,同时分析可能影响IMSLN显像率的因素。
结果:
术前SPECT/CT IMSLN显像率在两组间差异无统计学意义(
P
= 0.806)。术中IMSLN显像率A组显著高于B组(87.65%
vs
70.51%,
P
= 0.008)。亚组分析显示,A组年龄≤50岁和
>
50岁患者术中IMSLN显像率分别为92.31% 和 83.33%(
P
= 0.315),B组年龄≤50岁患者术中IMSLN显像率显著高于
>
50岁患者(81.58%
vs
60.00%,
P
= 0.037)。A组IMSLN的中位体外放射性计数显著高于B组(160.50
vs
59.00,
P
= 0.005)。
结论:
优化核素示踪技术能有效地增加核素内乳区淋巴引流及摄取,可在不影响ASLN显像率的同时显著提高IMSLN显像率,有利于IM-SLNB推广应用。
Background and purpose:
The modified injection technique developed in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences has significantly improved the visualization rate of internal mammary sentinel lymph nodes (IMSLN)
however there is still a gap between the visualization rate of IMSLN obtained by this technique and that of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (ASLN). The study aimed to further improve the IMSLN visualization rate and promote the widespread use of internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) by optimizing the modified injection technique.
Methods:
A total of 159 patients with primary breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective group and divided into the optimized radiotracer technique group (group A
n
=81) and the modified injection technique group (group B
n
=78). In group A
99m
Tc-sulfur colloid was injected averagely into parenchyma in the gland's three most abundant regions under ultrasound guidance (total radioactive intensity 1.0-1.3 mCi; 0.8-1.0 mL/point). In group B
99mTc-sulfur colloid was injected averagely into the parenchyma of the breast at 6 and 12 points under ultrasound guidance (total radioactive intensity 1.0-1.3 mCi; 0.8-1.0 mL/point). Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) lymphoscintigraphy was performed preoperatively
and the sentinel lymph nodes were detected intraoperatively by γ probe. In this study
we evaluated the differences in IMSLN and ASLN visualization rates between the groups
and also analyzed the factors that may affect the IMSLN visualization rate.
Results:
There was no statistically significant difference in visualization rate of IM-SLN measured by preoperative SPECT/CT between the two groups (
P
=0.806). The intraoperative visualization rate of IM-SLN was significantly higher in group A than in group B (87.65%
vs
70.51%
P
=0.008). Analysis of
subgroups showed that the intraoperative visualization rate of IMSLN was 92.31% and 83.33% (
P
=0.315) in group A patients aged ≤50 years and
>
50 years
respectively
and the intraoperative visualization rate of IMSLN was significantly higher in group B patients aged ≤50 years than in patients aged
>
50 years (81.58%
vs
60.00%
P
=0.037). The median in vitro radioactivity count of IMSLN was significantly higher in group A than in group B (160.50
vs
59.00
P
=0.005).
Conclusion:
The optimized radiotracer technique can effectively increase the lymphatic drainage and uptake in the internal mammary region of the radiotracer
which can significantly improve the visualization rate of IM-SLN without affecting the visualization rate of ASLN
and is conducive to the promotion and application of IM-SLNB.
HULTBORN K A , LARSSON L G , RAGNHULT I . The lymph drainage from the breast to the axillary and parasternal lymph nodes, studied with the aid of colloidal Au198 [J ] . Acta radiol , 1955 , 43 ( 1 ): 52 - 64 . DOI: 10.3109/00016925509172744 http://doi.org/10.3109/00016925509172744
KRAG D N , ANDERSON S J , JULIAN T B , et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2010 , 11 ( 10 ): 927 - 933 . DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2
GIULIANO A E , BALLMAN K , MCCALL L , et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: long-term follow-up from the American College of Surgeons oncology group (alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 randomized trial [J ] . Ann Surg , 2016 , 264 ( 3 ): 413 - 420 . DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001863 http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001863
GIULIANO A E , BALLMAN K V , MCCALL L , et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (alliance) randomized clinical trial [J ] . JAMA , 2017 , 318 ( 10 ): 918 - 926 . DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470 http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11470 http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2017.11470 http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2017.11470
WETZIG N , GILL P G , ESPINOZA D , et al. Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? Five-year outcomes of the RACS sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC) 1 trial: assessment and incidence of true lymphedema [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2017 , 24 ( 4 ): 1064 - 1070 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5669-2 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5669-2
GALIMBERTI V , COLE B F , VIALE G , et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2018 , 19 ( 10 ): 1385 - 1393 . DOI: S1470-2045(18)30380-2 http://doi.org/S1470-2045(18)30380-2
ASADI M , KRAG D . Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinical practice [J ] . Int J Surg , 2016 , 36 (Pt A): 332 - 334 . DOI: S1743-9191(16)31043-3 http://doi.org/S1743-9191(16)31043-3
BI Z , CHEN P , LIU J J , et al. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [J ] . J Breast Cancer , 2018 , 21 ( 4 ): 442 - 446 . DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e49 http://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e49
QIU P F , ZHAO R R , WANG W , et al. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer: diagnosis and implications for patient management [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2020 , 27 ( 2 ): 375 - 383 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07705-0 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07705-0
SHIMAZU K , TAMAKI Y , TAGUCHI T , et al. Lymphoscintigraphic visualization of internal mammary nodes with subtumoral injection of radiocolloid in patients with breast cancer [J ] . Ann Surg , 2003 , 237 ( 3 ): 390 - 398 .
RODIER J F , VELTEN M , WILT M , et al. Prospective multicentric randomized study comparing periareolar and peritumoral injection of radiotracer and blue dye for the detection of sentinel lymph node in breast sparing procedures: FRANSENODE trial [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2007 , 25 ( 24 ): 3664 - 3669 . DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4228 http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4228 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4228 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4228
MUDUN A , SANLI Y , OZMEN V , et al. Comparison of different injection sites of radionuclide for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: single institution experience [J ] . Clin Nucl Med , 2008 , 33 ( 4 ): 262 - 267 . DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181662fc7 http://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181662fc7
QIU P F , CONG B B , ZHAO R R , et al. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy with modified injection technique: high visualization rate and accurate staging [J ] . Medicine (Baltimore) , 2015 , 94 ( 41 ): e1790 . DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001790 http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001790 https://journals.lww.com/00005792-201510020-00034 https://journals.lww.com/00005792-201510020-00034
QIU P F , WANG X E , WANG Y S . Indications for individual internal mammary node irradiation [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2021 , 22 ( 2 ): e40 . DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30739-7 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30739-7 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204520307397 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204520307397
王永胜 , 赵荣荣 , 刘雁冰 , 等 . 精准医学时代乳腺癌内乳前哨淋巴结活检适应证的探讨 [J ] . 中华肿瘤杂志 , 2019 , 41 ( 4 ): 251 - 256 .
WANG Y S , ZHAO R R , LIU Y B , et al. Discussion on the indications of internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer in the era of precision medicine [J ] . Chin J Oncol , 2019 , 41 ( 4 ): 251 - 256 .
毕钊 , 刘静静 , 陈鹏 , 等 . 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后内乳区前哨淋巴结活检研究 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2019 , 29 ( 2 ): 131 - 135 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2019.02.006 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2019.02.006
BI Z , LIU J J , CHEN P , et al. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J ] . China Oncol , 2019 , 29 ( 2 ): 131 - 135 .
TANIS P J , NIEWEG O E , VALDÉS OLMOS R A , et al. Anatomy and physiology of lymphatic drainage of the breast from the perspective of sentinel node biopsy [J ] . J Am Coll Surg , 2001 , 192 ( 3 ): 399 - 409 . DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00776-6 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00776-6 https://journals.lww.com/00019464-200103000-00016 https://journals.lww.com/00019464-200103000-00016
YU J M , LI G , LI J B , et al. The pattern of lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer and its influence on the delineation of radiation fields [J ] . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys , 2005 , 61 ( 3 ): 874 - 878 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.252 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.252 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360301604019923 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360301604019923
BRESLIN J W , YANG Y , SCALLAN J P , et al. Lymphatic vessel network structure and physiology [J ] . Compr Physiol , 2018 , 9 ( 1 ): 207 - 299 . DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c180015 http://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c180015
0
Views
2289
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621