

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心,山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院),山东 济南 250117
WANG Yongsheng.
Received:05 December 2022,
Revised:2023-03-24,
Published:30 April 2023
移动端阅览
Zhao BI, Peng CHEN, Pengfei QIU, et al. The analysis of axillary lymph nodes metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(4): 361-367.
Zhao BI, Peng CHEN, Pengfei QIU, et al. The analysis of axillary lymph nodes metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(4): 361-367. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.04.006.
背景与目的:
多项指南及共识已确认临床淋巴结阳性(clinical nodal positive,cN
+
)且新辅助治疗(neoadjuvant therapy,NAT)后降期转阴患者接受前哨淋巴结活检(sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB)的可行性,但分析cN
+
患者NAT后腋窝淋巴结(axillary lym
ph node,ALN)各解剖分区转移情况的研究较少。本研究的目的是探索NAT后各腋窝解剖分区ALN的转移情况,为NAT后腋窝降阶梯手术管理提供更充实的理论依据。
方法:
回顾性分析2018年4月—2020年4月山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心收治499例接受NAT的cN
+
患者临床病理学参数,其中157例患者NAT后降期转阴接受SLNB联合腋窝淋巴结清扫(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND),342例患者直接行ALND。同时入组2020年5月—2020年12月山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院)乳腺病中心收治46例临床淋巴结(clinical lymph node,cN)状态为cN
1
且NAT后降期转阴同时接受靶向腋窝清扫(target axillary dissection,TAD)患者,这部分患者NAT前在超声引导下于阳性ALN放置标记夹,并于术中取出将其作为前哨淋巴结(sentinel lymph node,SLN)。分析各解剖分区ALN转移情况。
结果:
入组499例患者NAT后ALN“跳跃式转移”率仅为0.8%(4/499),SLNB联合ALND组和直接ALND组分别为0.5%和1.0%。NAT后SLN阳性患者中,非SLN(non-SLN,NSLN)阳性率为41.4%。NAT后SLN阴性患者中,NSLN转移率为10.1%,其中cN
1
、cN
2
和cN
3
亚组中NSLN阳性率分别为8.1%、8.7%和21.3%。初诊cN
1
亚组NAT后SLN阴性患者,SLN 1枚、2枚和3枚阴性时NSLN阳性率分别为11.8%、4.6%和0.0%。初诊cN
1
且NAT后接受TAD患者,SLN阴性患者NSLN转移率为4.3%,SLN 1枚、2枚和3枚阴性时NSLN阳性率分别为5%、5%和0%,且与检出的阴性SLN数目无关。
结论:
初诊cN
+
患者若NAT后SLN阳性,ALND仍是标准处理。初诊cN
1
患者若采用TAD标记SLN,接受SLNB豁免ALND时可能不再需要考虑阴性SLN数目。
Background and purpose:
Multiple guidelines and consensus have confirmed the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in clinical nodal positive (cN
+
) patients converting to negative after NAT. There are few studies on the metastasis of axillary lymph node (ALN) at each anatomic level after NAT. This study aimed to explore the metastasis of ALN in each anatomic level
in order to provide more basis for the axillary de-escalation management after NAT.
Methods:
From April 2018 to 2020
499 patients in Shandong Cancer Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients (
n
=157) with initial cN
+
and ycN
0
disease after NAT underwent SLNB plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Patients (
n
=342) with initial cN
+
and ycN
+
disease after NAT had undergone ALND directly. At the same time
from May 2020
to December 2020
46 patients with initial cN
1
and ycN
0
disease after NAT underwent targeted axillary dissection (TAD). These patients underwent clip insertion into the most suspicious ALN. Axillary surgery was performed with SLNB plus ALND. The ALN status at each anatomic level was analyzed.
Results:
Among the 499 patients
the incidence of ALN “skip metastasis” was 0.8% (4/499)
similar to those patients without NAT
and it was 0.5% and 1.0% in SLNB group and directly ALND
respectively. Out of the sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive patients after NAT
41.4% of them had positive non-SLN (NSLN). Out of the SLN-negative patients after NAT
10.1% of them had positive NSLNs
and the rates of positive NSLNs were 8.1% (5/62)
8.7% (2/23) and 21.3% (3/11) in cN
1
cN
2
and cN
3
subgroups
respectively. In the cN
1
subgroup
the NSLNs metastasis rate were 11.8% (4/34)
4.6% (1/22)
and 0.0% (0/6) when patients had 1
2
and 3 negative SLN
respectively. Among the 46 patients receiving TAD
if clips were inserted into the most suspicious ALNs and removed during surgery
the incidence of positive NSLN was 4.3% (2/46). The rates of positive NSLN were 5% (1/20)
5% (1/20)
and 0% (0/6) when 1
2
and 3 negative SLNs were detected
respectively
and it was not related to the number of detected negative SLN.
Conclusion:
ALND is still the standard axillary treatment in SLN-positive patients after NAT. For patient with initial cN
1
and ycN
0
disease after NAT
if clips were used to identify biopsied lymph nodes at diagnosis
the number of negative SLN might be no longer the requirement for SLNB to omit ALND after NAT.
《中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识2022年版》专家组 . 中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2022年版) [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2022 , 32 ( 1 ): 80 - 89 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011
Expert Group of Expert Consensus on Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer in China (2021 edition) . Expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China (2021 edition) [J ] . China Oncol , 2022 , 32 ( 1 ): 80 - 89 .
BI Z , QIU P F , ZHANG Y , et al . A three lncRNA set: AC009975.1, POTEH-AS1 and AL390243.1 as nodal efficacy biomarker of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2 positive breast cancer [J ] . Front Oncol , 2021 , 11 : 779140 . DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.779140 http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.779140 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.779140/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.779140/full
樊庆达 , 丛斌斌 , 陈玉光 , 等 . 临床淋巴结阳性新辅助治疗后腋窝降阶处理的研究进展 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2023 , 33 ( 2 ): 174 - 180 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.02.011 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.02.011
FAN Q D , CONG B B , CHEN Y G , et al . Research progress of axillary de-escalation management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical lymph node positive patients [J ] . China Oncol , 2023 , 33 ( 2 ): 174 - 180 .
BI Z , QIU P F , YANG T , et al . The modified shrinkage classification modes could help to guide breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer [J ] . Front Oncol , 2022 , 12 : 982011 . DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.982011 http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.982011 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.982011/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.982011/full
BURSTEIN H J , CURIGLIANO G , THÜRLIMANN B , et al . Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021 [J ] . Ann Oncol , 2021 , 32 ( 10 ): 1216 - 1235 . DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023
GRADISHAR W J , MORAN M S , ABRAHAM J , et al . Breast cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2022 , 20 ( 6 ): 691 - 722 . DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030 http://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030 https://jnccn.org/view/journals/jnccn/20/6/article-p691.xml https://jnccn.org/view/journals/jnccn/20/6/article-p691.xml
邱鹏飞 , 王永胜 . 前哨淋巴结时代乳腺癌的精准区域处理: 演进与展望 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2022 , 32 ( 8 ): 680 - 687 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.08.002 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.08.002
QIU P F , WANG Y S . Precise regional management of breast cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: evolution and prospect [J ] . China Oncol , 2022 , 32 ( 8 ): 680 - 687 .
KUEMMEL S , HEIL J , RUELAND A , et al . A prospective, multicenter registry study to evaluate the clinical feasibility of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in node-positive breast cancer patients [J ] . Ann Surg , 2022 , 276 ( 5 ): e553 - e562 . DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004572 http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004572 https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004572 https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004572
ARAGÓN-SÁNCHEZ S , CIRUELOS-GIL E , LÓPEZ-MARÍN L , et al . Feasibility of targeted axillary dissection for de-escalation of surgical treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [J ] . Surg Oncol , 2022 , 44 : 101823 . DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101823 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101823 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960740422001177 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960740422001177
BI Z , CHEN J J , LIU P C , et al . Candidates of genomic tests in HR + /HER2 - breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node without axillary lymph node dissection: analysis from multicentric cohorts [J ] . Front Oncol , 2021 , 11 : 722325 . DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.722325 http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.722325 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.722325/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.722325/full
HARRISON B . Update on sentinel node pathology in breast cancer [J ] . Semin Diagn Pathol , 2022 , 39 ( 5 ): 355 - 366 . DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2022.06.016 http://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2022.06.016
CHUNG H L , SUN J , LEUNG J W T . Breast cancer skip metastases: frequency, associated tumor characteristics, and role of staging nodal ultrasound in detection [J ] . AJR Am J Roentgenol , 2021 , 217 ( 4 ): 835 - 844 . DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.24371 http://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.24371 https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.20.24371 https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.20.24371
SUN J Y , YIN J , NING L S , et al . Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancers with axillary skip metastases [J ] . J Investig Surg , 2012 , 25 ( 1 ): 33 - 36 . DOI: 10.3109/08941939.2011.598605 http://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2011.598605 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/08941939.2011.598605 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/08941939.2011.598605
孙敬岩 , 宁连胜 . 乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结跳跃式转移的临床病理研究 [J ] . 中华肿瘤杂志 , 2008 , 30 ( 5 ): 352 - 355 .
SUN J Y , NING L S . Axillary skip metastases in breast cancer [J ] . Chin J Oncol , 2008 , 30 ( 5 ): 352 - 355 .
MOO T A , EDELWEISS M , HAJIYEVA S , et al . Is low-volume disease in the sentinel node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy an indication for axillary dissection? [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2018 , 25 ( 6 ): 1488 - 1494 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6429-2 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6429-2
ALMAHARIQ M F , LEVITIN R , QUINN T J , et al . Omission of axillary lymph node dissection is associated with inferior survival in breast cancer patients with residual N 1 nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2021 , 28 ( 2 ): 930 - 940 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08928-2 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08928-2
王永胜 , 吴炅 , 刘红 , 等 . 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检规范化操作指南(2022精要版) [J ] . 中国肿瘤临床 , 2022 , 49 ( 22 ): 1136 - 1142 .
WANG Y S , WU J , LIU H , et al . Guidelines for standardized practice of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer (2022 abridged version) [J ] . Chin J Clin Oncol , 2022 , 49 ( 22 ): 1136 - 1142 .
COSTAZ H , BOULLE D , BERTAUT A , et al . Omitting axillary lymph node dissection after positive sentinel lymph node in the post-Z0011 era: compliance with NCCN and ASCO clinical guidelines and Z0011 criteria in a large prospective cohort [J ] . Bull Cancer , 2022 , 109 ( 3 ): 268 - 279 . DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.09.018 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.09.018 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007455121004422 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007455121004422
KORDE L A , SOMERFIELD M R , CAREY L A , et al . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy for breast cancer: ASCO guideline [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2021 , 39 ( 13 ): 1485 - 1505 . DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.03399 http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03399
VAN LOEVEZIJN A A , VAN DER NOORDAA M E M , STOKKEL M P M , et al . Three-year follow-up of de-escalated axillary treatment after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in clinically node-positive breast cancer: the MARI-protocol [J ] . Breast Cancer Res Treat , 2022 , 193 ( 1 ): 37 - 48 . DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06545-z http://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06545-z
MONTAGNA G . OPBC-04/EUBREAST-06/OMA study [C ] . SABCS , 2022 , Abstract GS4-02.
0
Views
2475
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621