Current status and focus of breast reconstruction research in China and abroad: a bibliometric study

Hengyu REN; Shuang HAO; Jiajian CHEN; Benlong YANG; Ayong CAO; Guangyu LIU; Zhimin SHAO; Jiong WU

doi:10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Current status and focus of breast reconstruction research in China and abroad: a bibliometric study

Article | 更新时间：2025-12-31

- Current status and focus of breast reconstruction research in China and abroad: a bibliometric study
- China Oncology Vol. 33, Issue 6, Pages: 581-588(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  复旦大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科，上海市乳腺肿瘤重点实验室，复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系，上海 200032
- 作者简介：
  
  WU Jiong.
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.005
  CLC： R737.9
- Received：27 February 2023，
  
  Revised：2023-05-12，
  
  Published：30 June 2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Hengyu REN, Shuang HAO, Jiajian CHEN, et al. Current status and focus of breast reconstruction research in China and abroad: a bibliometric study[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 581-588.
DOI：

Hengyu REN, Shuang HAO, Jiajian CHEN, et al. Current status and focus of breast reconstruction research in China and abroad: a bibliometric study[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 581-588. DOI： 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.005.

摘要

背景与目的：

国际癌症研究机构（International Agency for Research on Cancer，IARC）2020年全球癌症负担数据显示，乳腺癌已取代肺癌成为全球第一大癌症。本研究旨在对近5年国内外乳房重建相关研究进行文献计量及可视化分析，了解该领域的研究现状与发展趋势，探讨不同国家、不同学科研究的侧重点，为其他研究者提供参考。

方法：

分析Web of Science核心合集中近5年乳房重建研究文献的相关信息，利用VOS viewer 1.6.15软件对纳入研究的作者、国家、机构和关键词进行提取和可视化分析。

结果：

共纳入4 815篇符合要求的文献，近5年发文量呈上升趋势。838篇文献（17.40%）由乳腺外科、肿瘤外科发表，3 308篇文献（68.70%）由整形外科发表，669篇文献（13.90%）由两类研究者合作发表。国内外主要作者所在学科存在差异，国外以整形外科作者为主（74.74%）；国内则是乳腺外科、肿瘤外科占比更高（138篇，44.52%），而整形外科作者（129篇，41.61%）及两类作者合作发文（43篇，13.87%）占比相对较少。国外主要作者形成的合作发文团体更多，达155个，且团队间联合发文更频繁；国内合作团队16个。乳腺外科研究者对于乳房重建中的肿瘤学相关问题更为侧重，而整形外科研究者则更重视自体组织重建相关研究。

结论：

乳房重建领域逐渐受到国内外研究者重视。与国外相比，国内乳房重建领域存在高质量研究缺乏、合作研究较少等问题。国内外乳房重建领域研究关注点存在差异，主要与研究者所属专业差异有关。

Abstract

Background and purpose:

According to the 2020 global cancer burden data of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)

breast cancer has replaced lung cancer as the most common type of cancer worldwide. The aim of this study was to conduct a bibliometric and visual analysis of breast reconstruction related research in China and abroad published in the past 5 years

to understand the research status and development trend in this field

to discuss the focus of research in different countries and different disciplines

and to provide reference for other researchers.

Methods:

Relevant literatures about breast reconstruction were retrieved from the Web of S

cience Core Collection. The VOS viewer 1.6.15 software was used to extract the authors

countries

institutions and keywords to generate network maps of high-yield authors

institutions and high-frequency keywords clustering network.

Results:

A total of 4 815 documents meeting the requirements were retrieved

which showed an upward trend in the past five years. Regarding the discipline

838 documents (17.40%) were published by breast surgery and Cancer Surgery

3 308 (68.70%) were published by plastic surgery

and 669 (13.90%) were jointly published by both types of researchers. There were differences in the disciplines of the main authors between China and abroad. In China

authors from breast surgery published a larger proportion of documents (138

44.52%)

while the number of documents published by authors of plastic surgery (129

44.52%) and the joint publication of both types of authors (43

13.87%) was relatively small. However

foreign documents mainly came from authors of plastic surgery (74.74%). There were more cooperative groups (155) formed by major foreign authors

and more frequent joint publishing between groups

while Chinese authors formed only 16 cooperative groups with less cooperation. Authors from breast surgery focused more on oncology-related issues in breast reconstruction

while in plastic surgery

more attentions were paid on autologous tissue reconstruction.

Conclusion:

Breast reconstruction has gradually attracted the attention of Chinese and foreign researchers. Compared with foreign countries

there were problems such as lack of high-quality research and less cooperative research in China. There were differences in the research focus of breast reconstruction between China and abroad

which was mainly related to the differences in the disciplines of researchers.

关键词

Keywords

references

SUNG H , FERLAY J , SIEGEL R L , et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J ] . CA Cancer J Clin , 2021 , 71 ( 3 ): 209 - 249 . DOI: 10.3322/caac.v71.3 http://doi.org/10.3322/caac.v71.3 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/71/3 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/71/3

郭瑢 , 修秉虬 , 苏永辉 , 等 . 中国乳腺癌术后植入物乳房重建现况调查 [J ] . 中华外科杂志 , 2019 , 57 ( 8 ): 616 - 621 .

GUO R , XIU B Q , SU Y H , et al. Current practice of implant-based breast reconstruction: results from China national practice questionnaire survey [J ] . Chin J Surg , 2019 , 57 ( 8 ): 616 - 621 .

WANG J , XIU B Q , GUO R , et al. Autologous tissue reconstruction after mastectomy-a cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals in China [J ] . Eur J Surg Oncol , 2020 , 46 ( 12 ): 2202 - 2207 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.008 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.008

BAKER B G , IRRI R , MACCALLUM V , et al. A prospective comparison of short-term outcomes of subpectoral and prepectoral strattice-based immediate breast reconstruction [J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg , 2018 , 141 ( 5 ): 1077 - 1084 . DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004270 http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004270

O'CONNELL R L , DI MICCO R , KHABRA K , et al. Comparison of immediate versus delayed DIEP flap reconstruction in women who require postmastectomy radiotherapy [J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg , 2018 , 142 ( 3 ): 594 - 605 . DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004676 http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004676

GAO Y , GE L , SHI S Z , et al. Global trends and future prospects of e-waste research: a bibliometric analysis [J ] . Environ Sci Pollut Res Int , 2019 , 26 ( 17 ): 17809 - 17820 . DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05071-8 http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05071-8

LIANG C , LUO A , ZHONG Z . Knowledge mapping of medication literacy study: a visualized analysis using CiteSpace [J ] . SAGE Open Med , 2018 , 6 : 2050312118800199 .

LIANG Y D , LI Y , ZHAO J , et al. Study of acupuncture for low back pain in recent 20 years: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace [J ] . J Pain Res , 2017 , 10 : 951 - 964 . DOI: 10.2147/JPR http://doi.org/10.2147/JPR https://www.dovepress.com/journal-of-pain-research-journal https://www.dovepress.com/journal-of-pain-research-journal

HO A Y , HU Z I , MEHRARA B J , et al. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2017 , 18 ( 12 ): e742 -e753. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30617-4 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30617-4

LEE G K , SHECKTER C C . Breast reconstruction following breast cancer treatment-2018 [J ] . JAMA , 2018 , 320 ( 12 ): 1277 - 1278 . DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.12190 http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12190

SANTOSA K B , QI J , KIM H M , et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction [J ] . JAMA Surg , 2018 , 153 ( 10 ): 891 - 899 . DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677

叶京明 , 辛灵 , 王宇 , 等 . 推动乳腺癌患者乳房重建的专业化和规范化发展 [J ] . 中华外科杂志 , 2019 , 57 ( 2 ): 88 - 91 .

YE J M , XIN L , WANG Y , et al. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients: specialization and standardization [J ] . Chin J Surg , 2019 , 57 ( 2 ): 88 - 91 .

CHEN Y , CHEN J J , CHEN J Y , et al. Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer patients in China: a survey report [J ] . Chin J Oncol , 2014 , 36 ( 11 ): 851 - 857 .

TSANGARIS E , KLASSEN A F , KAUR M N , et al. Development and psychometric validation of the BREAST-Q sensation module for women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2021 , 28 ( 12 ): 7842 - 7853 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10094-y http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10094-y

WILKINS E G , HAMILL J B , KIM H M , et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: one-year outcomes of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) study [J ] . Ann Surg , 2018 , 267 ( 1 ): 164 - 170 . DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002033 http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002033

COOKE A L , DIAZ-ABELE J , HAYAKAWA T , et al. Radiation therapy versus no radiation therapy to the neo-breast following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous free flap reconstruction for breast cancer: patient-reported and surgical outcomes at 1 year-a mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) substudy [J ] . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys , 2017 , 99 ( 1 ): 165 - 172 .

NELSON J A , CHU J J , MCCARTHY C M , et al. BREAST-Q REACT: clinical reference values for the BREAST-Q in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction patients [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2022 , 29 ( 8 ): 5280 - 5293 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11521-4 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11521-4

LOHMANDER F , LAGERGREN J , ROY P G , et al. Implant based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: safety data from an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in the setting of breast cancer treatment [J ] . Ann Surg , 2019 , 269 ( 5 ): 836 - 841 . DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003054 http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003054

KRASTEV T , VAN TURNHOUT A , VRIENS E , et al. Long-term follow-up of autologous fat transfer vs conventional breast reconstruction and association with cancer relapse in patients with breast cancer [J ] . JAMA Surg , 2019 , 154 ( 1 ): 56 - 63 . DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3744 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3744 http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3744 http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3744

POTTER S , CONROY E J , CUTRESS R I , et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2019 , 20 ( 2 ): 254 - 266 . DOI: S1470-2045(18)30781-2 http://doi.org/S1470-2045(18)30781-2

LOHMANDER F , LAGERGREN J , JOHANSSON H , et al. Effect of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy with and without acellular dermal matrix among women with breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial [J ] . JAMA Netw Open , 2021 , 4 ( 10 ): e2127806 . DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27806 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27806 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2784613 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2784613

DIKMANS R E , NEGENBORN V L , BOUMAN M B , et al. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2017 , 18 ( 2 ): 251 - 258 . DOI: S1470-2045(16)30668-4 http://doi.org/S1470-2045(16)30668-4

RYU J M , KIM J Y , CHOI H J , et al. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: an initial experience of the Korea robot-endoscopy minimal access breast surgery study group (KoREa-BSG) [J ] . Ann Surg , 2022 , 275 ( 5 ): 985 - 991 . DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004492 http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004492 https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004492 https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004492

JAGSI R , MOMOH A O , QI J , et al. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction [J ] . J Natl Cancer Inst , 2018 , 110 ( 2 ): 157 - 165 . DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx148 http://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx148 https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/110/2/157/4157682 https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/110/2/157/4157682

HART S E , BROWN D L , KIM H M , et al. Association of clinical complications of chemotherapy and patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction [J ] . JAMA Surg , 2021 , 156 ( 9 ): 847 - 855 . DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2239 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2239

OLSEN M A , NICKEL K B , FOX I K , et al. Comparison of wound complications after immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction procedures [J ] . JAMA Surg , 2017 , 152 ( 9 ): e172338 . DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338 http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338 http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338

CHO M J , HADDOCK N T , GASSMAN A A , et al. Use of composite arterial and venous grafts in microsurgical breast reconstruction: technical challenges and lessons learned [J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg , 2018 , 142 ( 4 ): 867 - 870 . DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004730 http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004730 http://journals.lww.com/00006534-201810000-00006 http://journals.lww.com/00006534-201810000-00006

ENGEL H , LIN C Y , HUANG J J , et al. Outcomes of lymphedema microsurgery for breast cancer-related lymphedema with or without microvascular breast reconstruction [J ] . Ann Surg , 2018 , 268 ( 6 ): 1076 - 1083 . DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002322 http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002322

D'ANGELO A , CINA A , MACRÌ G , et al. Conventional CT versus dedicated CT angiography in DIEP flap planning: a feasibility study [J ] . J Pers Med , 2021 , 11 ( 4 ): 277 . DOI: 10.3390/jpm11040277 http://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040277 https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/4/277 https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/4/277

CHATTHA A , BUCKNOR A , CHEN A D , et al. Indocyanine green angiography use in breast reconstruction: a national analysis of outcomes and cost in 110 320 patients [J ] . Plast Reconstr Surg , 2018 , 141 ( 4 ): 825 - 832 . DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004195 http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004195 https://journals.lww.com/00006534-201804000-00001 https://journals.lww.com/00006534-201804000-00001

COHEN W A , MUNDY L R , BALLARD T N , et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015 [J ] . J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg , 2016 , 69 ( 2 ): 149 - 162 . DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.013 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.013

Views

4514

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Expert consensus on oncoplastic surgery of breast tumor and breast reconstruction (2022 edition)

Application of CT angiography in delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction

Relationship between breast reconstruction and travel distance

Application of pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap in breast reconstruction surgery

Pedicled latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction

Related Author

Chinese Anti-Cancer Association Committee of Breast Cancer Society,

Chinese Medical Doctor Association Breast Surgeons Committee of Surgeons Branch,

Shanghai Anti-Cancer Association Committee of Breast Cancer Society,

Hua XU

Ying LIU

Yi ZHANG

Tingliang WANG

Tao WANG

Related Institution

Department of Plastic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Xiaogan Hospital affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology

复旦大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科，上海市乳腺肿瘤重点实验室，复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系

复旦大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科，复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系

南京医科大学第一附属医院整形烧伤科

AI问答

⁰