

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 蚌埠医学院研究生院,安徽 蚌埠 233000
2. 上海交通大学医学院附属胸科医院放疗科,上海 200030
Received:24 April 2023,
Revised:2023-07-01,
Published:30 September 2023
移动端阅览
Han WU, Zhangru YANG, Wen FENG, et al. The efficacy and prognosis analysis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for multiple primary early-stage lung cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(9): 844-856.
Han WU, Zhangru YANG, Wen FENG, et al. The efficacy and prognosis analysis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for multiple primary early-stage lung cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(9): 844-856. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.09.005.
背景与目的:
越来越多的多原发性早期肺癌患者选择接受立体定向放射治疗(stereotac
tic body radiation therapy,SBRT),本研究旨在回顾性分析SBRT的疗效及预后因素。
方法:
符合纳入标准的2014年8月—2020年12月于上海交通大学医学院附属胸科医院接受SBRT的241例患者进入本研究,对其中的多原发性早期肺癌患者进行疗效及预后因素分析,并采用倾向性评分匹配(propensity score matching,PSM)后,观察与单原发性早期肺癌SBRT效果的差异性。
结果:
241例接受SBRT的早期肺癌患者纳入本研究,其中多原发性早期肺癌94例,3和5年局部控制率(local control rate,LC)、无进展生存率(progression-free survival,PFS)和总生存率(overall survival,OS)分别为87.1%和71.3%、84.0%和66.9%、93.3%和79.3%。多原发性早期肺癌患者无3级以上肺炎毒性率,合计毒性率为54.3%,24例(25.5%)患者出现2级毒性。18例(19.1%)出现复发,其中多原发性早期肺癌患者出现局部复发、区域复发、远处转移及不确定性死亡分别为3例(3.2%)、1例(1.1%)、12例(12.7%)及2例(2.1%)。PSM前,多原发性早期肺癌患者与单原发性早期肺癌患者的临床特征存在显著差异。PSM后,多原发性早期肺癌患者和单原发性早期肺癌患者各有56例,在LC(
P
= 0.291)、PFS(
P
= 0.954)和OS(
P
= 0.880)方面差异无统计学意义。94例多原发性早期肺癌患者的SBRT预后因素分析显示,年龄≥70岁是多原发性早期肺癌OS的独立危险因素。同时性和异时性多原发性早期肺癌两组间差异无统计学意义(
P
= 0.440)。对于59例首-末次治疗间隔5年内的同时性多原发性早期肺癌患者,肿瘤病灶治疗总个数差异无统计学意义(
P
= 0.232),多次治疗中不同治疗方法差异无统计学意义(
P
= 0.225)。
结论:
多原发性早期肺癌SBRT效果较好,与单原发性早期肺癌的疗效相当,SBRT可能是多原发性早期肺癌一种良好的治疗选择。今后需要探讨多原发性早期肺癌基于年龄和肿瘤生物学行为的病灶局部干预策略和技术。
Background and purpose:
More and more patients with multiple primary early-stage lung cancer are choosing to receive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
and this study aimed to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and prognostic factors of SBRT.
Methods:
In this study
patients who underwent SBRT at Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from August 2014 to December 2020 and who met the inclusion criteria were included. Patients with multiple primary early-stage lung cancer were examined for efficacy and prognostic factors. After using propensity score matching (PSM)
the difference in efficacy of SBRT between single and multiple primary early-stage lung cancer was observed.
Results:
This study included 241 early-stage lung cancer patients with SBRT
including 94 patients with multiple primary e
arly-stage lung cancer. The 3- and 5-year local control rate (LC)
progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 87.1% and 71.3%
84.0% and 66.9%
93.3% and 79.3% in multiple primary early-stage lung cancer
respectively. Patients with multiple primary early-stage lung cancer did not experience any grade 3 or higher pulmonary toxicity with an overall toxicity incidence of 54.3%
and grade 2 toxicity occurred in 24 patients (25.5%). There was a total of 18 (19.1%) recurrences
and there were 3 (3.2%)
1 (1.1%)
12 (12.7%) and 2 (2.1%) patients with multiple primary early-stage lung cancers who experienced local recurrence
regional recurrence
distant metastasis and uncertain death
respectively. Patients with multiple primary early-stage lung cancer and those with single primary early-stage lung cancer had significant differences in clinical features prior to PSM. After PSM
there were 56 patients with multiple primary early-stage lung cancer and 56 patients with single primary early-stage lung cancer
and there was no statistically significant difference in LC (
P
= 0.291)
PFS (
P
= 0.954) and OS (
P
= 0.880). Age≥70 years was an independent risk factor for OS of multiple primary early-stage lung cancer
according to an analysis of the prognostic variables of SBRT in 94 patients with multiple primary early-stage lung cancer. Regarding synchronous (≤180 d) and metachronous (
>
180 d) multiple primary early-stage lung cancer
there was no discernible difference between the two groups (
P
= 0.440). There was no significant difference in the total number of treatments for multiple primary early-stage lung cancer (
P
= 0.232) and no significant difference in the type of treatment for multiple primary early-stage lung cancer (
P
= 0.225) among 59 patients with synchronous multiple primary early-stage lung cancer within 5 years of the first-to-last treatment interval.
Conclusion:
SBRT has a st
rong and comparable efficacy for multiple primary early-stage lung cancer compared with single primary early-stage lung cancer
making it a viable treatment choice. Based on age and tumor biological behavior of the lesion
future strategies and procedures for local intervention of multiple primary early-stage lung cancer need to be investigated.
SIEGEL R , MA J M , ZOU Z H , et al . Cancer statistics, 2014 [J ] . CA A Cancer J Clin , 2014 , 64 ( 1 ): 9 - 29 . DOI: 10.3322/caac.v64.1 http://doi.org/10.3322/caac.v64.1 https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/64/1 https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/64/1
ZENG H M , RAN X H , AN L , et al . Disparities in stage at diagnosis for five common cancers in China: a multicentre, hospital-based, observational study [J ] . Lancet Public Health , 2021 , 6 ( 12 ): e877 - e887 . DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00157-2 http://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00157-2
OUDKERK M , LIU S Y , HEUVELMANS M A , et al . Lung cancer LDCT screening and mortality reduction-evidence, pitfalls and future perspectives [J ] . Nat Rev Clin Oncol , 2021 , 18 ( 3 ): 135 - 151 .
MURPHY S J , AUBRY M C , HARRIS F R , et al . Identification of independent primary tumors and intrapulmonary metastases using DNA rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2014 , 32 ( 36 ): 4050 - 4058 . DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7644 http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7644 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7644 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7644
CHANG Y L , WU C T , LIN S C , et al . Clonality and prognostic implications of p53 and epidermal growth factor receptor somatic aberrations in multiple primary lung cancers [J ] . Clin Cancer Res , 2007 , 13 ( 1 ): 52 - 58 . DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1743 http://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1743 https://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/13/1/52/193399/Clonality-and-Prognostic-Implications-of-p53-and https://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/13/1/52/193399/Clonality-and-Prognostic-Implications-of-p53-and
BATTAFARANO R J , MEYERS B F , GUTHRIE T J , et al . Surgical resection of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer is associated with prolonged survival [J ] . Ann Thorac Surg , 2002 , 74 ( 4 ): 988 - 993 ;discussion 993-994. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03878-x http://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03878-x
ZUIN A , ANDRIOLO L G , MARULLI G , et al . Is lobectomy really more effective than sublobar resection in the surgical treatment of second primary lung cancer? [J ] . Eur J Cardiothorac Surg , 2013 , 44 ( 2 ): e120 - e125 ;discussione125. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt219 http://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt219 https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezt219 https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezt219
STELLA F , LUCIANO G , DELL’AMORE A , et al . Pulmonary metastases from NSCLC and MPLC (multiple primary lung cancers): management and outcome in a single centre experience [J ] . Heart Lung Circ , 2016 , 25 ( 2 ): 191 - 195 . DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.07.016 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2015.07.016
MASCALCHI M , COMIN C E , BERTELLI E , et al . Screen-detected multiple primary lung cancers in the ITALUNG trial [J ] . J Thorac Dis , 2018 , 10 ( 2 ): 1058 - 1066 . DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.95 http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.01.95
ZHAO L S , LIU C Y , XIE G Y , et al . Multiple primary lung cancers: a new challenge in the era of precision medicine [J ] . Cancer Manag Res , 2020 , 12 : 10361 - 10374 . DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S268081 http://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S268081
BOYLE J M , TANDBERG D J , CHINO J P , et al . Smoking history predicts for increased risk of second primary lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis [J ] . Cancer , 2015 , 121 ( 4 ): 598 - 604 . DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29095 http://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29095
HOWINGTON J A , BLUM M G , CHANG A C , et al . Treatment of stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines [J ] . Chest , 2013 , 143 ( 5 Suppl ): e278S - e313S . DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2359 http://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2359 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001236921662127X https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001236921662127X
WALLER D A . Surgical management of lung cancer with multiple lesions: implication of the new recommendations of the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer [J ] . J Thorac Dis , 2018 , 10 ( Suppl 22 ): S2686 - S2691 . DOI: 10.21037/jtd http://doi.org/10.21037/jtd http://jtd.amegroups.com/ http://jtd.amegroups.com/
HAMAJI M , ALI S O , BURT B M . A meta-analysis of resected metachronous second non-small cell lung cancer [J ] . Ann Thorac Surg , 2015 , 99 ( 4 ): 1470 - 1478 . DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.033 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.033
DALWADI S M , SZEJA S S , BERNICKER E H , et al . Practice patterns and outcomes in elderly stage Ⅰ non-small-cell lung cancer: a 2004 to 2012 SEER analysis [J ] . Clin Lung Cancer , 2018 , 19 ( 2 ): e269 - e276 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.11.004 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2017.11.004 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525730417303169 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525730417303169
DETTERBECK F C , BOFFA D J , KIM A W , et al . The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification [J ] . Chest , 2017 , 151 ( 1 ): 193 - 203 . DOI: S0012-3692(16)60780-8 http://doi.org/S0012-3692(16)60780-8
VIDETIC G M , PAULUS R , SINGH A K , et al . Long-term follow-up on NRG oncology RTOG 0915 (NCCTG N0927): a randomized phase 2 study comparing 2 stereotactic body radiation therapy schedules for medically inoperable patients with stage Ⅰ peripheral non-small cell lung cancer [J ] . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys , 2019 , 103 ( 5 ): 1077 - 1084 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.051 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.051 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360301618340483 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360301618340483
CHI A , WEN S J , LIAO Z X , et al . What would be the most appropriate α/β ratio in the setting of stereotactic body radiation therapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer [J ] . Biomed Res Int , 2013 , 2013 : 391021 .
Department of Health and Human Services . Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 [R ] . Bethesda: NIH , 2017 .
SHIN J Y , YOON J K , MARWAHA G . Progress in the treatment and outcomes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer [J ] . Lung , 2018 , 196 ( 3 ): 351 - 358 . DOI: 10.1007/s00408-018-0110-1 http://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-018-0110-1
TURNER K , BROWNSTEIN N C , THOMPSON Z , et al . Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes and survival among early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy [J ] . Radiother Oncol , 2022 , 167 : 116 - 121 . DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.021 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.021 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167814021090691 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167814021090691
GULSTENE S , RUWANPURA T , PALMA D , et al . Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer-A done deal? [J ] . Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) , 2022 , 34 ( 11 ): 733 - 740 . DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.08.027 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2022.08.027 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0936655522003727 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0936655522003727
CHANG J Y , SENAN S , PAUL M A , et al . Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage Ⅰ non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2015 , 16 ( 6 ): 630 - 637 . DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70168-3 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70168-3 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204515701683 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470204515701683
RAJU S C , PETERS G W , DECKER R H , et al . Clinical outcomes and safety profile in the treatment of synchronous nonmetastatic lung tumors with stereotactic body radiation therapy [J ] . Pract Radiat Oncol , 2022 , 12 ( 2 ): e110 -e116. DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.006 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.006 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1879850021003349 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1879850021003349
STEBER C R , HUGHES R T , SOIKE M H , et al . Stereotactic body radiotherapy for synchronous early stage non-small cell lung cancer [J ] . Acta Oncol , 2021 , 60 ( 5 ): 605 - 612 . DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892182 http://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892182 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892182 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892182
NIKITAS J , DEWEES T , REHMAN S , et al . Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage multiple primary lung cancers [J ] . Clin Lung Cancer , 2019 , 20 ( 2 ): 107 - 116 . DOI: S1525-7304(18)30294-8 http://doi.org/S1525-7304(18)30294-8
VERSTEGEN N E , LAGERWAARD F J , HASHEMI S M , et al . Patterns of disease recurrence after SABR for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer: optimizing follow-up schedules for salvage therapy [J ] . J Thorac Oncol , 2015 , 10 ( 8 ): 1195 - 1200 . DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000576 http://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000576
MIYAZAKI T , YAMAZAKI T , SATO S , et al . Surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy for metachronous primary lung cancer? a propensity score matching analysis [J ] . Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg , 2020 , 68 ( 11 ): 1305 - 1311 . DOI: 10.1007/s11748-020-01394-3 http://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01394-3
0
Views
2772
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621