临床查体阴性但超声检查及穿刺确诊腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性分析

丛斌斌; 曹晓珊; 王春建; 邱鹏飞; 孙晓; 陈鹏; 刘雁冰; 赵桐; 张朝蓬; 石志强; 毕钊; 王永胜

doi:10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

临床查体阴性但超声检查及穿刺确诊腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性分析

专题论著 | 更新时间：2025-12-31

- 临床查体阴性但超声检查及穿刺确诊腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性分析
- Feasibility analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer with axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoperative imaging and metastasis confirmed with biopsy
- 中国癌症杂志 2023年33卷第6期页码：574-580
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 山东省肿瘤防治研究院（山东省肿瘤医院）乳腺病中心，山东济南 250117
  2. 山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院），山东济南 250062
  3. 山东大学，山东济南 250100
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "丛斌斌（ORCID：0000-0002-8026-2988），博士，副主任医师。" ]
  [ "王永胜，二级教授、博士研究生导师，现任山东省肿瘤医院大外科主任，山东省肿瘤医院乳腺病中心主任。担任中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会副主任委员，中国抗癌协会国际医疗交流分会副主任委员，中国临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌专家委员会常务委员，中国医师协会肿瘤分会乳腺癌学组副组长，中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺癌学组委员，国家卫生健康委乳腺癌诊疗规范专家组成员，全球乳腺癌大会国际指导专家委员会成员，山东省抗癌协会靶向治疗分会主任委员。于国内率先开展乳腺癌保留乳房手术、前哨淋巴结活检替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术、乳腺病变微创诊断等研究，作为组长单位和首席专家，牵头开展了中国临床早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检替代腋窝清扫术的多中心研究、乳腺癌内乳区前哨淋巴结活检术的多中心前瞻性临床验证研究和新型示踪技术引导乳腺癌内乳前哨淋巴结活检的多中心前瞻性临床研究，研究成果已达到国际领先水平，并参与多项国际和国内乳腺癌Ⅲ期临床研究。以第一作者或通信作者发表论文200余篇，其中在SCI收录期刊上发表论文60余篇，出版专著（译著等）共4部，授权国家发明专利2项，获奖成果共5项，其中国家级1项、部（省）级4项，作为主要负责人承担国家级项目4项、部（省）级项目3项。" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  山东省自然科学基金(ZR2021QH164);北京医学奖励基金(YXJL-2020-0941-0762);北京医学奖励基金(YXJL-2020-0941-0740);北京科创医学发展基金(KC2021-JX-0044-1)
- DOI：10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.004
  中图分类号： R737.9
- 收稿：2023-01-30，
  
  修回：2023-05-16，
  
  纸质出版：2023-06-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
丛斌斌, 曹晓珊, 王春建, 等. 临床查体阴性但超声检查及穿刺确诊腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023,33(6):574-580.

Binbin CONG, Xiaoshan CAO, Chuanjian WANG, et al. Feasibility analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer with axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoperative imaging and metastasis confirmed with biopsy[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 574-580.
丛斌斌, 曹晓珊, 王春建, 等. 临床查体阴性但超声检查及穿刺确诊腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023,33(6):574-580. DOI： 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.004.

Binbin CONG, Xiaoshan CAO, Chuanjian WANG, et al. Feasibility analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer with axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoperative imaging and metastasis confirmed with biopsy[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 574-580. DOI： 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.004.

摘要

背景与目的：

随着腋窝影像和超声引导活检技术的敏感性不断提高，一部分临床腋窝淋巴结阴性患者提升为临床腋窝淋巴结阳性（clinical lymph node positive，cN

）并接受了腋窝淋巴结清扫（axillary lymph node dissection，ALND）。本研究旨在分析，临床查体腋窝淋巴结阴性但超声检查发现可疑淋巴结并通过细针抽吸细胞学检查或空芯针活检（fine-needle aspiration cytology/core-needle biopsy pathology，FNAC/CNBP）确诊转移的患者，是否适合进行腋窝前哨淋巴结活检术（sentinel lymph node biopsy，SLNB）。

方法：

回顾性分析山东省肿瘤防治研究院乳腺病中心20

15年10月—2022年12月经治的原发性乳腺癌患者的病历资料，筛选获取术前超声检查发现腋窝可疑的转移淋巴结并通过FNAC/CNBP确诊转移并接受ALND患者的临床资料。所有数据均采用SPSS 27.0统计软件进行分析，

0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果：

其中158例患者术前超声检查发现1~2枚可疑淋巴结经FNAC/CNBP确诊有转移，ALND后发现43.7%（69/158）的患者存在1枚淋巴结转移，15.2%（24/158）存在2枚淋巴结转移，41.1%（65/158）存在2枚以上淋巴结转移。其中，65例（41.1%，65/158）患者接受了SLNB并进行了ALND，SLNB的假阴性率为0%，1~2枚腋窝前哨淋巴结（sentinel lymph node，SLN）转移的患者中61.5%（40/65）未发现非前哨淋巴结（non-sentinel lymph node，non-SLN）转移，发现1、2、3和3枚以上non-SLN转移的比例分别为10.8%（7/65）、4.6%（3/65）、6.2%（4/65）和16.9%（11/65），差异有统计学意义（

=0.042）。

结论：

临床查体淋巴结阴性但超声检查发现可疑淋巴结并通过FNAC/CNBP确诊1~2枚转移的患者行SLNB是安全可行的，然而这部分患者腋窝淋巴结转移的肿瘤负荷较高，需要更完备的放疗方案和全身治疗计划加强局部控制。

Abstract

Background and purpose:

With the increasing sensitivity of axillary imaging and ultrasound guided biopsy

some clinically axillary negative patients were upstaged to axillary positive (cN

) and received axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). This study aimed to assess the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) in patients with axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoperative imaging and metastasis confirmed with a fine-needle aspiration cytology/core-needle biopsy pathology (FNAC/CNBP).

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study included patients with early breast cancer who had axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoperative imaging and metastasis confirmed with a FNAC/CNBP from October 2015 to December 2022 in the Breast Cancer Centre of Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute. All patients received ALND. The data were analyzed by using SPSS version 27.0 statistical software

and

0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

A total of 158 patients were identified to have axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but one to two suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoper

ative imaging and metastasis confirmed with FNAC/CNBP

43.7% (69/158) of them had only one ALN metastasis after ALND

15.2% (24/158) had only two ALNs metastases after ALND

and 41.1% (65/158) had more than two ALNs metastases after ALND. Among these cases

65 patients received SLNB followed by ALND

and the false negative rate of SLNB was 0%. Positive non-SLN metastasis rate was 0 in the 61.5% (40/65) patients with 1-2 positive SLNs metastasis. One

two

three and more than three non-SLN metastasis rates were 10.8% (7/65)

4.6% (3/65)

6.2% (4/65) and 16.9% (11/65)

respectively (

=0.042).

Conclusion:

SLNB was safe and feasible in patients with axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but one to two suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoperative imaging and metastasis confirmed with a FNAC/CNBP. In these patients

the axillary lymph node tumor burden was high

and exhaustive radiotherapy and systematic treatment were needed to control reginal disease.

关键词

Keywords

references

DONKER M , VAN TIENHOVEN G , STRAVER M E , et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2014 , 15 ( 12 ): 1303 - 1310 . DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7

BARTELS S A L , DONKER M , PONCET C , et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized controlled EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2023 , 41 ( 12 ): 2159 - 2165 . DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01565 http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.01565 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01565 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01565

GIULIANO A E , MCCALL L , BEITSCH P , et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial [J ] . Ann Surg , 2010 , 252 ( 3 ): 426 - 432 ; discussion: 432-433. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32 http://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32

GIULIANO A E , HUNT K K , BALLMAN K V , et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial [J ] . JAMA , 2011 , 305 ( 6 ): 569 - 575 . DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.90 http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.90 http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2011.90 http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2011.90

GIULIANO A E , BALLMAN K V , MCCALL L , et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (alliance) randomized clinical trial [J ] . JAMA , 2017 , 318 ( 10 ): 918 - 926 . DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470 http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11470 http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2017.11470 http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2017.11470

PILEWSKIE M , MAUTNER S K , STEMPEL M , et al. Does a positive axillary lymph node needle biopsy result predict the need for an axillary lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients in the ACOSOG Z0011 era? [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2016 , 23 ( 4 ): 1123 - 1128 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4944-y http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4944-y

丛斌斌 , 曹晓珊 , 于金明 , 等 . 早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的前沿进展 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2018 , 28 ( 3 ): 236 - 240 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.03.011 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.03.011

CONG B B , CAO X S , YU J M , et al. Recent advances in sentinel lymph node biopsy for early stage breast cancer [J ] . China Oncol , 2018 , 28 ( 3 ): 236 - 240 .

曹璐 , 陈佳艺 . 低负荷前哨淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌患者腋窝处理策略 [J ] . 中华放射肿瘤学杂志 , 2018 , 27 ( 6 ): 612 - 615 .

CAO L , CHEN J Y . Therapeutic strategies of axillary treatment for early breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes [J ] . Chin J Radiat Oncol , 2018 , 27 ( 6 ): 612 - 615 .

曹晓珊 , 丛斌斌 . 精准医学时代三阴性乳腺癌治疗的研究进展 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2019 , 29 ( 12 ): 971 - 976 .

CAO X S , CONG B B . The progress of treatment for triple-negative breast cancer in the era of precision medicine [J ] . China Oncol , 2019 , 29 ( 12 ): 971 - 976 .

丛斌斌 , 王永胜 . 激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌治疗现状与挑战 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2021 , 31 ( 8 ): 689 - 696 .

CONG B B , WANG Y S . Treatment landscape and challenges of managing the hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer [J ] . China Oncol , 2021 , 31 ( 8 ): 689 - 696 .

GENTILINI O , VERONESI U . Staging the axilla in early breast cancer: will imaging replace surgery? [J ] . JAMA Oncol , 2015 , 1 ( 8 ): 1031 - 1032 . DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2337 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2337

REIMER T , STACHS A , VESELINOVIC K , et al. Patient-reported outcomes for the intergroup sentinel mamma study (INSEMA): a randomised trial with persistent impact of axillary surgery on arm and breast symptoms in patients with early breast cancer [J ] . EClinicalMedicine , 2023 , 55 : 101756 . DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101756 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101756 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589537022004850 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589537022004850

GUO R R , LU G L , QIN B J , et al. Ultrasound imaging technologies for breast cancer detection and management: a review [J ] . Ultrasound Med Biol , 2018 , 44 ( 1 ): 37 - 70 . DOI: S0301-5629(17)32343-8 http://doi.org/S0301-5629(17)32343-8

ZHOU L Q , WU X L , HUANG S Y , et al. Lymph node metastasis prediction from primary breast cancer US images using deep learning [J ] . Radiology , 2020 , 294 ( 1 ): 19 - 28 . DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190372 http://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190372 http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.2019190372 http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.2019190372

ZHAO R , JIANG H , CAO J Y , et al. Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer by sound touch elastography [J ] . Ultrasound Med Biol , 2022 , 48 ( 9 ): 1879 - 1887 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.05.018 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.05.018

BI Z , QIU P F , ZHANG Z P , et al. Inconsistent radiotherapy effects between primary tumors and axillary lymph nodes [J ] . Cancer Biol Med , 2022 , 19 ( 12 ): 1617 - 1621 . DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0590 http://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0590 https://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/19/12/1617 https://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/19/12/1617

BI Z , WANG X E , QIU P F , et al. Optimization of regional nodal irradiation in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy [J ] . Cancer Biol Med , 2023 , 20 ( 2 ): 89 - 92 . DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0625 http://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0625 https://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/20/2/89 https://www.cancerbiomed.org/content/20/2/89

KWAK H Y , CHAE B J , BAE J S , et al. Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients clinically suspected of axillary lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging [J ] . World J Surg Oncol , 2013 , 11 : 104 . DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-104 http://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-104

LLOYD P , THEOPHILIDOU E , NEWCOMBE R G , et al. Axillary tumour burden in women with a fine-needle aspiration/core biopsy-proven positive node on ultrasonography compared to women with a positive sentinel node [J ] . Br J Surg , 2017 , 104 ( 13 ): 1811 - 1815 . DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10661 http://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10661

VAN ROOZENDAAL L M , VANE M L G , VAN DALEN T , et al. Clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node procedure versus follow-up: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-08) [J ] . BMC Cancer , 2017 , 17 ( 1 ): 459 . DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3443-x http://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3443-x

TINTERRI C , CANAVESE G , BRUZZI P , et al. SINODAR ONE, an ongoing randomized clinical trial to assess the role of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients with one or two macrometastatic sentinel nodes [J ] . Breast , 2016 , 30 : 197 - 200 . DOI: S0960-9776(16)30090-X http://doi.org/S0960-9776(16)30090-X

GALIMBERTI V , COLE B F , ZURRIDA S , et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2013 , 14 ( 4 ): 297 - 305 . DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70035-4 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70035-4

郭瑢 , 李伦 , 张琪 , 等 . 中国乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检现状调查研究 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2020 , 30 ( 3 ): 166 - 173 .

GUO R , LI L , ZHANG Q , et al. Current status of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer in China: a cross-sectional study? [J ] . China Oncol , 2020 , 30 ( 3 ): 166 - 173 .

中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会 . 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版) [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2021 , 31 ( 10 ): 954 - 1040 .

The Society of Breast Cancer China Anti-Cancer Association . Guidelines for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by China Anti-Cancer Association (2021 edition) [J ] . China Oncol , 2021 , 31 ( 10 ): 954 - 1040 .

中国抗癌协会 . 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检规范化操作指南(2022精要版) [J ] . 中国肿瘤临床 , 2022 , 49 ( 22 ): 36 .

China Anti-Cancer Association . Guidelines for standardized practice of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer(2022 abridged version) [J ] . Chin J Clin Oncol , 2022 , 49 ( 22 ): 36 .

浏览量

2528

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

乳腺癌内乳前哨淋巴结活检与患者预后的相关性研究

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结阳性豁免腋窝清扫后区域淋巴结放疗的回顾性研究

早期乳腺癌局部治疗与全身治疗的进展与展望

1~2枚前哨淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌患者治疗策略降阶梯新理念

乳腺癌患者保乳手术后再次前哨淋巴结活检的最新研究进展及展望