
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤预防部,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
2. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院超声科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
3. 上海肿瘤疾病人工智能工程技术研究中心,上海 200032
[ "沈洁(ORCID: 0000-0003-2504-4491),主管医师。" ]
郑莹(ORCID: 0000-0002-6408-8510),主任医师,复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤预防部主任。
收稿:2023-07-13,
修回:2023-09-05,
纸质出版:2023-11-30
移动端阅览
沈洁, 刘雅静, 莫淼, 等. 人工智能辅助超声对中国女性乳腺病灶识别的有效性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023,33(11):1002-1008.
Jie SHEN, Yajing LIU, Miao MO, et al. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound for breast cancer screening in Chinese women[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(11): 1002-1008.
沈洁, 刘雅静, 莫淼, 等. 人工智能辅助超声对中国女性乳腺病灶识别的有效性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023,33(11):1002-1008. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.11.005.
Jie SHEN, Yajing LIU, Miao MO, et al. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound for breast cancer screening in Chinese women[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(11): 1002-1008. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.11.005.
背景与目的:
人工智能(artificial intelligence,AI)技术可辅助影像学诊断。本研究探讨AI辅助超声对中国女性乳腺病灶的识别能力及其应用于乳腺癌筛查的可能性。
方法:
采用平行对照诊断性试验和前瞻性随访的研究设计,纳入至肿瘤专科医院就诊、并行乳腺超声检查的非乳腺癌女性。所有女性首先接受AI辅助超声检查,然后接受常规超声检查,比较AI辅助超声和常规超声识别乳腺病灶的差异;随访1年内乳腺癌发生情况,比较两种超声方式诊断乳腺癌的灵敏度和特异度。
结果:
研究纳入360人,共发现2 504个乳腺病灶,其中AI辅助超声报告2 217个病灶,病灶报告率为88.5%;常规超声报告1 090个病灶,病灶报告率为43.5%。以常规超声为标准,AI辅助超声识别乳腺影像报告和数据系统(Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System,BI-RADS)4级以上乳腺病灶的灵敏度为93.3%(95% CI:80.7%~98.3%),特异度为100.0%(95% CI:99.5%~100.0%);随访发现10例乳腺癌,AI辅助超声和常规超声均判定为阳性的有8例,灵敏度均为80.0%(95% CI:44.2%~96.4%),特异度均为88.6
%(95% CI:84.6%~91.6%)。
结论:
AI辅助超声对于BI-RADS 4A以上的高危乳腺病灶及早期乳腺癌的识别能力与常规超声相当,是一种有效的乳腺癌辅助诊断手段,并具有应用于人群乳腺癌筛查的潜力。
Background and purpose:
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is increasingly being used in the medical field. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of artificial intelligence ultrasound system for identifying breast lesions in Chinese women and its role in breast cancer early detection.
Methods:
A prospective study was conducted on healthy women aged 35-74 years who came to Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from August 2020 to December 2020 for breast ultrasonography. All the women were examined by AI-assisted ultrasound first
and then by conventional ultrasonography. We compared the differences between AI-assisted ultrasound and conventional ultrasonography in identifying breast lesions in Chinese women. One year later
we looked up the hospital medical history and Shanghai Cancer Registration Management System for the final diagnosis of breast cancer.
Results:
A total of 360 women were included in the study and received breast examinations using both AI-assisted ultrasound and conventional ultrasound. A total of 2 504 breast lesions were detected
of which
2 217 were detected by AI-assisted ultrasound
with a lesion recognition rate of 88.5%. Conventional ultrasound identified 1 090 lesions
with a lesion recognition rate of 43.5%. Using conventional ultrasound as the standard
the sensitivity and specificity of AI-assisted ultrasound for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) level 4 and above lesions were 93.3% (95% CI: 80.7-98.3) and 100.0% (95% CI: 99.5-100.0)
respectively. During one-year follow-up
10 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer
and 8 of whom were identified by both AI-assisted ultrasound and conventional B ultrasound. The sensitivity of AI-assisted ultrasound and conventional ultrasound for breast cancer was 80.0% (9
5% CI: 44.2-96.4)
and the specificity was 88.6% (95% CI: 84.6-91.6).
Conclusion:
AI-assisted ultrasound has good identification ability for breast lesions in Chinese women. The recognition ability for high-risk breast lesions (BI-RADS 4A and above) and early breast cancer is equivalent to that of conventional ultrasound
which is suitable for breast cancer screening in large-scale community of women with general risk.
SUNG H , FERLAY J , SIEGEL R L , et al . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J ] . CA Cancer J Clin , 2021 , 71 ( 3 ): 209 - 249 . DOI: 10.3322/caac.v71.3 http://doi.org/10.3322/caac.v71.3 https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/71/3 https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/71/3
ZHENG R S , ZHANG S W , ZENG H M , et al . Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016 [J ] . J Natl Cancer Cent , 2022 , 2 ( 1 ): 1 - 9 .
HABBEMA J D , VAN OORTMARSSEN G J , VAN PUTTEN D J , et al . Age-specific reduction in breast cancer mortality by screening: an analysis of the results of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York study [J ] . J Natl Cancer Inst , 1986 , 77 ( 2 ): 317 - 320 .
NYSTRÖM L , ANDERSSON I , BJURSTAM N , et al . Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials [J ] . Lancet , 2002 , 359 ( 9310 ): 909 - 919 . DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0
SIEGEL R L , MILLER K D , JEMAL A . Cancer statistics, 2020 [J ] . CA A Cancer J Clin , 2020 , 70 ( 1 ): 7 - 30 . DOI: 10.3322/caac.v70.1 http://doi.org/10.3322/caac.v70.1 https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/70/1 https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15424863/70/1
ZHANG X , LIN X , TAN Y J , et al . A multicenter hospital-based diagnosis study of automated breast ultrasound system in detecting breast cancer among Chinese women [J ] . Chung Kuo Yen Cheng Yen Chiu , 2018 , 30 ( 2 ): 231 - 239 .
WU G H , CHEN L S , CHANG K J , et al . Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer [J ] . J Med Screen , 2006 , 13 ( Suppl 1 ): S23 -S27.
BAN K , TSUNODA H , WATANABE T , et al . Characteristics of ultrasonographic images of ductal carcinoma in situ with abnormalities of the ducts [J ] . J Med Ultrason (2001) , 2020 , 47 ( 1 ): 107 - 115 .
杨萌 , 晋思琦 , 朱庆莉 , 等 . 乳腺癌超声诊断技术的发展历程及协和经验 [J ] . 中国科学(生命科学) , 2021 , 51 ( 8 ): 1092 - 1100 .
YANG M , JIN S Q , ZHU Q L , et al . Development and experience of ultrasonic diagnosis technology for breast cancer [J ] . Sci Sin Vitae , 2021 , 51 ( 8 ): 1092 - 1100 . DOI: 10.1360/SSV-2021-0204 http://doi.org/10.1360/SSV-2021-0204 https://engine.scichina.com/doi/10.1360/SSV-2021-0204 https://engine.scichina.com/doi/10.1360/SSV-2021-0204
FEI X Y , SHEN L , YING S H , et al . Parameter transfer deep neural network for single-modal B-mode ultrasound-based computer-aided diagnosis [J ] . Cogn Comput , 2020 , 12 ( 6 ): 1252 - 1264 . DOI: 10.1007/s12559-020-09761-1 http://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09761-1
QIAO M Y , FANG Z , GUO Y , et al . Breast calcification detection based on multichannel radiofrequency signals via a unified deep learning framework [J ] . Expert Syst Appl , 2021 , 168 : 114218 . DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114218 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114218 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095741742030943X https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095741742030943X
GUO Y , HU Y , QIAO M , et al . Radiomics analysis on ultrasound for prediction of biologic behavior in breast invasive ductal carcinoma [J ] . Clin Breast Cancer , 2018 , 18 ( 3 ): e335 -e344. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.08.002 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2017.08.002 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1526820917301465 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1526820917301465
卢伟 , 郑莹 . 肿瘤命名与编码 [M ] . 上海 : 第二军医大学出版社 , 2011 .
LU W , ZHENG Y . Tumor Nomenclature and Coding [M ] . Shanghai : Second Military Medical University Press , 2011 .
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会 . 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版) [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2021 , 31 ( 10 ): 954 - 1040 .
The Society of Breast Cancer, China Anti-Cancer Association . Guidelines for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by China Anti-Cancer Association (2021 edition) [J ] . China Oncol , 2021 , 31 ( 10 ): 954 - 1040 .
ZHANG X , YANG L , LIU S , et al . Evaluation of different breast cancer screening strategies for high-risk women in Beijing, China: a real-world population-based study [J ] . Front Oncol , 2021 , 11 : 776848 . DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.776848 http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.776848 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.776848/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.776848/full
马兰 , 连臻强 , 赵艳霞 , 等 . 基于1 501 753名中国农村妇女乳腺癌筛查的乳腺超声优化流程分析 [J ] . 中华肿瘤杂志 , 2021 , 43 ( 4 ): 497 - 503 .
MA L , LIAN Z Q , ZHAO Y X , et al . Breast ultrasound optimization process analysis based on breast cancer screening for 1 501 753 rural women in China [J ] . Chin J Oncol , 2021 , 43 ( 4 ): 497 - 503
WANG P , BERZIN T M , GLISSEN BROWN J R , et al . Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomised controlled study [J ] . Gut , 2019 , 68 ( 10 ): 1813 - 1819 . DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500 http://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500
ARDILA D , KIRALY A P , BHARADWAJ S , et al . End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography [J ] . Nat Med , 2019 , 25 ( 6 ): 954 - 961 . DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x http://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x
MCKINNEY S M , SIENIEK M , GODBOLE V , et al . International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening [J ] . Nature , 2020 , 577 ( 7788 ): 89 - 94 . DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 http://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6
LEHMAN C D , WELLMAN R D , BUIST D S , et al . Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection [J ] . JAMA Intern Med , 2015 , 175 ( 11 ): 1828 - 1837 . DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会 . 中国乳腺癌筛查与早期诊断指南 [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2022 , 32 ( 4 ): 363 - 372 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.04.010 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.04.010
The Society of Breast Cancer, China Anti-Cancer Association . Screening and early diagnosis of breast cancer in China: a practice guideline [J ] . China Oncol , 2022 , 32 ( 4 ): 363 - 372 .
0
浏览量
2529
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621