乳腺癌外科治疗领域新技术的进展和争议

张钰佳; 马力

doi:10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.04.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

乳腺癌外科治疗领域新技术的进展和争议

专家述评 | 更新时间：2025-12-31

- 乳腺癌外科治疗领域新技术的进展和争议
- Advances and controversies in emerging techniques of surgery on breast cancer
- 中国癌症杂志 2025年35卷第4期页码：339-345
- 作者机构：
  
  河北医科大学第四医院乳腺中心，河北石家庄 050011
- 作者简介：
  
  [ "张钰佳（ORCID: 0009-0007-1866-0364），硕士研究生。" ]
  [ "马力，博士后，主任医师，教授，博士研究生导师，河北医科大学第四医院乳腺中心病区主任。现担任中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会委员，中国临床肿瘤学会（Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology，CSCO）乳腺癌专家委员会委员，中国医师协会外科医师分会乳腺外科专家工作组委员，中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺肿瘤学组委员，中国医药教育协会乳腺疾病专业委员会常务委员，河北省医师学会外科医师分会乳腺学组组长，河北省肿瘤防治联合会乳腺癌专业委员会主任委员，河北省临床肿瘤学会乳腺癌专家委员会候任主任委员。擅长各种乳房疾病的诊断和治疗，尤其是乳腺疾病系列腔镜手术等微创治疗。现担任《中华乳腺病杂志》编委。" ]
- 基金信息：
  
  河北医科大学第四医院科研创新团队支持计划(2023B01)
- DOI：10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.04.001
  中图分类号：
- 收稿：2024-12-30，
  
  修回：2025-03-31，
  
  纸质出版：2025-04-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张钰佳, 马力. 乳腺癌外科治疗领域新技术的进展和争议[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025,35(4):339-345.

Yujia ZHANG, Li MA. Advances and controversies in emerging techniques of surgery on breast cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2025, 35(4): 339-345.
张钰佳, 马力. 乳腺癌外科治疗领域新技术的进展和争议[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2025,35(4):339-345. DOI： 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.04.001.

Yujia ZHANG, Li MA. Advances and controversies in emerging techniques of surgery on breast cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2025, 35(4): 339-345. DOI： 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2025.04.001.

摘要

乳腺癌是女性最常见的恶性肿瘤之一，严重威胁女性的生命健康。精准治疗理念的深化，使乳腺癌外科治疗取得了长足的进展，但新技术、新观点的产生同时带来了诸多争议。随着降阶梯理念的普及，对特定患者人群行前哨淋巴结活组织检查（sentinel lymph node biopsy，SLNB）替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术（axillary lymph node dissection，ALND）成为治疗趋势。前哨淋巴结（sentinel lymph node，SLN）1~2枚阳性且临床淋巴结阴性的早期乳腺癌患者接受术后放疗可安全豁免ALND。初始腋窝淋巴结阳性的患者接受新辅助治疗（neoadjuvant treatment，NAT）后经SLNB证实SLN转阴可安全免除ALND。双示踪法和靶向腋窝淋巴结切除术（targeted axillary dissection，TAD）作为目前NAT后患者接受SLNB常用的腋窝手术分期技术被认为肿瘤安全性一致。预防性乳房切除术是高危女性降低乳腺癌发病风险的重要干预手段，单侧原发性乳腺癌患者接受对侧预防性乳房切除术（contralateral prophylactic mastectomy，CPM）能够降低对侧乳腺癌（contralateral breast cancer，CBC）发生率但未显著改善患者的生存结局，提升评估手段的可及性和建立精准有效的风险预测模型成为临床医师亟需解决的问题。当前乳腺外科技术的发展总体呈现精细化的风险管理和损伤控制的特征，力求在个体化治疗的基础上实现外科手术的安全降阶梯。本文对近期乳腺外科技术进展与相关争议进行汇总和探讨，以期为优化乳腺癌外科诊疗提供新的思路。

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women

which posing a serious threat to women's health. With the deepening of the concept of precision treatment

the surgical treatment of breast cancer has made great progress. However

new techniques and ideas have also brought about many controversies. With the popularization of the “de-escalation” concept

performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in specific patients has emerged as a trend. For clinically node-negative early-stage breast cancer with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN)

ALND can be safely omitted with effective axillary radiotherapy. Patients with clinically node-positive early-stage breast cancer can forgo ALND if SLNB proves that they have been downstaged to cN0 by neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). As the two most commonly used axillary surgical staging techniques in SLNB for post-NAT patients

dual-tracer of lymph nodes and targeted axillary dissection (TAD) are considered consistent in oncologic safety. Prophylactic mastectomy is a significant intervention to reduce breast cancer incidence among women at high risk. It has been confirmed that contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) can reduce the incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) but does not significantly improve the survival outcomes. Enhancing the accessibility of risk assessment methods and establishing precise and effective risk prediction models have emerged as important issues. Above all

the development of breast surgery shows a refinement of risk management and damage control

striving to achieve a safe “de-escalation” in surgical modalities based on individualized treatment. This article summarized and analyzed relevant studies on the aspect of the surgery techniques for breast cancer

aiming to provide new insights into optimizing the clinical diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

关键词

Keywords

references

NANDA A , HU J , HODGKINSON S , et al . Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer [J ] . Cochrane Database Syst Rev , 2021 , 10 ( 10 ): CD013658.

MAGNONI F , GALIMBERTI V , CORSO G , et al . Axillary surgery in breast cancer: an updated historical perspective [J ] . Semin Oncol , 2020 , 47 ( 6 ): 341 - 352 . DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.09.001 http://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.09.001

SCHEEPENS J C C , VAN 'T VEER L , ESSERMAN L , et al . Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a narrative review of the evidence and acceptability [J ] . Breast , 2021 , 56 : 61 - 69 . DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.003 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.003

JI H R , HU C , YANG X H , et al . Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions [J ] . Signal Transduct Target Ther , 2023 , 8 ( 1 ): 367 .

THOMPSON J L , PAUL WRIGHT G . Contemporary approaches to the axilla in breast cancer [J ] . Am J Surg , 2023 , 225 ( 3 ): 583 - 587 .

GIULIANO A E , BALLMAN K V , MCCALL L , et al . Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (alliance) randomized clinical trial [J ] . JAMA , 2017 , 318 ( 10 ): 918 - 926 .

DONKER M , VAN TIENHOVEN G , STRAVER M E , et al . Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2014 , 15 ( 12 ): 1303 - 1310 . DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7 http://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7

DE BONIFACE J , TVEDSKOV T F , RYDÉN L , et al . Omitting axillary dissection in breast cancer with sentinel-node metastases [J ] . N Engl J Med , 2024 , 390 ( 13 ): 1163 - 1175 .

TRIPATHI M , VINEET K . SENOMAC trial: The devil is in the details [J ] . Indian J Surg Oncol , 2024 , 15 ( 4 ): 693 .

BRACKSTONE M , BALDASSARRE F G , PERERA F E , et al . Management of the axilla in early-stage breast cancer: Ontario health (cancer care Ontario) and ASCO guideline [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2021 , 39 ( 27 ): 3056 - 3082 .

GRADISHAR W J , MORAN M S , ABRAHAM J , et al . Breast cancer, version 3.2024, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2024 , 22 ( 5 ): 331 - 357 .

中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会 , 中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺肿瘤学组 . 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2024年版) [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2023 , 33 ( 12 ): 1092 - 1187 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.12.004 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.12.004

The Society of Breast Cancer China Anti-Cancer Association , Breast Oncology Group of the Oncology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association . Guidelines for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by China Anti-Cancer Association (2024 edition) [J ] . Chin Oncol , 2023 , 33 ( 12 ): 1092 - 1187 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.12.004 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.12.004

《中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2022年版)》专家组 . 中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2022年版) [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2022 , 32 ( 1 ): 80 - 89 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011

Expert group of expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China (2022 edition) . Expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China (2022 edition) [J ] . Chin Oncol , 2022 , 32 ( 1 ): 80 - 89 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011

DETZ D Jr , HANSSEN D , WHITING J , et al . Retrieval of the clipped axillary lymph node and its impact on treatment decisions [J ] . Cancers (Basel) , 2024 , 16 ( 17 ): 3001 .

SUN X , WANG X E , ZHANG Z P , et al . Neoadjuvant therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients: results from the PEONY trial [J ] . Breast Cancer Res Treat , 2020 , 180 ( 2 ): 423 - 428 .

SWARNKAR P K , TAYEH S , MICHELL M J , et al . The evolving role of marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB) and targeted axillary dissection (TAD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for node-positive breast cancer: systematic review and pooled analysis [J ] . Cancers (Basel) , 2021 , 13 ( 7 ): 1539 .

MONTAGNA G , MRDUTT M M , SUN S X , et al . Omission of axillary dissection following nodal downstaging with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J ] . JAMA Oncol , 2024 , 10 ( 6 ): 793 - 798 . DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0578

KANAIZUMI H , HIGASHI C , TANAKA Y , et al . PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway activation in patients with ER-positive, metachronous, contralateral breast cancer treated with hormone therapy [J ] . Oncol Lett , 2019 , 17 ( 2 ): 1962 - 1968 . DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9759 http://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9759

YE F G , HUANG L , LANG G T , et al . Outcomes and risk of subsequent breast events in breast-conserving surgery patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation [J ] . Cancer Med , 2020 , 9 ( 5 ): 1903 - 1910 .

GONZÁLEZ-SANTIAGO S , RAMÓN Y CAJAL T , AGUIRRE E , et al . SEOM clinical guidelines in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (2019) [J ] . Clin Transl Oncol , 2020 , 22 ( 2 ): 193 - 200 .

NODITI A , CARAGHEORGHE G , STOLERU S , et al . Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer [J ] . Chirurgia (Bucur) , 2021 , 116 ( 2 Suppl ): 73 - 83 .

SRETHBHAKDI A , BRENNAN M E , HAMID G , et al . Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer in women at average risk: systematic review of patient reported outcomes [J ] . Psychooncology , 2020 , 29 ( 6 ): 960 - 973 . DOI: 10.1002/pon.5379 http://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5379

GIANNAKEAS V , LIM D W , NAROD S A . Bilateral mastectomy and breast cancer mortality [J ] . JAMA Oncol , 2024 , 10 ( 9 ): 1228 - 1236 .

KHAN S A , KOCHERGINSKY M . Contralateral breast cancer remains a complex biologic conundrum [J ] . JAMA Oncol , 2024 , 10 ( 9 ): 1175 - 1177 .

ARUN B N , COUCH F J , ABRAHAM J , et al . BRCA -mutated breast cancer: the unmet need, challenges and therapeutic benefits of genetic testing [J ] . Br J Cancer , 2024 , 131 ( 9 ): 1400 - 1414 .

ALLEN I , HASSAN H , WALBURGA Y , et al . Second primary cancer risks after breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2025 , 43 ( 6 ): 651 - 661 .

SU L M , XU Y , OUYANG T , et al . Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in a large cohort of unselected Chinese breast cancer patients [J ] . Int J Cancer , 2020 , 146 ( 12 ): 3335 - 3342 .

CHAI C S , HELENA WU H , ABUETABH Y , et al . Regulation of the tumor suppressor PTEN in triple-negative breast cancer [J ] . Cancer Lett , 2022 , 527 : 41 - 48 .

HUNT K K , EUHUS D M , BOUGHEY J C , et al . Society of surgical oncology breast disease working group statement on prophylactic (risk-reducing) mastectomy [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2017 , 24 ( 2 ): 375 - 397 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5688-z http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5688-z

YADAV S , BODDICKER N J , NA J , et al . Contralateral breast cancer risk among carriers of germline pathogenic variants in ATM , BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CHEK2 , and PALB2 [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2023 , 41 ( 9 ): 1703 - 1713 .

METCALFE K , HUZARSKI T , GRONWALD J , et al . Risk-reducing mastectomy and breast cancer mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant: an international analysis [J ] . Br J Cancer , 2024 , 130 ( 2 ): 269 - 274 .

CHEUN J H , KIM H K , MOON H G , et al . Locoregional recurrence patterns in patients with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer [J ] . JAMA Surg , 2023 , 158 ( 8 ): 841 - 852 .

DALY M B , PILARSKI R , YURGELUN M B , et al . NCCN guidelines insights: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 1.2020 [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2020 , 18 ( 4 ): 380 - 391 .

AKDENIZ D , MARIA KLAVER M , SMITH C Z A , et al . The impact of lifestyle and reproductive factors on the risk of a second new primary cancer in the contralateral breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Cancer Causes Control , 2020 , 31 ( 5 ): 403 - 416 .

GIANNAKEAS V , LIM D W , NAROD S A . The risk of contralateral breast cancer: a SEER-based analysis [J ] . Br J Cancer , 2021 , 125 ( 4 ): 601 - 610 .

THEOBALD K A , SUSSWEIN L R , MARSHALL M L , et al . Utility of expedited hereditary cancer testing in the surgical management of patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis [J ] . Ann Surg Oncol , 2018 , 25 ( 12 ): 3556 - 3562 . DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6581-8 http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6581-8

李梦欣 , 范志民 , 宋东 . 中国家族遗传性乳腺癌行预防性乳房切除术临床实践指南(2024版) [J ] . 中国实用外科杂志 , 2024 , 44 ( 11 ): 1201 - 1205 .

LI M X , FAN Z M , SONG D . Guideline on the clinical practice for prophylactic mastectomy in hereditary breast cancer in China(2024 edition) [J ] . Chin J Pract Surg , 2024 , 44 ( 11 ): 1201 - 1205 .

中国医师协会精准治疗委员会乳腺癌专业委员会 , 中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺肿瘤学组 , 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会 , 等 . 中国乳腺癌患者 BRCA1/2 基因检测与临床应用专家共识(2018年版) [J ] . 中国癌症杂志 , 2018 , 28 ( 10 ): 787 - 800 . DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.10.011 http://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.10.011

Breast Cancer Professional Committee of Precision Therapy Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association , Breast Cancer Group of Cancer Branch of Chinese Medical Association , the Society of Breast Cancer China Anti-Cancer Association , et al . Expert consensus on BRCA1/2 gene detection and clinical application of breast cancer patients in China (2018 edition) [J ] . China Oncol , 2018 , 28 ( 10 ): 787 - 800 .

CLEGG D J , WHITEAKER E N , SALOMON B J , et al . Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in a rural population: a single-institution experience [J ] . Surg Open Sci , 2024 , 18 : 70 - 77 .

LIM D W , METCALFE K A , NAROD S A . Bilateral mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a review [J ] . JAMA Surg , 2021 , 156 ( 6 ): 569 - 576 . DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6664 http://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6664

浏览量

1382

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

乳腺癌新辅助治疗后腋窝淋巴结转移情况分析

示踪用盐酸米托蒽醌注射液与核素用于乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的疗效对比研究

前哨淋巴结时代乳腺癌的精准区域处理：演进与展望

中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范（2026年版）