中国癌症杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 396-400.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2017.05.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    

研究体板结合真空垫及热塑膜技术与传统臂部支撑固定技术在胸部肿瘤放疗摆位中的误差

杨丽华,龚 敏,许 青,孟怡然,彭佳元,杨焕军   

  1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射治疗科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
  • 出版日期:2017-05-30 发布日期:2017-06-14
  • 通信作者: 许 青 E-mail:qingxu68@hotmail.com

A study on the set-up accuracy by using body plate with vacuum cushion and thermoplastic mask technique in comparison with the conventional arm support technique in thoracic tumor radiotherapy

YANG Lihua, GONG Min, XU Qing, MENG Yiran, PENG Jiayuan, YANG Huanjun   

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032 , China
  • Published:2017-05-30 Online:2017-06-14
  • Contact: XU Qing E-mail: qingxu68@hotmail.com

摘要: 背景与目的:放射治疗已进入了精确放疗的时代,摆位误差成为影响放疗效果的重要因素。通过采用两种不同体位固定方式,即自行改装后的体板结合真空垫及热塑膜的固定装置和臂部支撑装置,讨论分析胸部肿瘤放疗中的摆位误差。方法:选择肺及食管胸部肿瘤患者19例,随机分成两组,分别采用体板+真空垫+体部热塑膜固定(A组)、臂部支撑装置固定(B组)进行摆位和治疗。A组利用二次摆位技术,即先使患者头脚方向的激光线与真空垫上的定位标记一致,再根据患者体表定位标记进行摆位(第一次摆位),最后覆上热塑膜固定,再根据热塑膜上的定位标记移床至治疗位置(第二次摆位);B组利用一次摆位技术,即直接根据体表标记进行摆位。A、B组均利用千伏级锥形束CT(kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography,KVCBCT)采集治疗前﹑后的图像,并与计划CT图像配准,得到治疗前及治疗后的体位误差并进行统计分析。结果:对于两种不同固定方式,A组和B组治疗前误差分别为:X轴(左右方向)(1.06±0.58)和(1.82±0.82) mm,Y轴(头脚方向)(1.31±0.40)和(2.18±1.20) mm,Z轴(腹背方向)(1.28±0.66)和(2.94±1.81) mm。治疗后误差分别为:X轴(0.86±0.54)和(1.29±0.58) mm,Y轴(1.07±0.58)和(1.08±0.45) mm,Z轴(0.98±0.53)和(1.56±0.63) mm。结论:A组误差均小于B组,采用体板结合真空垫及热塑膜固定装置并应用二次摆位技术的患者,在放疗过程中不仅摆位的精确度得以提高,同时也保证了体位的重复性及稳定性。

关键词: 体位固定, 摆位误差, 胸部肿瘤, 图像引导放射治疗

Abstract: Background and purpose: Radiation therapy has entered the era of precise radiotherapy. Setup error becomes important factor affecting the effects of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the setup accuracy of the in-house developed technique of body plate with vacuum cushion and thermoplastic mask (Group A) and the conventional technique of arm support (Group B) in thoracic tumor radiotherapy. Methods: A total of 19 patients with thoracic tumor were enrolled in this study and randomly separated into Group A and Group B. The patients of Group A underwent the secondary set-up: align the marker on vacuum cushion and patient’s body to the room laser, cover the patient’s body with thermoplastic mask and align the marker on the mask to the room laser. The patients of Group B were directly setup by aligning the marker on the patient’s body to the room laser. The kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography (KV-CBCT) was performed on each patient to collect the pre- and post-treatment CBCT images. The CBCT images were registered to the planning CT to analyze the translational error of Group A and Group B. Results: The pre-treatment set-up errors of Group A vs Group B were (1.06±0.58) vs (1.82±0.82) mm in left and right (LR) direction, (1.31±0.40) vs (2.18±1.20) mm in superior and inferior (SI) direction, and (1.28±0.66) vs (2.94±1.81) mm in anterior and posterior (AP) direction. The post-treatment set-up errors of Group A vs Group B were (0.86±0.54) vs (1.29±0.58) mm in LR direction, (1.07±0.58) vs (1.08±0.45) mm in SI direction, and (0.98±0.53) vs (1.56±0.63) mm in AP direction.Conclusion: The in-house developed immobilization technique of body plate with vacuum cushion and thermoplastic mask was more accurate and reproducible than the conventional immobilization technique of arm support in thoracic tumor radiotherapy.

Key words: Body position immobilization, Set-up error, Thoracic tumor, Image guided radiation therapy