Please wait a minute...
图/表 详细信息
NRAS突变型晚期黑色素瘤的治疗进展
赵博伦, 朱冠男
中国癌症杂志    2023, 33 (10): 936-944.   DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.10.006
摘要   (883 HTML20 PDF(pc) (1213KB)(3918)  

黑色素瘤的发生、发展与多种癌基因的激活密切相关。15%~20%的黑色素瘤患者存在NRAS基因的激活突变,携带该突变基因的黑色素瘤具有更强的侵袭性,治疗难度大。由于RAS蛋白突变位点属于弱药物靶标,目前尚缺乏有效的靶向抑制剂,因此临床上多以免疫检查点抑制剂作为NRAS突变型晚期黑色素瘤的一线治疗方案,然而治疗反应率较低。近年来,在NRAS突变亚型中靶向治疗方案的探索主要集中在NRAS下游丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(mitogen-activated protein kinase,MAPK)通路,但结果不一:新型MEK1/2抑制剂tunlametinib,在晚期NRAS突变患者中总体客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)达到34.7%,较既往的binimetinib显著提高;然而泛RAF抑制剂belvarafenib和ERK抑制剂ulixertinib的Ⅰ期临床试验却未能展示出该药明显的优势。此外,以MEK抑制剂为基础的联合治疗也取得一定进展,现有证据表明,分子抑制剂类药物较免疫检查点抑制剂显示出更多的优势:选择性BRAF/CRAF抑制剂naporafenib(LXH254)与MEK抑制剂trametinib联合治疗NRAS突变型黑色素瘤的Ⅰb期临床试验中ORR达到46.7%;细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(cyclin-dependent kinase4/6,CDK4/6)抑制剂ribociclib和binimetinib联合治疗在携带NRAS突变同时合并细胞周期蛋白基因异常的人群中可达32.5%;黏着斑激酶(focal adhesion kinase,FAK)抑制剂IN10018联合cobimetinib的研究结果也表现出较好的ORR(38.5%);但免疫检查点抑制剂程序性死亡[蛋白]配体-1(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)单抗durvalumab联合trametinib方案仅使27.2%的患者达到部分缓解(3/11)。与此同时,部分临床前研究结果也显示出一些转化潜质:如热激蛋白90(heat shock protein 90,HSP90)抑制剂XL888和丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶19(serine/threonine protein kinase 19,STK19)抑制剂均在动物模型中表现出显著抑制NRAS突变型黑色素瘤细胞生长的能力。本文综述了NRAS突变型黑色素瘤的致癌机制及近年来治疗领域的研究进展,旨在展示该亚型患者的治疗现状,对多种新型治疗方法的临床研究结果进行总结和归纳,为当前临床实践和未来联合治疗方案提供依据。


Identifier Target Study design NRAS-mutant mlanoma patients Efficacy Time frame
NCT03013101, NCT02821000, NCT02738489, CTR20160872[25] PD-1 antiboby Clinical data from four clinical trials in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. The efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with cutaneous and non-cutaneous NRAS mutant melanoma was analyzed separately. A total of 206 patients were assessed, including 12 patients with NRAS-mutated cutaneous melanoma and 21 patients with NRAS-mutated non-cutaneous melanoma In cutaneous melanoma, patients with NRAS mutations had a lower overall response rate (ORR) than patients without NRAS mutations (9.5% vs 23.9%). In non-cutaneous melanoma, response rates were 0% and 13.7%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.6 months and 4.3 months (P=0.015), and median survival time (mOS) was 10.8 months and 15.3 months (P=0.025) in NRAS mutant and wild-type patients, respectively 2016-2019
NCT01763164[27] MEKi binimetinib Phase Ⅲ randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial. Patients with advanced, unresectable stage ⅢC-Ⅳ NRAS mutated melanoma who were previously untreated or progressed following prior immunotherapy were randomized (2:1) to receive binimetinib 45 mg orally twice daily or dacarbazine 1 000 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. A total of 402 patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma were enrolled, 269 treated with binimetinib and 233 treated with dacarbazine (1:2) In the binimetinib arm mPFS was 2.8 months and 1.5 months in the dacarbazine arm 2013-2015
NCT01693068[28] MEKi pmasertib Phase Ⅱ multicenter, open-label clinical trial. Patients with unresectable stage Ⅲc/ⅣM1 NRAS-mutated cutaneous melanoma were randomized 2:1 to receive pmasertib (60 mg orally twice daily) or DTIC
(1 000 mg/m2 intravenously). Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints: OS, ORR, quality of life (QoL), and safety.
191 patients with NRAS mutated cutaneous melanoma, 191 treated (pimasertib n=130, DTIC n=61) PFS and 6-month PFS rates were significantly improved in the pimasertib arm compared with the DTIC arm: 13 weeks versus 7 weeks, 17% vs 9%. Investigator-assessed ORR was 27% in the pimasertib arm and 14% in the DTIC arm. However, there was no difference in OS between patients treated with pimasertib and DTIC (mOS 9 and 11 months, respectively; HR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.61-1.30) 2012-2014
NCT00060125[30] Farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI) Three-stage trial design, up to 40 patients, stopped early if first 14 patients did not respond, or first 28 patients had less than 2 responders 14 patients with NRAS mutated melanoma 2 patients presented with grade 3 toxicity and all patients had no clinical response and the trial was prematurely discontinued 2003-2006
Identifier Target Study design NRAS-mutant mlanoma patients Efficacy Time frame
NCT03118817[36] RAFi belvarafenib Single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase Ⅰ extension study 9 NRAS mutated melanoma patients ORR 11%, mPFS 25 weeks 2017-2020
NCT03973151[37] MEKi HL-085 Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ, single-arm, dose-escalation and cohort expansion study 42 patients with NRAS mutated melanoma HL-085 was published in 2023 confirming an ORR of 34.7% 2019-2023
NCT02974725[42] BRAF/CRAF protein kinases inhibitor Naporafenib(LXH254) + MEKi trametinib Phase Ⅰb escalation/expansion study 30 patients with NRAS mutated melanoma The ORR was 46.7%, the median DOR was 3.75 and the overall median PFS was 5.52 months in patients treated with naporafenib 200 mg twice a day plus trametinib 1 mg once daily. 2017-2023
NCT01449058[44] PI3Kαinhibitor BYL719 +MEKi binimetinib Phase Ⅰb open-label, multicenter, dose escalation and expansion study 5 NRAS mutated melanoma patients ORR 20% 2011-2017
NCT01941927[45] MEKi trametinib +AKT inhibitor GSK2141795 Phase Ⅱ non-randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial Efficacy and safety of MEK inhibitors combined with AKT inhibitors in 10 patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma and 10 patients with BRAFWT/NRASWT melanoma The mPFS and mOS of the 10 NRAS-mutated melanoma patients were only 2.3 and 4.0 months. Median PFS and OS for the wild-type cohort were 2.8 months and 3.5 months, respectively. No objective responses were identified in either cohort. The combination of Trametinib and GSK2141795 has no significant clinical activity in NRAS mutants or BRAFWT/NRASWT melanomas 2013-2020
NCT03932253 MEKi FCN-159 Phase Ⅰa/Ⅰb, open-label, dose escalation and dose expansion study 33 patients with NRAS mutated melanoma were enrolled The ORR and clinical benefit rates were 19.0% and 52.4%, respectively. Median duration of response and progression-free survival were 4.8 months and 3.8 months (1.8-5.6 months), respectively. 2019-2023
NCT03284502 MEKi cobimetinib + RAFi HM95573 Phase Ⅰb, open-label, multicenter dose escalation study 9 NRAS mutated melanoma patients Available data published ORR of 40% 2017-2023
NCT03979651 MEKi trametinib+autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine Phase Ⅰb/Ⅱ non-randomized, open-label clinical trial 29 NRAS mutated melanoma patients Results to be further published 2019-2022
NCT04109456 MEKi cobimetinib Phase Ⅰb open-label clinical study Estimated enrollment is 120 patients with NRAS mutated melanoma Results to be further published 2019-2023
View table in article
表1 针对NRAS突变型黑色素瘤的临床试验
正文中引用本图/表的段落
NRAS突变型黑色素瘤细胞对泛RAF抑制剂的耐药与MAPK活化的相关性已被证实,故联合曲美替尼(trametinib)可增强泛RAF抑制剂的疗效[41]。目前正在进行的泛RAF抑制剂联合MEK抑制剂的临床试验有NCT02974725、NCT03284502等,NCT03284502目前公布的ORR为40%(n=9)。此外,选择性BRAF/CRAF抑制剂naporafenib(LXH254)与trametinib联合治疗KRAS/BRAF突变的非小细胞肺癌和NRAS突变黑色素瘤的Ⅰb期临床试验结果[42]显示,接受naporafenib 200 mg每日两次联合trametinib 1 mg每日2次治疗的患者的ORR和mPFS分别为46.7%和5.52个月。除了MAPK通路外,同时抑制PI3K-AKT通路也可产生协同作用[43]。PI3Kα抑制剂(alpelisib)联合binimetinib的Ⅰb期临床试验中ORR为20%[44]。而AKT抑制剂(GSK2141795)和trametinib的联合方案的Ⅱ期临床试验显示mPFS和mOS仅为2.3和4.0个月,ORR为0%,未能产生临床获益[45](表1)。
本综述所阐述的临床研究的具体情况见表1。目前针对NRAS突变型黑色素瘤的靶向和免疫治疗方案均未能媲美BRAF抑制剂在BRAF突变型病例中达到的治疗反应率,但近年来基于MEK抑制剂的部分联合治疗策略已经取得喜人的进展[54]。此外,临床前研究中,热激蛋白90(heat shock protein 90,HSP90)抑制剂[55]及丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶19(serine/threonine protein kinase 19,STK19)抑制剂[56]也显示出很强的转化潜力,有望成为未来NRAS突变型黑色素瘤治疗的突破口。
mPFS: Median progression-free survival; mOS: Median overall survival; ORR: Overall response rate. WT: Wild type. ...
Efficient suppression of NRAS-driven melanoma by Co-inhibition of ERK1/2 and ERK5 MAPK pathways
1
2020
... ERK是MAPK通路中的关键节点,抑制ERK活性可以提高NRAS突变黑色素瘤对MEK抑制剂的反应[38].在NRAS突变黑色素细胞中,ERK抑制剂VX-11e对细胞增殖的抑制作用比MEK抑制剂更明显[39].但在Ⅰ期临床试验中,应用ERK1/2抑制剂优立替尼(ulixertinib),仅13.5%的患者达到部分缓解[40]. ...
Differential activity of MEK and ERK inhibitors in BRAF inhibitor resistant melanoma
1
2014
... ERK是MAPK通路中的关键节点,抑制ERK活性可以提高NRAS突变黑色素瘤对MEK抑制剂的反应[38].在NRAS突变黑色素细胞中,ERK抑制剂VX-11e对细胞增殖的抑制作用比MEK抑制剂更明显[39].但在Ⅰ期临床试验中,应用ERK1/2抑制剂优立替尼(ulixertinib),仅13.5%的患者达到部分缓解[40]. ...
Effect of ulixertinib, a novel ERK1/2 inhibitor, on the QT/QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies
1
2018
... ERK是MAPK通路中的关键节点,抑制ERK活性可以提高NRAS突变黑色素瘤对MEK抑制剂的反应[38].在NRAS突变黑色素细胞中,ERK抑制剂VX-11e对细胞增殖的抑制作用比MEK抑制剂更明显[39].但在Ⅰ期临床试验中,应用ERK1/2抑制剂优立替尼(ulixertinib),仅13.5%的患者达到部分缓解[40]. ...
Combination of pan-RAF and MEK inhibitors in NRAS mutant melanoma
1
2015
... NRAS突变型黑色素瘤细胞对泛RAF抑制剂的耐药与MAPK活化的相关性已被证实,故联合曲美替尼(trametinib)可增强泛RAF抑制剂的疗效[41].目前正在进行的泛RAF抑制剂联合MEK抑制剂的临床试验有NCT02974725、NCT03284502等,NCT03284502目前公布的ORR为40%(n=9).此外,选择性BRAF/CRAF抑制剂naporafenib(LXH254)与trametinib联合治疗KRAS/BRAF突变的非小细胞肺癌和NRAS突变黑色素瘤的Ⅰb期临床试验结果[42]显示,接受naporafenib 200 mg每日两次联合trametinib 1 mg每日2次治疗的患者的ORR和mPFS分别为46.7%和5.52个月.除了MAPK通路外,同时抑制PI3K-AKT通路也可产生协同作用[43].PI3Kα抑制剂(alpelisib)联合binimetinib的Ⅰb期临床试验中ORR为20%[44].而AKT抑制剂(GSK2141795)和trametinib的联合方案的Ⅱ期临床试验显示mPFS和mOS仅为2.3和4.0个月,ORR为0%,未能产生临床获益[45](表1). ...
Initial evidence for the efficacy of naporafenib in combination with trametinib in NRAS-mutant melanoma: results from the expansion arm of a phase ib, open-label study
2
2023
... NRAS突变型黑色素瘤细胞对泛RAF抑制剂的耐药与MAPK活化的相关性已被证实,故联合曲美替尼(trametinib)可增强泛RAF抑制剂的疗效[41].目前正在进行的泛RAF抑制剂联合MEK抑制剂的临床试验有NCT02974725、NCT03284502等,NCT03284502目前公布的ORR为40%(n=9).此外,选择性BRAF/CRAF抑制剂naporafenib(LXH254)与trametinib联合治疗KRAS/BRAF突变的非小细胞肺癌和NRAS突变黑色素瘤的Ⅰb期临床试验结果[42]显示,接受naporafenib 200 mg每日两次联合trametinib 1 mg每日2次治疗的患者的ORR和mPFS分别为46.7%和5.52个月.除了MAPK通路外,同时抑制PI3K-AKT通路也可产生协同作用[43].PI3Kα抑制剂(alpelisib)联合binimetinib的Ⅰb期临床试验中ORR为20%[44].而AKT抑制剂(GSK2141795)和trametinib的联合方案的Ⅱ期临床试验显示mPFS和mOS仅为2.3和4.0个月,ORR为0%,未能产生临床获益[45](表1). ...

mPFS: Median progression-free survival; mOS: Median overall survival; ORR: Overall response rate. WT: Wild type. ...
Combined targeting of MEK and PI3K/mTOR effector pathways is necessary to effectively inhibit NRAS mutant melanoma in vitro and in vivo
1
2013
... NRAS突变型黑色素瘤细胞对泛RAF抑制剂的耐药与MAPK活化的相关性已被证实,故联合曲美替尼(trametinib)可增强泛RAF抑制剂的疗效[41].目前正在进行的泛RAF抑制剂联合MEK抑制剂的临床试验有NCT02974725、NCT03284502等,NCT03284502目前公布的ORR为40%(n=9).此外,选择性BRAF/CRAF抑制剂naporafenib(LXH254)与trametinib联合治疗KRAS/BRAF突变的非小细胞肺癌和NRAS突变黑色素瘤的Ⅰb期临床试验结果[42]显示,接受naporafenib 200 mg每日两次联合trametinib 1 mg每日2次治疗的患者的ORR和mPFS分别为46.7%和5.52个月.除了MAPK通路外,同时抑制PI3K-AKT通路也可产生协同作用[43].PI3Kα抑制剂(alpelisib)联合binimetinib的Ⅰb期临床试验中ORR为20%[44].而AKT抑制剂(GSK2141795)和trametinib的联合方案的Ⅱ期临床试验显示mPFS和mOS仅为2.3和4.0个月,ORR为0%,未能产生临床获益[45](表1). ...
A phase 1b dose-escalation study of BYL719 plus binimetinib (MEK162) in patients with selected advanced solid tumors
2
2014
... NRAS突变型黑色素瘤细胞对泛RAF抑制剂的耐药与MAPK活化的相关性已被证实,故联合曲美替尼(trametinib)可增强泛RAF抑制剂的疗效[41].目前正在进行的泛RAF抑制剂联合MEK抑制剂的临床试验有NCT02974725、NCT03284502等,NCT03284502目前公布的ORR为40%(n=9).此外,选择性BRAF/CRAF抑制剂naporafenib(LXH254)与trametinib联合治疗KRAS/BRAF突变的非小细胞肺癌和NRAS突变黑色素瘤的Ⅰb期临床试验结果[42]显示,接受naporafenib 200 mg每日两次联合trametinib 1 mg每日2次治疗的患者的ORR和mPFS分别为46.7%和5.52个月.除了MAPK通路外,同时抑制PI3K-AKT通路也可产生协同作用[43].PI3Kα抑制剂(alpelisib)联合binimetinib的Ⅰb期临床试验中ORR为20%[44].而AKT抑制剂(GSK2141795)和trametinib的联合方案的Ⅱ期临床试验显示mPFS和mOS仅为2.3和4.0个月,ORR为0%,未能产生临床获益[45](表1). ...

mPFS: Median progression-free survival; mOS: Median overall survival; ORR: Overall response rate. WT: Wild type. ...
Dual MEK/AKT inhibition with trametinib and GSK2141795 does not yield clinical benefit in metastatic NRAS-mutant and wild-type melanoma
2
2018
... NRAS突变型黑色素瘤细胞对泛RAF抑制剂的耐药与MAPK活化的相关性已被证实,故联合曲美替尼(trametinib)可增强泛RAF抑制剂的疗效[41].目前正在进行的泛RAF抑制剂联合MEK抑制剂的临床试验有NCT02974725、NCT03284502等,NCT03284502目前公布的ORR为40%(n=9).此外,选择性BRAF/CRAF抑制剂naporafenib(LXH254)与trametinib联合治疗KRAS/BRAF突变的非小细胞肺癌和NRAS突变黑色素瘤的Ⅰb期临床试验结果[42]显示,接受naporafenib 200 mg每日两次联合trametinib 1 mg每日2次治疗的患者的ORR和mPFS分别为46.7%和5.52个月.除了MAPK通路外,同时抑制PI3K-AKT通路也可产生协同作用[43].PI3Kα抑制剂(alpelisib)联合binimetinib的Ⅰb期临床试验中ORR为20%[44].而AKT抑制剂(GSK2141795)和trametinib的联合方案的Ⅱ期临床试验显示mPFS和mOS仅为2.3和4.0个月,ORR为0%,未能产生临床获益[45](表1). ...

mPFS: Median progression-free survival; mOS: Median overall survival; ORR: Overall response rate. WT: Wild type. ...
Phase Ⅰb/Ⅱ trial of ribociclib in combination with binimetinib in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma
1
2022
... CDK4/6抑制剂瑞博西尼(ribociclib)和binimetinib联合治疗的Ⅱ期队列(n=41)结果显示,mPFS为3.7个月,总体ORR为19.5%,在伴有CDKN2A、CDK4或CCND1基因表达异常的患者表现出更高的ORR(32.5%),因此,携带NRAS突变和细胞周期基因异常的患者从该联合方案获益的可能性更高[46]. ...
InxMed releases data demonstrating IN10018 therapeutic potential in patients with metastatic melanoma at SMR 2022
1
... FAK抑制剂(IN10018)联合考比替尼(cobimetinib)在NRAS突变黑色素瘤患者的Ⅰ期临床试验中ORR为38.5%,mPFS为5.45个月[47]. ...
Protective autophagy elicited by RAF→MEK→ERK inhibition suggests a treatment strategy for RAS-driven cancers
1
2019
... 已证实细胞自噬可保护肿瘤细胞免受RAS抑制剂的细胞毒性作用[48],现有临床试验(NCT03979651)正在评估自噬抑制剂(羟氯喹)联合MEK抑制剂治疗NRAS突变黑色素瘤的疗效,但研究结果尚未公布. ...
PD-L1 blockade in combination with inhibition of MAPK oncogenic signaling in patients with advanced melanoma
1
2020
... 针对PD-L1的度伐利尤单抗(durvalumab)联合trametinib(同用或序贯)方案在NRAS突变患者中获得27.7%的部分缓解(3/11)[49].IMspire170研究对比了cobimetinib联合PD-L1单抗阿替利珠单抗(atelizumab)和帕博利珠单抗(pembrolizumab)一线治疗BRAF野生型患者,发现两种治疗的mPFS(5.7个月 vs 5.5个月)及ORR(53% vs 65%)差异无统计学意义,即使在NRAS突变的患者中,cobimetinib联合atelizumab方案也未能显示出优势[50]. ...
Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase Ⅲ IMspire170 study
1
2021
... 针对PD-L1的度伐利尤单抗(durvalumab)联合trametinib(同用或序贯)方案在NRAS突变患者中获得27.7%的部分缓解(3/11)[49].IMspire170研究对比了cobimetinib联合PD-L1单抗阿替利珠单抗(atelizumab)和帕博利珠单抗(pembrolizumab)一线治疗BRAF野生型患者,发现两种治疗的mPFS(5.7个月 vs 5.5个月)及ORR(53% vs 65%)差异无统计学意义,即使在NRAS突变的患者中,cobimetinib联合atelizumab方案也未能显示出优势[50]. ...
Inhibition of axl promotes the therapeutic effect of targeted inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway in NRAS mutant melanoma cells
1
2022
... NRAS突变黑色素瘤表达大量细胞表面受体酪氨酸激酶(receptor tyrosine kinase,RTK),具有驱动细胞增殖的潜力,例如Axl、ERBB2、c-MET、EGFR等[51-52].索拉非尼(sorafenib,VEGFR抑制剂)联合MET酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(tivantinib)治疗晚期实体肿瘤的Ⅰ期临床试验中[53],NRAS突变黑色素瘤患者的ORR虽然低于野生型或未知状态的患者(20.0% vs 33.3%),但其mPFS却更长(5.4个月 vs 3.3个月),初步显示出TKI联合METi的协同疗效. ...
Toripalimab plus axitinib in patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma: 3-year survival update and biomarker analysis
1
2022
... NRAS突变黑色素瘤表达大量细胞表面受体酪氨酸激酶(receptor tyrosine kinase,RTK),具有驱动细胞增殖的潜力,例如Axl、ERBB2、c-MET、EGFR等[51-52].索拉非尼(sorafenib,VEGFR抑制剂)联合MET酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(tivantinib)治疗晚期实体肿瘤的Ⅰ期临床试验中[53],NRAS突变黑色素瘤患者的ORR虽然低于野生型或未知状态的患者(20.0% vs 33.3%),但其mPFS却更长(5.4个月 vs 3.3个月),初步显示出TKI联合METi的协同疗效. ...
Phase Ⅰ trial of tivantinib in combination with sorafenib in adult patients with advanced solid tumors
1
2015
... NRAS突变黑色素瘤表达大量细胞表面受体酪氨酸激酶(receptor tyrosine kinase,RTK),具有驱动细胞增殖的潜力,例如Axl、ERBB2、c-MET、EGFR等[51-52].索拉非尼(sorafenib,VEGFR抑制剂)联合MET酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(tivantinib)治疗晚期实体肿瘤的Ⅰ期临床试验中[53],NRAS突变黑色素瘤患者的ORR虽然低于野生型或未知状态的患者(20.0% vs 33.3%),但其mPFS却更长(5.4个月 vs 3.3个月),初步显示出TKI联合METi的协同疗效. ...
A first-in-human, phase 1a dose-escalation study of the selective MEK1/2 inhibitor FCN-159 in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma
1
2022
... 本综述所阐述的临床研究的具体情况见表1.目前针对NRAS突变型黑色素瘤的靶向和免疫治疗方案均未能媲美BRAF抑制剂在BRAF突变型病例中达到的治疗反应率,但近年来基于MEK抑制剂的部分联合治疗策略已经取得喜人的进展[54].此外,临床前研究中,热激蛋白90(heat shock protein 90,HSP90)抑制剂[55]及丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶19(serine/threonine protein kinase 19,STK19)抑制剂[56]也显示出很强的转化潜力,有望成为未来NRAS突变型黑色素瘤治疗的突破口. ...
Inhibition of Wee1, AKT, and CDK4 underlies the efficacy of the HSP90 inhibitor XL888 in an in vivo model of NRAS-mutant melanoma
1
2013
... 本综述所阐述的临床研究的具体情况见表1.目前针对NRAS突变型黑色素瘤的靶向和免疫治疗方案均未能媲美BRAF抑制剂在BRAF突变型病例中达到的治疗反应率,但近年来基于MEK抑制剂的部分联合治疗策略已经取得喜人的进展[54].此外,临床前研究中,热激蛋白90(heat shock protein 90,HSP90)抑制剂[55]及丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶19(serine/threonine protein kinase 19,STK19)抑制剂[56]也显示出很强的转化潜力,有望成为未来NRAS突变型黑色素瘤治疗的突破口. ...
Targeting NRAS-mutant cancers with the selective STK19 kinase inhibitor chelidonine
1
2020
... 本综述所阐述的临床研究的具体情况见表1.目前针对NRAS突变型黑色素瘤的靶向和免疫治疗方案均未能媲美BRAF抑制剂在BRAF突变型病例中达到的治疗反应率,但近年来基于MEK抑制剂的部分联合治疗策略已经取得喜人的进展[54].此外,临床前研究中,热激蛋白90(heat shock protein 90,HSP90)抑制剂[55]及丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶19(serine/threonine protein kinase 19,STK19)抑制剂[56]也显示出很强的转化潜力,有望成为未来NRAS突变型黑色素瘤治疗的突破口. ...

/

本文的其它图/表