中国癌症杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 494-500.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2019.07.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字乳腺断层摄影技术中大、小角度曝光的辐射剂量比较

沈茜刚,彭卫军,顾雅佳,鲍文宪,郑晓静,吴 坚,姜婷婷,肖 勤   

  1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放射诊断科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
  • 出版日期:2019-07-30 发布日期:2019-07-12
  • 通信作者: 彭卫军 E-mail: cjr.pengweijun@vip.163.com

Comparison of radiation dose between large and small angle exposures in digital breast tomosynthesis

SHEN Xigang, PENG Weijun, GU Yajia, BAO Wenxian, ZHENG Xiaojing, WU Jian, JIANG Tingting, XIAO Qin   

  1. Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Published:2019-07-30 Online:2019-07-12
  • Contact: PENG Weijun E-mail: cjr.pengweijun@vip.163.com

摘要: 背景与目的:数字乳腺断层摄影技术(digital breast tomosynthesis,DBT)是近几年推出的一项用于乳腺X线摄影检查的技术,可较好地显示乳腺病灶,对乳腺病变的检出和诊断具有重要意义。目前人们多集中于大或小角度曝光的辐射剂量研究,而有关大、小角度曝光辐射剂量有何差异的研究报道较少。对DBT中采用大、小角度曝光的辐射剂量进行分析和比较,以了解DBT检查时运用不同曝光角度在辐射剂量方面的差异。方法:2016年7月—2016年9月,收集临床可触及乳腺肿块在复旦大学附属肿瘤医院进行乳腺X线摄影检查的患者共209例,100例入组DBT-HR模式行常规全数字化乳腺X线摄影(full field digital mammography,FFDM)和DBT的大角度摄影、109例入组DBT-ST模式行常规FFDM和DBT的小角度摄影。分别比较两种曝光角度的辐射剂量差异,并对不同乳腺腺体类型、不同年龄阶段和不同摄影体位的辐射剂量差异进行比较。结果:DBT检查时采用HR模式的平均腺体剂量(average gland dose,AGD)均值2.76 mGy较ST模式的AGD均值1.37 mGy高出50.36%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。DBT检查下对不同乳腺腺体类型比较时,HR模式的AGD值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ST模式的AGD值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对两种模式进行组间比较时,HR模式 b、c、d三种腺体类型的AGD值分别增加了50.16%、51.20%和45.19%,并可见c型腺体的AGD增幅最大,d型腺体的AGD增幅最少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对不同年龄阶段患者比较时,两种模式的AGD值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对两种模式的AGD值进行组间比较时,HR模式5组年龄段的AGD值分别增加了52.17%、50.53%、45.56%、51.54%和49.04%,并可见≤40岁年龄段患者的AGD值增幅最大,51~60岁年龄段患者的AGD值增幅最少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对头尾(cranio-caudal,CC)位和内外侧斜(medial-lateral oblique,MLO)位不同压迫厚度的断层辐射剂量比较时,两种模式的AGD差异值均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对两种模式的AGD值进行组间比较时,HR模式5组不同压迫厚度的AGD值在CC位分别增加了37.07%、47.94%、53.09%、50.06%和49.79%;在MLO位分别增加了35.15%、46.24%、53.26%、49.14%和48.04%;且2种体位均显示压迫厚度40~49 mm组的AGD值增幅最大,压迫厚度≤29 mm组的AGD值增幅最少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:DBT检查时采用大或小角度曝光的辐射剂量是有差异的,且不同乳腺腺体类型、不同年龄阶段患者、不同摄影体位的辐射剂量均有差异,但仍在规定的辐射剂量值范围内,所以DBT检查是一项安全、可靠的技术,临床可根据实际需要开展应用。

关键词: 数字乳腺断层摄影技术, 乳腺X线摄影, 辐射剂量, 腺体类型

Abstract: Background and purpose: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a technology introduced in recent years for mammography, which can better display gland lesions and is of great significance for the detection and diagnosis of breast lesions. At present, most of the reports focus on studies on radiation dose of large or small angle exposures, and there are few reports on the differences between large and small angle exposures. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the radiation dose of DBT exposed at large and small angles, in order to understand the difference in radiation dose during DBT examination at different exposure angles. Methods: Data of 209 patients with clinically palpable breast masses undergoing mammography in our hospital were collected from July 2016 to September 2016. A total of 100 patients were enrolled in DBT-HR mode to take large-angle photography of full field digital mammography (FFDM) and DBT, and 109 patients were enrolled in DBT-ST mode to take small-angle photography of FFDM and DBT. The differences in radiation dose between these two exposure angles were compared, and the differences in radiation dose among different mammary glandular types, ages and positions were also compared. Results: The average gland dose (AGD) mean value of 2.76 mGy in HR mode was 50.36% higher than the AGD mean value of 1.37 mGy in ST mode during DBT examination, showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). When comparing different mammary glandular types during DBT examination, there was no statistically significant difference in AGD values of HR mode (P>0.05). And there were statistically significant differences in AGD values of ST mode (P<0.05). During the inter-group comparison between HR mode and ST mode, the AGD values of three glandular types (type b, type c and type d) in HR mode increased by 50.16%, 51.20% and 45.19%, respectively. The AGD values of type c gland increased the most, and that of type d gland increased the least, showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). When comparing patients of different ages during DBT examination, there were statistically significant differences in AGD values of HR mode and ST mode (P<0.05). During the inter-group comparison between HR mode and ST mode, the AGD values of these five groups in HR mode increased by 52.17%, 50.53%, 45.56%, 51.54% and 49.04%, respectively. The AGD values of patients aged 40 years or younger increased the most, and the AGD values of the patients aged 51~60 years increased the least (P<0.05). When comparing the tomography radiation doses of cranio-caudal (CC) view and medial-lateral oblique (MLO) view under different compression thickness during DBT examination, the AGD values of HR mode and ST mode were significantly different (P<0.05). During the inter-group comparison between HR mode and ST mode, the AGD values of these five groups of HR mode under different compression thickness increased by 37.07%, 47.94%, 53.09%, 50.06% and 49.79% on CC view, respectively. On MLO view, they increased by 35.15%, 46.24%, 53.26%, 49.14% and 48.04%, respectively. In addition, both positions showed that the AGD value increased the most when compression thickness ranged from 40 mm to 49 mm, and the AGD value increased the least when compression thickness was below 29 mm (P<0.05). Conclusion: There are differences in radiation doses between large and small angle exposures during DBT, and there are also differences in radiation doses of different mammary glandular types, patients with different ages and various photography positions, but still within the prescribed scope of radiation dose. Thus, DBT is a safe and reliable technology, and clinical application can be carried out according to actual needs.

Key words: Digital breast tomosynthesis, Mammography, Radiation dose, Glandular type