中国癌症杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (9): 744-750.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2013.09.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

胃癌组织和循环miR-21与胃癌伊立替康敏感性关系的初步研究

徐登诚1,2,刘宝瑞2,沈洁2   

  1. 1.解放军第452 医院内科,四川 成都 610021;
    2.南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院肿瘤中心,江苏 南京 210008

  • 出版日期:2013-09-25 发布日期:2014-02-20
  • 通信作者: 沈洁 E-mail:shenjie2008nju@163.com

Circulating and tumor miR-21 could predict irinotecan sensitivity in gastric cancer

XU Deng-cheng1,2,LIU Bao-rui2,SHEN Jie2   

  1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, The people’s Liberation Army 452th Hospital , Chengdu Sichuan 610021, China; 
    2. Cancer Center, Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210008, China
  • Published:2013-09-25 Online:2014-02-20
  • Contact: SHEN Jie E-mail: shenjie2008nju@163.com

摘要:

背景与目的:肿瘤组织和细胞中的miR-21先后被证实与肿瘤对化疗药物的敏感性有关,高表达miR-21提示肿瘤对多种化疗药物不敏感。外周血蕴含丰富的肿瘤信息,为个体化药物治疗提供了新的检测来源。本研究初步探讨胃癌组织和血浆循环miR-21表达水平与胃癌铂类药物和伊立替康敏感性之间的关系。方法:系统收集35例经病理确诊的新鲜人胃癌标本,采用三维微组织块培养法行两种药物的体外敏感试验;实时荧光定量PCR检测血浆和对应胃癌石蜡组织中miR-21表达水平。结果:血浆miR-21与对应肿瘤组织miR-21呈正相关(rho=0.736, P0.001)。血浆miR-21水平与性别、年龄、病理类型、分化程度、淋巴结转移、TNM分期、肿瘤部位无统计学相关性,但是Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期的miR-21水平较Ⅰ期有偏高的趋势。铂类药物敏感组与耐药组肿瘤组织miR-21相对表达量分别为1.32(95%CI0.731.90)4.06(95%CI1.716.41),差异无统计学意义(P=0.004);铂类药物敏感组与耐药组血浆miR-21相对表达量分别为5.25(95%CI0.1410.64)5.82(95%,差异无统计学意义CI2.279.37),差异无统计学意义(P=0.19)。伊立替康敏感组与耐药组肿瘤组织miR-21相对表达量分别为1.09(95%CI0.651.54)4.94(95%CI2.447.44),差异无统计学意义(P<0.001);伊立替康敏感组与耐药组血浆miR-21相对表达量分别为1.86(95%CI1.082.64)12.42(95%CI3.1421.70)差异无统计学意义(P=0.001)结论:血浆循环miR-21与对应肿瘤组织miR-21水平呈显著正相关,在一定程度上能反映肿瘤组织miR-21的水平。血浆miR-21水平与新鲜胃癌组织对伊立替康的敏感性呈负相关,肿瘤组织miR-21水平与新鲜胃癌组织对伊立替康和铂类药物的敏感性呈负相关。

关键词: 胃癌, 三维微组织块培养法, 循环miR-21, 铂类, 伊立替康

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Mir-21 has been demonstrated high expressed in many kinds of tumor tissues and cell lines. High expressed miR-21 leads to chemoresistance. Circulating miRNA is a novel biomarker for chemosensitivity prediction. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of plasma and tumor miR-21 levels as predictive biomarkers for irinotecan in gastric cancer. Methods: The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) was used to determine irinotecan and cisplatin sensitivity on 35 freshly removed gastric tumor specimens. miR-21 expressions in tumor and plasma were determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Results: Plasma miR-21 was closely correlated with corresponding miR-21 mRNA level in tumor tissues (rho=0.736, P0.001) and was not correlated with sex, age, pathology type, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage or tumor location. Patients with stage -had higher miR-21 levels. The tumor miR-21 expressions in cisplatinsensitive group and resistant group were 1.32 (95%CI: 0.73-1.90) and 4.06 (95%CI: 1.71-6.41)(P=0.004), respectively. The plasma miR-21 expressions in cisplatin-sensitive group and resistant group were 5.25 (95% CI: 0.14-10.64) and 5.82 (95%CI: 2.27-9.37)(P=0.19). The tumor miR-21 expressions in irinotecan-sensitive group and resistant group were 1.09 (95%CI: 0.65-1.54) and 4.94 (95%CI: 2.44-7.44)(P<0.001), respectively. The plasma miR-21 expressions in irinotecan-sensitive group and resistant group were 1.86 (95%CI: 1.08-2.64) and 12.42 (95%CI: 3.14-21.70)(P=0.001). Conclusion: A significant correlation was observed between plasma and tumor miR-21 level. The low plasma miR-21 level could benefit from treatment with irinotecan. And low tumor miR-21 expression correlated with increased irinotecan and cisplatin response rate.

Key words: Gastric cancer, Histoculture drug response assay, Circulating miR-21, Cisplatin, Irinotecan