中国癌症杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 139-145.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2014.02.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

联合奥沙利铂或顺铂二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

戴月娣1,张德祥2,郭伟剑3,江联萍1,吴海霞1,张宁1,肖迷1   

  1. 1.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院闵行分院肿瘤内科,上海 200240

    2.复旦大学附属中山医院普外科,上海 200032

    3.复旦大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032

  • 出版日期:2014-02-28 发布日期:2014-03-07
  • 通信作者: 张德祥 E-mail:dexiangzh@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市闵行区卫生局及闵行区科委课题资助(No:2011MW14,2011MHZ06,2011MHZ25)

Combined with oxaliplatin or cisplatin in second line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

DAI Yue-di1,ZHANG De-xiang2,GUO Wei-jian3,JIANG Lian-ping1,WU Hai-xia1,ZHANG Ning1,XIAO Mi1   

  1. 1.Department of Oncological Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Minhang Branch, Shanghai 200240, China;
    2.Department of General Surgery, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China;
    3. Department of Oncological Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Published:2014-02-28 Online:2014-03-07
  • Contact: ZHANG De-xiang E-mail: dexiangzh@126.com

摘要:

背景与目的:晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancerNSCLC)二线化疗可选择单药多西他赛或培美曲塞,联合铂类能否提高疗效及延长生存尚不明确。本研究比较单药多西他赛或培美曲塞与联合奥沙利铂或顺铂方案二线治疗晚期NSCLC近期疗效、生存期和安全性。方法:经一线联合顺铂或卡铂治疗失败的121例晚期NSCLC患者按321比例随机分组,对照组(n=56):多西他赛75 mg/m2(所有肺癌)或培美曲塞500 mg/m2(非鳞癌),第1天;顺铂组(n=45):顺铂25 mg/m2,第1~3天联合多西他赛或培美曲塞;奥沙利铂组(n=20):奥沙利铂130 mg/m2,第1天联合多西他赛或培美曲塞。3周为1个周期,治疗每个周期评价不良反应,每2个周期评价疗效,回访生存期。结果:3组的治疗疾病反应率、无进展生存期(progression free survivalPFS)、总生存期(overall survivalOS)及不良反应差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。≥60岁老年患者较<60岁患者PFS更长(HR=0.5695%CI0.35~0.90P=0.015)PS评分0~1分患者PFSOS更长(HR=1.5295%CI1.01~2.30P=0.048HR=1.9095%CI1.17~3.09P=0.009)。治疗反应率与PFSOS相关(HR=2.9395%CI2.01~4.26P=0.000HR=2.0395%CI1.37~3.01P=0.000)。化疗后发生贫血患者PFSOS呈缩短趋势(HR=1.5995%CI0.97~2.61P=0.066HR=1.6095%CI0.94~2.75P=0.085),血小板减少患者OS更短(HR=2.9795%CI1.01~8.78P=0.049)。有神经毒性患者PFS呈缩短趋势(HR=3.3695%CI0.92~12.25P=0.066)。二线治疗失败后接受后续治疗者OS有获益(HR=0.3695%CI0.22~0.61P=0.000)结论:二线联合奥沙利铂或顺铂治疗NSCLC患者疗效和生存期无提高。疾病反应、PS评分与PFSOS相关,治疗后发生贫血、血小板减少、神经毒性患者预后可能更差。二线治疗失败后接受后续治疗能延长生存期。

关键词: 非小细胞肺癌, 二线治疗, 化学治疗

Abstract:

Background and purpose: Single drug of docetaxel and pemetrexed as second line treatment is standard treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether combined with platinum can increase the response and survival is still not elucidated. This study was designed to investigate the treatment response, overall survival (OS) and the safety of combined with oxaliplatin or cisplatin regimens as second line in treating NSCLC patients. Methods: Advanced NSCLC inpatients, failure of cisplatin or carboplatin in initial treatment, were divided into three groups at random in 321 rate. Control group: who received docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 (for all patients), d1 or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (for non-squamous carcinoma); Cisplatin group: who received cisplatin 25 mg/m2, d1-3 and docetaxel/pemetrexed; Oxaliplatin group: who received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 and docetaxel/pemetrexed. Every 3 weeks were repeated as one cycle. The side effect was assessed every cycle and treatment efficacy was investigated every two cycles. Follow-up examination was taken every 3 months after treatment. Results: There were no differences in treatment response, progress free survival (PFS), OS and toxicity among the three groups (P>0.05). Old patients (60 years) had a better PFS than that of patients less than 60 years (HR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.35-0.90, P=0.015). Patients with performance score 0-1 had a better PFS and OS (HR=1.52, 95%CI: 1.01-2.30, P=0.048; HR=1.90, 95%CI: 1.17-3.09, P=0.009). Treatment response had relation to PFS and OS (HR=2.93, 95%CI: 2.01-4.26, P=0.000; HR=2.03, 95%CI: 1.37-3.01, P=0.000). Patients with anemia after treatment tended to have a worse PFS and OS (HR=1.59, 95%CI: 0.97-2.61, P=0.066; HR=1.60, 95%CI: 0.94-2.75, P=0.085). Patients with thrombocytopenia after therapy had a worse OS (HR=2.97, 95%CI: 1.01-8.78, P=0.049). Patients with neural toxicity after chemotherapy tended to have a worse PFS (HR=3.36, 95%CI: 0.92-12.25, P=0.066). Patients received post treatment after second line therapy had a better OS (HR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.22-0.61, P=0.000). Conclusion: Combined with oxaliplatin or cisplatin as second line treatment can’t improve the response and survival in NSCLC patient. Treatment response and PS are prognostic factors to NSCLC patients’ PFS and OS. Patients with treatment related anemia might have a worse survival. Post therapy after failure to second line chemotherapy can prolong the survival.

Key words: Non-small cell lung cancer, Second line treatment, Chemotherapy