中国癌症杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 102-108.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2017.02.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

非整倍体与肿瘤细胞致瘤性关系的初步研究

康燕燕,徐 阳   

  1. 上海市医药学校,上海 200135
  • 出版日期:2017-02-28 发布日期:2017-03-22
  • 通信作者: 徐 阳 E-mail: 13311726825@189.cn

Preliminary study of the relationship between aneuploidy and tumorigenicity of tumor cells

KANG Yanyan, XU Yang   

  1. Shanghai Pharmaceutical School, Shanghai 200135, China
  • Published:2017-02-28 Online:2017-03-22
  • Contact: XU Yang E-mail: 13311726825@189.cn

摘要: 背景与目的:非整倍体与肿瘤形成有关,本研究旨在探讨非整倍体与肿瘤细胞致瘤性的关系。方法:C3和C5细胞系是来自于同一淋巴瘤细胞系的两个亚克隆,采用CCK-8检测2个淋巴瘤细胞系C3和C5的增殖能力;应用常规染色体分析法检测这些细胞系的核型;采用软琼脂克隆形成实验检测这些细胞系的体外致瘤能力;采用Transwell小室检测这些细胞系的侵袭转移能力;通过小鼠体内成瘤实验检测这些细胞系的体内致瘤能力。结果:两个细胞系中C3增殖能力强于C5,差异有统计学意义。核型分析结果表明,这两个细胞系都是非整倍体核型,细胞系C3的众数范围是38~78,C5的众数范围是28~50,C3细胞系中亚二倍体、二倍体和超二倍体所占比例分别为20.33%、8.47%和71.2%,C5细胞系中亚二倍体、二倍体和超二倍体所占比例分别为11.11%、86.42%和2.47%。C3和C5细胞系的非整倍体细胞比例分别为95.73%和13.58%。C3细胞系可以在软琼脂中形成克隆,而C5细胞系未能形成克隆。在体外,C3细胞系的侵袭转移能力强于C5细胞系。体内致瘤实验结果表明,C3细胞系恶性程度较高,体内致瘤能力明显强于C5细胞系,C3细胞系在体内的转移灶较多,在肝脏和肾脏均有转移灶点,而C5细胞系只在肾脏出现转移灶点。结论:非整倍体与肿瘤细胞致瘤性之间存在相关性,非整倍体对细胞的恶性转化及肿瘤发生具有重要贡献。

关键词: 非整倍体, 致瘤致瘤性, 核型, 增殖能力, 侵袭转移能力

Abstract: Background and purpose: Aneuploidy is associated with tumor formation. This study aimed to study the relationship between aneuploidy and tumorigenicity of tumor cells. Methods: The proliferations of C3 and C5 cell lines were tested by CCK-8 assay. Regular chromosome assay was used to analyze the karyotypes of the 2 cell lines. The tumorigenicity of C3 and C5 cell lines was tested by soft agar colony formation assay in vitro. The invasion and metastasis of C3 and C5 cell lines were detected by transwell chamber. The tumorigenicity of C3 and C5 cell lines was tested by xenograft in vivo. Results: The proliferative ability of C3 was stronger than that of C5. The difference was statistically significant. The karyotype assay showed that the karyptypes of the C3 and C5 cell lines were all aneuploid and their model numbers were 38-78 for C3 cell line and 28-50 for C5 cell line respectively. The proportions of C3 hypodiploid, diploid and hyperdiploid were 20.33%, 8.47%, and 71.2%, respectively. The proportions of C5 hypodiploid, diploid and hyperdiploid were 11.11%, 86.42%, and 2.47 %, respectively. The proportions of aneuploid C3 and C5 were 95.73% and 13.58%, respectively. C3 cell line could form colonies in soft agar, while C5 cell line failed to form colonies. The invasion and metastasis of C3 was stronger than that of C5 in vitro. The results showed that the tumorigenicity of C3 cell line was stronger than that of C5 cell line in vivo. Liver and kidney metastases from C3 were observed, while the C5 only spread to the kidneys. Conclusion: Aneuploidy may not be the only reason for the tumorigenicity of cancer cells. There is a correlation between aneuploidy and tumorigenicity of tumor cells. Aneuploidy contributes to malignant transformation and tumorigenesis of tumor cells.

Key words: Aneuploidy, Tumorigenicity, Karyotype, Proliferation, Invasion and metastasis