中国癌症杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1133-1146.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.12.001
收稿日期:
2022-11-22
修回日期:
2022-12-27
出版日期:
2022-12-30
发布日期:
2023-02-02
通信作者:
朱冠男(ORCID: 0000-0002-2980-0074),副主任医师。
作者简介:
徐 宇(ORCID:0000-0002-0894-5311),副主任医师。基金资助:
XU Yu1(), CHEN Yong1, YANG Jilong2,3, ZHU Guannan4(
)
Received:
2022-11-22
Revised:
2022-12-27
Published:
2022-12-30
Online:
2023-02-02
Contact:
ZHU Guannan
文章分享
摘要:
黑色素瘤是一种恶性程度极高的肿瘤,早期黑色素瘤经手术切除多可治愈,但对于高危型病例(ⅡB~Ⅳ期),辅助治疗是延长患者生命、改善预后的重要手段。近年来随着系统治疗药物的蓬勃发展,对于Ⅲ期可切除病例的围手术期治疗理念不断发生变化。本文着眼于外科手术规范及对预后的影响、术后辅助治疗选择、新辅助治疗的进展等热点问题进行梳理,并结合来源于中国患者的治疗数据进行分析讨论,希望为中国Ⅲ期黑色素瘤的围手术期治疗选择提供新的思路。
中图分类号:
徐宇, 陈勇, 杨吉龙, 朱冠男. Ⅲ期黑色素瘤围手术期治疗的现状与展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(12): 1133-1146.
XU Yu, CHEN Yong, YANG Jilong, ZHU Guannan. Current status and prospect of perioperative treatment of stage Ⅲ melanoma[J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(12): 1133-1146.
表1
正在进行的Ⅲ期恶性黑色素瘤新辅助治疗研究汇总"
NCT No. | Title | Research status | Treatment method | Main outcome indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|
NCT04207086 | A phase Ⅱ study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for resectable stage Ⅲ melanoma (Neo PeLe) | Active, not recruiting | Pembrolizumab+lenvatinib 6 weeks; Surgery; Pembrolizumab 46 weeks | ① pCR rate; ② Anti-tumor immune response |
NCT03842943 | Neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy for stage Ⅲ melanoma | Recruiting | Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC)+ pembrolizumab before surgery, T-VEC is injected into the palpable lymph node once every 3 weeks for 6 months or until the target lesion is completely relieved; Pembrolizumab was used once every 3 weeks for 6 consecutive months and continued to be used for 1 year after operation | pCR rate |
NCT04330430 | Neo-adjuvant T-VEC+nivolumab combination therapy for resectable early metastatic (stage ⅢB/C/D-Ⅳ M1a) melanoma with injectable disease (NIVEC) | Recruiting | T-VEC+nivolumab before surgery | pCR rate |
NCT04331093 | Neoadjuvant SHR-1210 plus apatinib for resectable stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ acral melanoma | Recruiting | SHR-1210+apatinib before surgery | pCR rate |
NCT03618641 | CMP-001 in combination with nivolumab in stage ⅢB/C/D melanoma patients with clinically apparent lymph node disease | Active, not recruiting | Nivolumab+CMP-001 before surgery | mpCR rate |
NCT04197882 | Clinical study to evaluate OrienX010 in combination with toripalimab as neoadjuvant treatment in advanced melanoma | Active, not recruiting | OrienX010+toripalimab before surgery, toripalimab after surgery | pCR rate |
NCT05176470 | Neoadjuvant admin autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced melanoma patients | Recruiting | Pembrolizumab+cyclophosphamide+ fludarabine before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery | ① Feasibility of MK-3475 and LN-144/Lifileucel as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with ⅢB-D melanoma; ② Incidence rate of grade 3 and above adverse reactions (immune-related and unrelated) |
NCT04949113 | Neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab versus standard adjuvant nivolumab in macroscopic stage Ⅲ melanoma (NADINA) | Recruiting | Trial group: Neoadjuvant ipilimumab+ nivolumab after surgery; Control group: Nivolumab after surgery | EFS |
NCT04139902 | Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor dostarlimab (TSR-042) vs combination of Tim-3 inhibitor cobolimab (TSR-022) and PD-1 inhibitor dostarlimab (TSR-042) in melanoma (Neo-MEL-T) | Recruiting | Trial group: Dostarlimab (TSR-042) before surgery combined TSR-022; Control group: Dostarlimab (TSR-042) | mpCR rate |
NCT04708418 | A study evaluating whether pembrolizumab alone or in combination with CMP-001 improves efficacy in patients with operable melanoma | Recruiting | Group 1: Pembrolizumab before surgery,pembrolizumab after surgery; Group 2: CMP-001+ pembrolizumab before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery | pCR rate |
NCT03698019 | A study to compare the administration of pembrolizumab after surgery versus administration both before and after surgery for high-risk melanoma | Active, not recruiting | Control group: Pembrolizumab after surgery; Trial group: Pembrolizumab before surgery+pembrolizumab after surgery | EFS |
NCT03567889 | Efficacy of daromun neoadjuvant intratumoral treatment in clinical stage ⅢB/C melanoma patients (NeoDREAM) | Recruiting | Trial group: Daromun before surgery+ postoperative adjuvant therapy; Control group: Postoperative adjuvant therapy | RFS |
NCT02938299 | Neoadjuvant L19IL2/L19TNF-pivotal study | Recruiting | Trial group: Neoadjuvant therapy L19IL2/L19TNF+surgery; Control group: Surgery | RFS rate |
NCT04401995 | Study of TLR9 agonist vidutolimod (CMP-001) in combination with nivolumab vs nivolumab | Recruiting | Trial group 1: Nivolumab+vidutolimod (CMP-001) + [18F]F-AraG PET/CT; Trial group 2: Nivolumab+ [18F]F-AraG PET/CT | mpCR rate |
NCT03554083 | NeoACTIVATE: Neoadjuvant therapy for patients with high risk stage Ⅲ melanoma | Recruiting | Trial group 1: Before surgery, vemurafenib +cobimetinib+atezolizumab; Trial group 2: Before surgery, cobimetinib+ atezolizumab; Trial group 3: Before surgery, atezolizumab+tiragolumab | ① pCR rate of stage Ⅲ BRAF mutation patients (neoadjuvant therapy); ② pCR rate of stage Ⅲ BRAF wild type patients (neoadjuvant therapy); ③ Median RFS (adjuvant therapy) |
NCT02977052 | Optimal neoadjuvant combination scheme of ipilimumab and nivolumab | Active, not recruiting | Trial group 1: Before surgery, ipilimumab 3 mg/kg+nivolumab 1 mg/kg; Trial group 2: Before surgery, ipilimumab 1 mg/kg+nivolumab 3 mg/kg; Trial group 3: Before surgery, ipilimumab 3 mg/kg+nivolumab 3 mg/kg | ① Immune-related advers effects; ② Response rate (RECIST 1.1) ③ pCR rate; ④ The draining lymph node reaches pCR or npCR; ⑤ Or npCR, and 24-month RFS rate of patients who did not receive CLND; ⑥ No pCR, nivolumab after surgery+radiotherapy/BRAFV600E mutation patients recedved dabrafenib+trametinib for 24 months, RFS rate |
NCT04133948 | Multicenter phase 1b trial testing the neoadjuvant combination of domatinostat, nivolumab and ipilimumab in IFN-gamma signature-low and IFN-gamma signature-high RECIST 1.1-measurable stage Ⅲ cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma (DONIMI) | Active, not recruiting | Trial group 1: High IFN-gamma level, nivolumab before surgery; Trial group 2:High IFN-gamma level, nivolumab+domatinostat before surgery; Trial group 3: Low IFN-gamma level, nivolumab+domatinostat before surgery; Trial group 4: Low IFN-gamma level, nivolumab+ipilimumab+domatinostat before surgery | ① Security (measured by complying with the time design in the research scheme); ② Scheme feasibility is measured by complying with the time design in the research scheme) |
NCT04303169 | Substudy 02C: safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in combination with investigational agents or pembrolizumab alone in participants with stage Ⅲ melanoma who are candidates for neoadjuvant therapy (MK-3475-02C/KEYMAKER-U02) | Recruiting | Group 1: Pembrolizumab+vibostolimab before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery; Group 2:Pembrolizumab+V937 before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery; Group 3: Pembrolizumab before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery; Group 4: Pembrolizumab+MK-4830 before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery; Group 5: Favezelimab+pembrolizumab before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery; Group 6: Pembrolizumab+all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) before surgery, pembrolizumab after surgery | ① Adverse reaction; ② Proportion of patients who stopped the study due to adverse reaction; ③ pCR rate |
NCT03769155 | VX15/2503 with or without ipilimumab and/or nivolumab in patients with resectable stage ⅢB-D melanoma | Recruiting | Trial group 1: VX15/2503+nivolumab before surgery +surgery; Trial group 2: VX15/2503+ipilimumab before surgery +surgery; Trial group 3: VX15/2503+nivolumab +ipilimumab before surgery+surgery; Trial group 4: Nivolumab before surgery+surgery Control group: Surgery | Analysis of biomarker parameters: infiltration degree of CD8+T cells |
NCT02231775 | Dabrafenib and trametinib before and after surgery in treating patients with stage ⅢB-C melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation | Recruiting | Treatment (dabrafenib, trametinib and surgery); Neoadjuvant therapy (dabrafenib+ trametinib)+surgery; 1 week after surgery. If no disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred, continue dabrafenib+trametinib for 44 weeks | RFS |
NCT01972347 | Neoadjuvant dabrafenib+ trametinib for AJCC stage ⅢB-C BRAFV600 mutation positive melanoma | Active, not recruiting | Dabrafenib+trametinib before surgery | After 12 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy, proportion of surviving melanoma tissues in lymph nodes or metastatic tumor tissues compared with baseline |
NCT04310397 | Dabrafenib, trametinib, and spartalizumab for the treatment of BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutation positive stage ⅢB/C/D melanoma (Neo PeLe) | Active, not recruiting | Single arm study: Neoadjuvant therapy dabrafenib+trametinib, pCR patients after surgery could be treated with dabrafenib+trametinib; non-pCR patients treated with spartalizumab+dabrafenib+ trametinib | RFS rate |
NCT04221438 | A phase Ⅱ neoadjuvant study of encorafenib with binimetinib in patients with resectable locoregional metastases from cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma (stage Ⅲ N1B/C/D) | Recruiting | 18F-FLT+encorafenib+binimetinib before surgery, encorafenib+binimetinib after surgery | ① pCR rate; ② 18F-FLT PET/CT intake changes from baseline after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy |
NCT02858921 | Neoadjuvant dabrafenib, trametinib and/or pembrolizumab in BRAF mutant resectable stage Ⅲ melanoma (Neo Trio) | Active, not recruiting | Group 1: Dabrafenib+trametinib, pembrolizumab sequential therapy; Dabrafenib 150 mg orally, bid+trainenib 2 mg, qd, 1 week; Pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) was then injected intravenously at weeks 1, 3 and 6; Surgery; Pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) every 3 weeks from the 6th week, for 46 weeks; Group 2: Dabrafenib+trametinib, combined with pembrolizumab; Dabrafenib 150 mg orally, bid+trametinib 2 mg orally, qd+pembrolizumab 200 mg iv, every 3 weeks for 6 weeks, surgery, pembrolizumab 46 weeks after surgery; Group 3: Pembrolizumab; Pembrolizumab 200 mg iv, once every 3 weeks, surgery at the 6th week, and continue to use until the 52nd week | pCR rate treated for 6 weeks |
NCT05097378 | Perioperative encobini in BRAFV600 mutant stage Ⅲ (B/C/D) or oligometastatic stage Ⅳ melanoma (PREMIUM) | Not yet recruiting | Group 1: Before surgery, encorafeni+ binimetinib 8 weeks; Surgery; Encorafeni+binimetinib 44 weeks; Group 2: Surgery+the standard adjuvant treatment method selected by the researchers after surgery | pCR rate |
[1] | 中国抗癌协会肉瘤专业委员会软组织肉瘤及恶性黑色素瘤学组. 皮肤和肢端恶性黑色素瘤的外科治疗规范中国专家共识1.0[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2020, 42(2): 81-93. |
Group of Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Malignant Melanoma, Sarcoma Professional Committee of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association. Chinese expert consensus on the surgical treatment of cutaneous/acral melanoma V1.0[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2020, 42(2): 81-93. | |
[2] |
MORTON D L, THOMPSON J F, COCHRAN A J, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(7): 599-609.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310460 |
[3] |
FARIES M B, THOMPSON J F, COCHRAN A J, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(23): 2211-2222.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613210 |
[4] |
LEITER U, STADLER R, MAUCH C, et al. Final analysis of DeCOG-SLT trial: no survival benefit for complete lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma with positive sentinel node[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(32): 3000-3008.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02306 pmid: 31557067 |
[5] |
WEI X T, WU D, LI H, et al. The clinicopathological and survival profiles comparison across primary sites in acral melanoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2020, 27(9): 3478-3485.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08418-5 pmid: 32253677 |
[6] |
HUANG K, FAN J, MISRA S. Acral lentiginous melanoma: Incidence and survival in the United States, 2006-2015, an analysis of the SEER registry[J]. J Surg Res, 2020, 251: 329-339.
doi: S0022-4804(20)30097-4 pmid: 32208196 |
[7] | MANDALÀ M, RUTKOWSKI P, GALLI F, et al. Acral lentiginous melanoma histotype predicts outcome in clinical stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ melanoma patients: an international multicenter study[J]. ESMO Open, 2022, 7(3): 100469. |
[8] | 徐宇, 朱蕙燕, 陈勇, 等. 前哨淋巴结活检在中国皮肤和肢端恶性黑色素瘤患者诊治中的临床意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2018, 28(11): 819-826. |
XU Y, ZHU H Y, CHEN Y, et al. The clinical significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the Chinese patients with cutaneous and acral melanoma[J]. China Oncol, 2018, 28(11): 819-826. | |
[9] | SUN W, XU Y, YANG J L, et al. The prognostic significance of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cutaneous and acral melanoma patients-a multicenter retrospective study[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2020, 40(11): 586-597. |
[10] |
BHAVE P, PALLAN L, LONG G V, et al. Melanoma recurrence patterns and management after adjuvant targeted therapy: a multicentre analysis[J]. Br J Cancer, 2021, 124(3): 574-580.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01121-y |
[11] |
OWEN C N, SHOUSHTARI A N, CHAUHAN D, et al. Management of early melanoma recurrence despite adjuvant anti-PD-1 antibody therapy[J]. Ann Oncol, 2020, 31(8): 1075-1082.
doi: S0923-7534(20)39788-X pmid: 32387454 |
[12] | WEBER J S, SCHADENDORF D, DEL VECCHIO M, et al. Adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage ⅢB-D or stage Ⅳ melanoma (CheckMate 915)[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022: JCO2200533. |
[13] |
LARKIN J, WEBER J, DEL VECCHIO M, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab (CheckMate 238 trial): reassessment of 4-year efficacy outcomes in patients with stage Ⅲ melanoma per AJCC-8 staging criteria[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2022, 173: 285-296.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.041 |
[14] |
COCHRAN A J, WEN D R, HUANG R R, et al. Sentinel lymph node melanoma metastases: assessment of tumor burden for clinical prediction of outcome in the first multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial (MSLT-I)[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2022, 48(6): 1280-1287.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.01.021 pmid: 35246348 |
[15] |
MONCRIEFF M D, LO S N, SCOLYER R A, et al. Clinical outcomes and risk stratification of early-stage melanoma micrometastases from an international multicenter study: implications for the management of American Joint Committee on Cancer ⅢA disease[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(34): 3940-3951.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02488 |
[16] |
GERSHENWALD J E, SCOLYER R A, HESS K R, et al. Melanoma staging: evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(6): 472-492.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21409 |
[17] | 樊代明, 主编. 中国肿瘤整合诊治指南(CACA)-2022-黑色素瘤[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 2022. |
FAN D M, editor-in-chief. Chinese guidelines for integrated cancer diagnosis and treatment (CACA)-2022-melanoma[M]. Tianjin Science and Technology Press, 2022. | |
[18] | 中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会组织. 中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)黑色素瘤诊疗指南-2021[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021. |
Working Committee on Guidelines of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma-2021[M]. People 's Medical Publishing House, 2021. | |
[19] |
EGGERMONT A M, CHIARION-SILENI V, GROB J J, et al. Prolonged survival in stage Ⅲ melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(19): 1845-1855.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611299 |
[20] |
ASCIERTO P A, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage ⅢB-C and stage Ⅳ melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(11): 1465-1477.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30494-0 |
[21] |
EGGERMONT A M M, BLANK C U, MANDALÀ M, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage Ⅲ melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(5): 643-654.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00065-6 |
[22] |
DUMMER R, BRASE J C, GARRETT J, et al. Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib versus placebo in patients with resected, BRAFV600-mutant, stage Ⅲ melanoma (COMBI-AD): exploratory biomarker analyses from a randomised, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(3): 358-372.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30062-0 |
[23] |
DUMMER R, HAUSCHILD A, SANTINAMI M, et al. Five-year analysis of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage Ⅲ melanoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(12): 1139-1148.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005493 |
[24] |
KIRKWOOD J M, MANOLA J, IBRAHIM J, et al. A pooled analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and intergroup trials of adjuvant high-dose interferon for melanoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10(5): 1670-1677.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1103-3 pmid: 15014018 |
[25] |
IVES N J, SUCIU S, EGGERMONT A M M, et al. Adjuvant interferon-α for the treatment of high-risk melanoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2017, 82: 171-183.
doi: S0959-8049(17)31032-8 pmid: 28692949 |
[26] |
PEHAMBERGER H, SOYER H P, STEINER A, et al. Adjuvant interferon alfa-2a treatment in resected primary stage Ⅱ cutaneous melanoma. Austrian Malignant Melanoma Cooperative Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16(4): 1425-1429.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1425 |
[27] |
KIRKWOOD J M, IBRAHIM J G, SONDAK V K, et al. High- and low-dose interferon Alfa-2b in high-risk melanoma: first analysis of intergroup trial E1690/S9111/C9190[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2000, 18(12): 2444-2458.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.12.2444 pmid: 10856105 |
[28] |
LI T, JIA D D, TENG L S. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus high-dose interferon α-2b for Chinese patients with resected stage Ⅲ melanoma: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Invest New Drugs, 2020, 38(5): 1334-1341.
doi: 10.1007/s10637-020-00913-6 |
[29] | JIA D D, NIU Y L, ZHU H L, et al. Prior therapy with pegylated-interferon Alfa-2b improves the efficacy of adjuvant pembrolizumab in resectable advanced melanoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 675873. |
[30] |
LIAN B, SI L, CHI Z H, et al. Toripalimab (anti-PD-1) versus high-dose interferon-α2b as adjuvant therapy in resected mucosal melanoma: a phase Ⅱ randomized trial[J]. Ann Oncol, 2022, 33(10): 1061-1070.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.002 |
[31] |
TRIMBLE E L, UNGERLEIDER R S, ABRAMS J A, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy in cancer treatment[J]. Cancer, 1993, 72(11 Suppl): 3515-3524.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19931201)72:11+<3515::aid-cncr2820721619>3.0.co;2-a pmid: 8242583 |
[32] |
BUZAID A C, COLOME M, BEDIKIAN A, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of neoadjuvant concurrent biochemotherapy in melanoma patients with local-regional metastases[J]. Melanoma Res, 1998, 8(6): 549-556.
doi: 10.1097/00008390-199812000-00010 |
[33] |
LEWIS K D, ROBINSON W A, MCCARTER M, et al. Phase Ⅱ multicenter study of neoadjuvant biochemotherapy for patients with stage Ⅲ malignant melanoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(19): 3157-3163.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5344 |
[34] |
MOSCHOS S J, EDINGTON H D, LAND S R, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment of regional stage ⅢB melanoma with high-dose interferon alfa-2b induces objective tumor regression in association with modulation of tumor infiltrating host cellular immune responses[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(19): 3164-3171.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2498 |
[35] |
BLANK C U, ROZEMAN E A, FANCHI L F, et al. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage Ⅲ melanoma[J]. Nat Med, 2018, 24(11): 1655-1661.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0198-0 |
[36] |
ROZEMAN E A, MENZIES A M, VAN AKKOOI A C J, et al. Identification of the optimal combination dosing schedule of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage Ⅲ melanoma (OpACIN-neo): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised, controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(7): 948-960.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30151-2 |
[37] |
REIJERS I L M, MENZIES A M, VAN AKKOOI A C J, et al. Personalized response-directed surgery and adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in high-risk stage Ⅲ melanoma: the PRADO trial[J]. Nat Med, 2022, 28(6): 1178-1188.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01851-x |
[38] |
AMARIA R N, REDDY S M, TAWBI H A, et al. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma[J]. Nat Med, 2018, 24(11): 1649-1654.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1 pmid: 30297909 |
[39] |
AMARIA R N, POSTOW M, BURTON E M, et al. Neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab in resectable melanoma[J]. Nature, 2022, 611(7934): 155-160.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05368-8 |
[40] |
WANG X, CUI C L, SI L, et al. A phase Ⅰb clinical trial of neoadjuvant OrienX010, an oncolytic virus, in combination with toripalimab in patients with resectable stage Ⅲb to stage ⅣM1a acral melanoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(15_suppl): 9570.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9570 |
[41] | CUI C L, et al. 796P Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus axitinib in patients (pts) with resectable mucosal melanoma (MuM): updated findings of a single-arm, phase Ⅱ trial[J]. Ann Oncol, 2022, 33: S908. |
[42] |
AMARIA R N, PRIETO P A, TETZLAFF M T, et al. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma: a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(2): 181-193.
doi: S1470-2045(18)30015-9 pmid: 29361468 |
[43] |
LONG G V, SAW R P M, LO S, et al. Neoadjuvant dabrafenib combined with trametinib for resectable, stageⅢB-C, BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma (NeoCombi): a single-arm, open-label, single-centre, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(7): 961-971.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30331-6 |
[44] |
AMARIA R N, et al. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in melanoma: recommendations of the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(7): e378-e389.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30332-8 |
[45] |
MUELLER K L, THEORET M R, LEMERY S J, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for melanoma: a US Food and Drug Administration-melanoma research alliance public workshop[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2021, 27(2): 394-401.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3285 pmid: 33188142 |
[1] | 伍雯, 张若昕, 翁俊勇, 马延磊, 蔡国响, 李心翔, 杨永志. 探索阳性淋巴结比率在ypⅢ期结直肠癌患者中的预后价值及预测模型的建立[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(9): 873-880. |
[2] | 刘帅, 张凯, 张晓青, 栾巍. 派安普利单抗联合安罗替尼和化疗围手术期治疗局部进展期胃癌的探索性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(7): 659-668. |
[3] | 李晓辉, 赵加旭, 彭海豹, 张叶, 曾睿, 迟喻丹. HMGA2对软脑膜转移黑色素瘤细胞迁移和增殖的影响[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(4): 389-399. |
[4] | 许永虎, 徐大志. 21世纪以来胃癌治疗进展及未来展望[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(3): 239-249. |
[5] | 薛驰, 高鹏, 朱志, 王振宁. 免疫治疗在胃癌的围手术期及转化治疗中的应用和挑战[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2024, 34(3): 259-267. |
[6] | 王若曦, 吉芃, 龚悦, 陈盛. HER2低表达乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果及其预后特征:一项单中心回顾性研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(7): 686-692. |
[7] | 杨梓怡, 李盼丽, 顾丙新, 刘成, 宋少莉, 许晓平. 68Ga-DOTA-PDL1P的设计合成及其在黑色素瘤小鼠模型中的应用研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(4): 354-360. |
[8] | 毕钊, 陈鹏, 邱鹏飞, 陈玉光, 王永胜. 乳腺癌新辅助治疗后腋窝淋巴结转移情况分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(4): 361-367. |
[9] | 樊庆达, 丛斌斌, 陈玉光, 段宝伟, 王永胜. 临床淋巴结阳性新辅助治疗后腋窝降阶处理的研究进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(2): 174-180. |
[10] | 中国抗癌协会男性生殖系统肿瘤专业委员会. 高危前列腺癌围手术期综合治疗专家共识(2023年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(12): 1204-1214. |
[11] | 赵博伦, 朱冠男. NRAS突变型晚期黑色素瘤的治疗进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(10): 936-944. |
[12] | 邹淳缘, 许晓峰, 卢仁泉, 郭林. 肺癌组织和外周血中p53、PGP9.5、SOX2、GAGE7、GBU4-5和MAGE A1蛋白水平检测及其临床价值探讨[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(1): 36-44. |
[13] | 陈安莉, 沈浩元, 阳仕雄, 邓春燕, 胡超华, 刘汉忠, 王舒, 钱芳. 血浆长链非编码RNA H19对乳腺癌新辅助治疗效果的预测价值[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(8): 727-735. |
[14] | 蔡钢, 王舒蓓, 陈佳艺. 放射治疗在胃癌全程管理中的现状与挑战[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(7): 581-587. |
[15] | 刘建兰, 陈黛诗, 胡泓, 周冬仙, 胡锦涛. HER2阳性浸润性乳腺癌新辅助治疗反应的预测因子及治疗前后HER2状态变化的评估[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(5): 417-426. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
地址:上海市徐汇区东安路270号复旦大学附属肿瘤医院10号楼415室
邮编:200032 电话:021-64188274 E-mail:zgazzz@china-oncology.com
访问总数:; 今日访问总数:; 当前在线人数:
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn