中国癌症杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1017-1025.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2020.12.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

探索淋巴结外侵犯对胃癌患者生存预后的影响(附2 386例报告)

丁平安,杨沛刚,田 园,郭子阳,郭洪海,刘 洋,张志栋,王 冬,李 勇,赵 群   

  1. 河北医科大学第四医院外三科,河北 石家庄 050011
  • 出版日期:2020-12-30 发布日期:2021-01-08
  • 通信作者: 赵 群 E-mail: zhaoqun@hebmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    河北卫健委县级公立医院适宜卫生技术推广入库项目(2019024);政府资助临床医学优秀人才培养项目(2019012);河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(ZD2019139)。

Effect of extranodal invasion on survival and prognosis of gastric cancer patients: a report of 2 386 cases

DING Pingan, YANG Peigang, TIAN Yuan, GUO Ziyang, GUO Honghai, LIU Yang, ZHANG Zhidong, WANG Dong, LI Yong, ZHAO Qun   

  1. The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
  • Published:2020-12-30 Online:2021-01-08
  • Contact: ZHAO Qun E-mail: zhaoqun@hebmu.edu.cn

摘要: 背景与目的:在第8版胃癌TNM分期中,淋巴结外侵犯被列为独立疾病登记变量之一,其阳性患者具有更高的疾病相关病死率和复发率,与不良预后密切相关。探讨淋巴结外侵犯(extracapsular lymph node involvement,EC-LNI)与胃癌临床病理学特征之间的关系,分析其对胃癌患者生存预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析河北医科大学第四医院外三科自2012年1月1日—2015年1月1日行根治性手术治疗的2 386例胃癌患者,分析EC-LNI与临床病理学特征的关系及其对胃癌患者生存预后的影响。结果:2 386例胃癌患者中EC-LNI(+)333例(13.96%),EC-LNI(-)2 053例(86.04%)。单因素分析结果显示,肿瘤直径、组织学类型、Borrmann分型、浸润深度pT分期、肿瘤pTNM分期、Lauren分型、脉管瘤栓、神经受侵、Ki-67增殖指数、血清肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)、糖类抗原(carbohydrate,CA)19-9及CA72-4表达情况均与EC-LNI状态有关(均P<0.05);多因素分析结果显示,肿瘤直径大小(P=0.010)、组织学类型(P=0.016)、肿瘤浸润深度pT分期(P=0.011)、肿瘤pTNM分期(P=0.003)、Borrmann分型(P=0.032)、脉管瘤栓浸润(P=0.022)均是发生EC-LNI的独立危险因素。2 386例胃癌患者中共有2 273例(95.26%)获得完整随访资料,全组患者5年总生存率(overall survival,OS)为49.32%,5年无病生存率(disease-free survival,DFS)为44.61%。其中EC-LNI(+)者5年OS为27.86%,5年DFS为25.39%,而EC-LNI(-)者5年OS、DFS分别为52.87%、47.79%,两组患者的5年OS、DFS差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。单因素分析显示,EC-LNI数目(P=0.001)与胃癌患者预后有关,同时年龄、病灶部位、肿瘤直径、组织学类型、Borrmann分型、肿瘤浸润深度pT分期、淋巴结转移pN分期、肿瘤pTNM分期、Lauren分型、脉管瘤栓有无、Ki-67阳性比例、术后是否化疗也均与预后相关(均P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,肿瘤组织学类型(P=0.013)、浸润深度pT分期(P=0.020)、淋巴结转移pN分期(P=0.019)、肿瘤pTNM分期(P=0.001)、脉管瘤栓有无(P=0.031)和EC-LNI数目(P=0.001)是影响患者预后的独立危险因素,而术后辅助化疗(P=0.003)是患者预后的保护性因素。结论:EC-LNI与胃癌患者的肿瘤分期及预后密切相关,有无EC-LNI和EC-LNI数目均是影响胃癌患者预后的危险因素。

关键词: 胃肿瘤, 淋巴结外侵犯, 预后, 危险因素

Abstract: Background and purpose: In the 8th edition of the TNM staging of gastric cancer, extranodal invasion is listed as one of the independent disease registration variables. The positive patients have a higher disease-related mortality and recurrence rate, which is closely related to the poor prognosis. This study explored the relationship between extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) and clinicopathological features of gastric cancer, and analyzed its impact on the survival prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Methods: A retrospective study of 2 386 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical surgery from Jan. 1, 2012 to Jan. 1, 2015 in the Department of External Medicine of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University was analyzed. The relationship between EC-LNI and clinicopathological characteristics and its effect on the survival of gastric cancer patients were analyzed. Results: Among the 2 386 gastric cancer patients, 333 (13.96%) were EC-LNI (+), and 2 053 (86.04%) were EC-LNI (-). Univariate analysis showed that tumor diameter, histological type, Borrmann classification, depth of invasion pT stage, tumor pTNM stage, Lauren classification, vascular tumor thrombus, nerve invasion, Ki-67 positive ratio and the expressions of serum tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate (CA)19 -9 and CA72-4] were related to the status of EC-LNI (both P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that the tumor diameter (P=0.010), histological type (P=0.016), tumor infiltration depth pT staging (P=0.011), tumor pTNM staging (P=0.003), Borrmann type (P=0.032) and vascular tumor thrombus (P=0.022) were all independent risk factors for EC-LNI. Complete follow-up data were received from 2 273 (95.26%) of the 2 386 gastric cancer patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of the group was 49.32%, and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 44.61%. Among them, the EC-LNI (+) 5-year OS rate was 27.86%, the 5-year DFS rate was 25.39%, and the EC-LNI (-) 5-year OS and DFS rates were 52.87% and 47.79%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the 5-year OS rates and DFS rates between the two groups of patients (both P<0.001). Univariate analysis showed that the number of EC-LNI (P=0.000) was related to the prognosis of gastric cancer patients, and mean age, lesion location, tumor diameter, histological type, Borrmann classification, tumor invasion depth pT stage, lymph node metastasis pN stage, tumor pTNM stage, Lauren classification, presence or absence of vascular tumor thrombus, positive rate of Ki-67 and postoperative chemotherapy were also related to prognosis (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor histology type (P=0.013), depth of invasion pT stage (P=0.020), lymph node metastasis pN stage (P=0.019), tumor pTNM stage (P=0.001), presence or absence of vascular tumor thrombus (P=0.031) and the number of EC-LNI (P=0.001) were independent risk factors that affected the prognosis of patients, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.003) was a protective factor for patient’s prognosis. Conclusion: EC-LNI is closely related to the tumor stage and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. The presence or absence of EC-LNI and the number of EC-LNI are risk factors that affect the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

Key words: Gastric cancer, Extracapsular lymph node involvement, Prognosis, Risk factors