中国癌症杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 569-574.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2017.07.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

长链非编码RNA PANDAR在非小细胞肺癌中的表达和临床意义

聂 军,周 波,张郁林   

  1. 三峡大学人民医院心胸外科,湖北 宜昌 443000
  • 出版日期:2017-07-30 发布日期:2017-08-16
  • 通信作者: 聂 军 E-mail:niejun197908@163.com

The expression and clinical significance of PANDAR in non-small cell lung cancer

NIE Jun, ZHOU Bo, ZHANG Yulin   

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, People’s Hospital of Sanxia University, Yichang 443000, Hubei Province, China
  • Published:2017-07-30 Online:2017-08-16
  • Contact: NIE Jun E-mail: niejun197908@163.com

摘要: 背景与目的:长链非编码RNA(long non-coding RNA,lncRNA)在肿瘤的发生、发展过程中有重要作用。LncRNA CDKN1A反义链启动子DNA损伤激动RNA(promoter of CDKN1A antisense DNA damage activated RNA,PANDAR)与多种肿瘤的进展及预后相关。探讨非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)组织中lncRNA PANDAR的表达及临床意义。方法:采用实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction,RTFQ-PCR)方法检测94例新鲜NSCLC组织标本及相对应的癌旁组织标本中PANDAR的表达,分析其与NSCLC的临床病理特征、诊断价值和预后的关系。结果:PANDAR在NSCLC组织中的表达显著低于癌旁组织(P<0.001);PANDAR低表达和高表达组在肿瘤体积、淋巴结转移、疾病分期和分化程度方面差异均有统计学意义(χ2=9.197,P=0.002;χ2=7.126,P=0.008;χ2=6.271,P=0.012;χ2=8.147,P=0.004);受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.797(95%CI:0.614~0.849;P<0.001),灵敏度和特异度分别是49.8%和84.3%,Youden指数为0.402;PANDAR低表达和高表达组在总生存期(overall survival,OS)及无进展生存期(progression free survival,PFS)上的差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.282,P=0.007;χ2=6.777,P=0.009)。结论:PANDAR在NSCLC中低表达,可以作为NSCLC的新型生物标志物和诊断靶标。

关键词: CDKN1A反义链启动子DNA损伤激动RNA, 非小细胞肺癌, 受试者工作特征曲线, 临床病理特征, 生物标志物

Abstract: Background and purpose: Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is associated with carcinogenesis and cancer development. LncRNA promoter of CDKN1A antisense DNA damage activated RNA (PANDAR) was correlated with the progression and prognosis of various cancers. This study aimed to investigate the expression and clinical significance of PANDAR in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTFQ-PCR) was used to detect PANDAR expression in 94 cases of NSCLC tissues and adjacent tissues. The association with patient clinic-pathological characteristics, diagnostic value and prognosis of PANDAR were further analyzed. Results: PANDAR expression was significantly downregulated in the NSCLC compared with adjacent tissues (P<0.001). There was significant differences between tumor size, lymphatic metastasis, TNM stage and histologic differentiation in terms of PANDAR expression (χ2=9.197, P=0.002 4; χ2=7.126, P=0.008; χ2=6.271, P=0.012; χ2=8.147, P=0.004). The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.797 (95%CI: 0.614-0.849; P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity were 49.8% and 84.3%, respectively. The index of Youden was 0.402. The differences between PANDAR low expression and high expression groups were statistically significant in overall survival time and progression free survival (χ2=7.282, P=0.007; χ2=6.777, P=0.009). Conclusion: The expression of PANDAR is down-regulated in patients with NSCLC and might prove useful as a biomarker for diagnosis and prognostic significance.

Key words: Promoter of CDKN1A antisense DNA damage activated RNA, Non-small cell lung cancer, Receiver operating characteristic curve, Clinical pathological, Biomarker