China Oncology ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 394-400.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.05.012

Previous Articles    

Clinical study on treating cancer-related nausea, vomiting and fatigue using metoclopramide plus haloperidol

LI Ling1, MA Guixia2, SI Zhuangli1, WANG Peng3, YUAN Huili1, GAO Tianhui4, MA Wang5, WANG Wei1   

  1. 1. Department of Palliative Care and Hospice Care, the Ninth People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou 450053, Henan Province, China; 2. Department of Gynecology, the First People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China; 3. Nursing College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China; 4. Medical Oncology, Henan Province People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan Province, China; 5. The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China
  • Online:2018-05-30 Published:2018-06-12
  • Contact: LI Ling E-mail: lilingmdzz@126.com

Abstract: Background and purpose: Cancer-related nausea, vomiting and fatigue can cause severe damage to body functions and develop multiple complications in patients with advanced cancer, which can seriously affect the quality of life and even lead to death. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metoclopramide combined with haloperidol in treating advanced cancer-related nausea and vomiting (CRNV) and determine whether it affected fatigue. Methods: A total of 536 advanced cancer patients with nausea and vomiting were included and randomly assigned to the ondansetron group (n=133), the metoclopramide group (n=135), the haloperidol group (n=132) and the metoclopramide plus haloperidol group (n=136). Outcome parameters were measured at 48 h, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after receiving antiemetic using the Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (INVR), and the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF). Results: The efficacy rates of metoclopramide plus haloperidol groups were 53.7%, 86.8% and 94.9%, respectively. The INVR of using ondansetron 48 h was significantly lower than that of single and combined metoclopramide plus haloperidol regimens. However, 2 and 4 weeks after receiving metoclopramide plus haloperidol regimens, the INVR and MFSI-SF scores of metoclopramide plus haloperidol regimens significantly declined compared with the control and single antiemetic (P<0.05). Conclusion: Metoclopramide plus haloperidol can prevent and treat advanced cancer-related nausea and vomiting with significant clinical efficacy, and is helpful in alleviating fatigue. It is well worth spreading for clinical use.

Key words: Metoclopramide, Haloperidol, Advanced cancer patients, Cancer-related nausea and vomiting, Cancer-related fatigue