中国癌症杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 561-567.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2019.08.001

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国早期乳腺癌术后辅助治疗开展现状——一项基于110家医院的横断面调查研究

张 琪,郭  瑢 ,李  伦,修秉虬,杨 犇 龙,王  嘉,季玮儒,邵志敏,吴  炅   

  1. 复旦大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海 200032
  • 出版日期:2019-08-30 发布日期:2019-09-29
  • 通信作者: 吴 炅 E-mail: wujiong1122@vip.sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1311004)。

Current status of adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in China: a cross-sectional study based on 110 hospitals

ZHANG Qi, GUO Rong, LI Lun, XIU Bingqiu, YANG Benlong, WANG Jia, JI Weiru, SHAO Zhimin, WU Jiong   

  1. Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Published:2019-08-30 Online:2019-09-29
  • Contact: WU Jiong E-mail: wujiong1122@vip.sina.com

摘要: 背景与目的:乳腺癌术后辅助治疗是乳腺癌综合治疗的重要组成部分之一。对中国乳腺癌诊疗现状进行基线调查,掌握早期乳腺癌术后辅助治疗的开展情况。方法:选取全国范围内110家乳腺癌年手术量超过200例的医疗机构,以问卷调查形式开展研究,调查内容包括手术医师及其所在科室和医院的基本情况、2017年乳腺癌手术开展情况,以及对乳腺癌术后辅助治疗相关热点问题的具体决策。结果:80.9%的受访医院使用常规病理学指标作为预后评价工具,多基因检测工具的使用比例不到20%。对于T 1a 期患者,48.2%的医院对人表皮生长因子受体2(human epidermal growth factor receptor 2,HER2)阳性型患者采用靶向治疗,77.3%的医院对三阴性乳腺癌(triple-negative breast cancer,TNBC)采用辅助化疗,蒽环类药物序贯紫杉类药物方案是最常用的化疗方案。对于高复发风险的患者,70.9%的受访医院主张密集化疗,但大部分医院的实际实施比例不到20%。对于激素受体阳性的患者,主张延长内分泌治疗时长至10年的医院占一半以上。绝经后患者联合应用双膦酸盐的比例在40%以内,绝经前患者使用卵巢功能抑制(ovarian function suppression,OFS)的比例总体也在40%以下,芳香化酶抑制剂(aromatase inhibitor,AI)是OFS的公认联合药物。结论:目前国内医院使用多基因预后预测工具的比例较低,对早期乳腺癌患者的辅助治疗决策较为保守,密集化疗、OFS和双膦酸盐等治疗方法和药物的应用比例较低。蒽环序贯紫杉方案和AI的临床应用已形成共识,延长内分泌治疗时长也成为新的趋势。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 辅助化疗, 内分泌治疗, 问卷调查

Abstract: Background and purpose: Adjuvant therapy is one of the important components of comprehensive treatment for breast cancer. This research aimed to investigate the current status of breast cancer treatment and master the development of postoperative adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in China. Methods: A total of 110 medical institutions nationwide with more than 200 cases of breast cancer surgery yearly were selected into a questionnaire survey. The survey included basic information of the surgeons and their hospitals, information of breast cancer surgery in 2017 and decision-making on hot topics related to postoperative adjuvant therapy. Results: In this study, 80.9% of the hospitals surveyed used clinicopathological biomarkers as a prognostic evaluation tool, and the proportion of multi-gene detection tools was less than 20%. For patients with T 1a stage disease, 48.2% of hospitals used targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subtype, and 77.3% advocated chemotherapy for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The anthracycline followed by taxane regimen was most commonly used in chemotherapy. For patients with high risk of recurrence, 70.9% hospitals advocated dose-dense chemotherapy, but the actual implementation rates of most hospitals were less than 20%. For hormone receptor-positive patients, more than half of the hospitals recommended endocrine therapy for 10 years. The proportion of postmenopausal patients using bisphosphonate was less than 40%, and the proportion of premenopausal patients using ovarian function suppression (OFS) was also below 40%. Aromatase inhibitor (AI) was a recognized combination of OFS. Conclusion: At present, the proportion of multi-gene prognostic tools used in domestic hospitals is relatively low, and the decision-making of adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer patients is conservative. The application rates of dose-dense chemotherapy, OFS and bisphosphonate are at a low level. The clinical application of the anthracycline followed by taxane regimen and AI has formed a consensus, and prolonging the duration of endocrine therapy has also become a new trend.

Key words: Breast cancer, Adjuvant chemotherapy, Endocrine therapy, Questionnaire survey