China Oncology ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 45-51.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2019.01.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the prognostic classifications between the 7th and 8th editions of AJCC cancer staging manual for breast cancer

ZHANG Fengchun1,2, ZUO Li3, MA Yue4, LIU Zhaonan4, YAN Ningning1,2, XU Haiyan1, XU Yingchun4   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu Province, China; 2. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China; 3. Department of Oncology, Minhang Branch of Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China; 4. Department of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Online:2019-01-30 Published:2019-02-01
  • Contact: ZUO Li E-mail: zuohuang2005@163.com

Abstract: Background and purpose: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition cancer staging manual introduced a new prognostic staging system for breast cancer incorporating biological markers in addition to traditional anatomical factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical value of the 8th edition AJCC classification for breast cancer. Methods: The data from 222 recurrent or metastatic cases of breast cancer after operation were analyzed. Cancer staging was determined using the 7th edition anatomical staging criteria including tumor (T), node (N) and metastasis (M), and was further evaluated using 8th edition prognostic classification. We compared the two staging systems and their relations to prognosis. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for univariate comparison of disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The percentages of ⅠA, ⅠB, ⅡA, ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB and ⅢC were 34 (15.3%), 0 (0.0%), 73 (32.9%), 26 (11.7%), 45 (20.3%), 4 (1.8%) and 40 (18.0%) according to AJCC 7th edition anatomical TNM staging system, respectively. The percentages of ⅠA, ⅠB, ⅡA, ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB and ⅢC were 47 (21.2%), 35 (15.8%), 55 (24.8%), 17 (7.7%), 25 (11.3%), 30 (13.5%) and 13 (5.9%) according to AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging system, respectively. The difference between the two staging groups was significant (P=0.000). Changes occurred mainly in the following categories: the 7th edition ⅠA was divided into the 8th edition ⅠA and ⅠB categories; ⅡA was divided into ⅠA, ⅠB and ⅡA; ⅡB was divided into ⅠA, ⅠB, ⅡA, ⅡB and ⅢA; ⅢA was divided into ⅠB, ⅡA, ⅡB, ⅢA, ⅢB and ⅢC; and both the 7th edition ⅢB and ⅢC were divided into the 8th edition ⅢA, ⅢB and ⅢC categories. There was statistically significant difference in DFS between stage groups according to both AJCC 7th edition TNM and 8th edition prognostic staging systems (P=0.002 and 0.001), and the DFS in ⅢB and ⅢC groups according to AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging system was more accurate compared with AJCC 7th edition. Conclusion: The 8th edition AJCC prognostic classification could exactly predict the prognosis of breast cancer.

Key words: Breast carcinoma, Staging system, Prognosis