China Oncology ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 719-726.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.08.007
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
XIAO Jialong1()(), MO Miao1, ZHOU Changming1, WANG Zezhou1, SHEN Jie1, YUAN Jing1, YU Keda2, LIU Guangyu2, WU Jiong2, SHEN Zhenzhou2, SHAO Zhimin2, ZHENG Ying1()()
Received:
2022-05-05
Revised:
2022-07-19
Online:
2022-08-30
Published:
2022-09-19
Contact:
ZHENG Ying
E-mail:19211230035@fudan.edu.cn;zhengying@fudan.edu.cn
CLC Number:
XIAO Jialong, MO Miao, ZHOU Changming, WANG Zezhou, SHEN Jie, YUAN Jing, YU Keda, LIU Guangyu, WU Jiong, SHEN Zhenzhou, SHAO Zhimin, ZHENG Ying. The effect of the interaction between body mass index and age on the prognosis of breast cancer[J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(8): 719-726.
Tab. 1
Distribution of clinicopathological features of patients with breast cancer between the different BMI groups"
Item | BMI (kg/m2) | χ2 | P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<18.5 | 18.5≤BMI<24.0 | 24≤BMI<28.0 | ≥28.0 | |||
Age/year | 981.443 | <0.001 | ||||
<35 | 187 (18.44%) | 1 112 (7.70%) | 222 (3.05%) | 50 (2.79%) | ||
35-59 | 637 (62.82%) | 10 575 (73.24%) | 4 800 (65.99%) | 1 046 (58.37%) | ||
≥60 | 190 (18.74%) | 2 751 (19.05%) | 2 252 (30.96%) | 696 (38.84%) | ||
Menopause | 715.483 | <0.001 | ||||
No | 585 (57.69%) | 7 690 (53.26%) | 2 766 (38.03%) | 538 (30.02%) | ||
Yes | 429 (42.31%) | 6 748 (46.74%) | 4 508 (61.97%) | 1 254 (69.98%) | ||
Side* | 7.092 | 0.069 | ||||
Right | 464 (46.03%) | 6 889 (48.09%) | 3 392 (46.90%) | 805 (45.38%) | ||
Left | 544 (53.97%) | 7 437 (51.91%) | 3 841 (53.10%) | 969 (54.62%) | ||
Invasive | 19.340 | <0.001 | ||||
In situ | 92 (9.07%) | 1 215 (8.42%) | 528 (7.26%) | 109 (6.08%) | ||
Invasive | 922 (90.93%) | 13 223 (91.58%) | 6 746 (92.74%) | 1 683 (93.92%) | ||
Multi# | 0.788 | 0.852 | ||||
No | 971 (95.76%) | 13 865 (96.04%) | 6 980 (95.98%) | 1 727 (96.37%) | ||
Yes | 43 (4.24%) | 572 (3.96%) | 292 (4.02%) | 65 (3.63%) | ||
Ki-67△ | 2.167 | 0.539 | ||||
Low | 289 (35.68%) | 4 552 (37.62%) | 2 327 (38.20%) | 560 (37.38%) | ||
High | 521 (64.32%) | 7 549 (62.38%) | 3 764 (61.80%) | 938 (62.62%) | ||
ER▲ | 8.950 | 0.030 | ||||
Negative | 293 (30.05%) | 3 957 (28.17%) | 1 959 (27.55%) | 448 (25.34%) | ||
Positive | 682 (69.95%) | 10 088 (71.83%) | 5 152 (72.45%) | 1 320 (74.66%) | ||
PR** | 13.627 | 0.003 | ||||
Negative | 388 (39.75%) | 4 956 (35.30%) | 2 480 (34.88%) | 579 (32.82%) | ||
Positive | 588 (60.25%) | 9 082 (64.70%) | 4 630 (65.12%) | 1 185 (67.18%) | ||
HER2## | 15.476 | 0.001 | ||||
Negative | 622 (70.52%) | 9 191 (71.86%) | 4 837 (73.53%) | 1 247 (75.53%) | ||
Positive | 260 (29.48%) | 3 600 (28.14%) | 1 741 (26.47%) | 404 (24.47%) | ||
T△△ | 179.136 | <0.001 | ||||
T0 | 17 (1.99%) | 255 (1.99%) | 189 (2.85%) | 42 (2.58%) | ||
Tis | 92 (10.77%) | 1 215 (9.48%) | 528 (7.96%) | 109 (6.70%) | ||
T1 | 465 (54.45%) | 6 887 (53.72%) | 3 149 (47.47%) | 748 (45.95%) | ||
T2 | 249 (29.16%) | 4 183 (32.63%) | 2 612 (39.37%) | 684 (42.01%) | ||
T3-4 | 31 (3.63%) | 279 (2.18%) | 156 (2.35%) | 45 (2.76%) | ||
N▲▲ | 73.100 | <0.001 | ||||
N0 | 641 (67.19%) | 9 242 (66.29%) | 4 423 (63.01%) | 1 014 (59.68%) | ||
N1 | 210 (22.01%) | 2 895 (20.77%) | 1 510 (21.51%) | 372 (21.90%) | ||
N2 | 61 (6.39%) | 1 120 (8.03%) | 647 (9.22%) | 195 (11.48%) | ||
N3 | 42 (4.40%) | 684 (4.91%) | 439 (6.25%) | 118 (6.95%) | ||
M | 17.461 | 0.001 | ||||
M0 | 992 (97.83%) | 14 256 (98.74%) | 7 165 (98.50%) | 1 750 (97.66%) | ||
M1 | 22 (2.17%) | 182 (1.26%) | 109 (1.50%) | 42 (2.34%) |
Tab. 2
Analysis of the interaction between BMI and age"
Characteristic | HR (95% CI) | P value |
---|---|---|
Age | <0.001 | |
<35 | 1 | |
≥35 and <60 | 0.831 (0.597-1.158) | 0.274 |
≥60 | 1.746 (1.233-2.473) | 0.002 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.002 | |
<18.5 | 1.166 (0.521-2.609) | 0.709 |
≥18.5 and <24 | 1 | |
≥24 and <28 | 1.329 (0.721-2.450) | 0.361 |
≥28 | 4.247 (2.054-8.778) | <0.001 |
BMI (kg/m2) * age | 0.011 | |
BMI (≥18.5 and <24)*age (<35) | 1 | |
BMI (<18.5)*age (≥35 and <60) | 0.842 (0.367-1.932) | 0.686 |
BMI (≥24 and <28)*age (≥35 and <60) | 0.704 (0.277-1.789) | 0.461 |
BMI (≥28)*age (≥35 and <60) | 0.299 (0.106-0.842) | 0.022 |
BMI (<18.5)*age (≥60) | 0.777 (0.314-1.923) | 0.586 |
BMI (≥24 and <28)*age (≥60) | 0.524 (0.193-1.424) | 0.205 |
BMI (≥28)*age (≥60) | 0.193 (0.064-0.580) | 0.003 |
Tab. 3
Hazard ratios of mortality of breast cancer patients for different value of BMI compared to the median BMI grouped by age"
BMI implication | BMI value (kg/m2) | Age<35 | 35≤age<60 | Age≥60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI)* | HR (95% CI)# | HR (95% CI)* | HR (95% CI)# | HR (95% CI)* | HR (95% CI)# | ||
1st percentile | 17.19 | 1.258 (0.674-2.347) | 2.016 (1.059-3.836) | 0.921 (0.652-1.301) | 1.005 (0.826-1.222) | 1.482 (0.976-2.250) | 1.497 (1.003-2.236) |
Cut-off of underweight and normal | 18.50 | 0.825 (0.500-1.362) | 1.322 (0.996-1.755) | 0.924 (0.737-1.157) | 1.008 (0.727-1.398) | 1.333 (0.993-1.788) | 1.347 (1.013-1.791) |
Cut-off of normal and overweight | 24.00 | 1.181 (1.082-1.289) | 1.893 (1.095-3.274) | 1.054 (0.984-1.129) | 1.150 (0.694-1.906) | 0.990 (0.914-1.072) | 1.000 (0.989-1.012) |
Cut-off of overweight and obesity | 28.00 | 1.816 (1.145-2.881) | 2.911 (1.669-5.076) | 1.334 (1.142-1.559) | 1.456 (0.880-2.409) | 1.145 (0.921-1.422) | 1.157 (0.975-1.372) |
99th percentile | 31.25 | 2.493 (1.056-5.884) | 3.996 (1.836-8.695) | 1.634 (1.192-2.240) | 1.783 (0.980-3.243) | 1.405 (1.001-1.974) | 1.420 (0.999-2.019) |
[1] |
BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 |
[2] | ROCK C L, DOYLE C, DEMARK-WAHNEFRIED W, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2012, 62(4): 243-274. |
[3] |
PROTANI M, COORY M, MARTIN J H. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010, 123(3): 627-635.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0990-0 |
[4] |
CHAN D S M, VIEIRA A R, AUNE D, et al. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies[J]. Ann Oncol, 2014, 25(10): 1901-1914.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu042 |
[5] |
ZHANG M L, CAI H, BAO P P, et al. Body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and late outcomes: a report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 6996.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07320-7 |
[6] |
CHLEBOWSKI R T, AIELLO E, MCTIERNAN A. Weight loss in breast cancer patient management[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(4): 1128-1143.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.4.1128 |
[7] |
RYU S Y, KIM C B, NAM C M, et al. Is body mass index the prognostic factor in breast cancer? A meta-analysis[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2001, 16(5): 610-614.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2001.16.5.610 |
[8] |
MOON H G, HAN W, NOH D Y. Underweight and breast cancer recurrence and death: a report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(35): 5899-5905.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4436 |
[9] |
CHOLLET-HINTON L, OLSHAN A F, NICHOLS H B, et al. Biology and etiology of young-onset breast cancers among premenopausal African American women: results from the AMBER consortium[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2017, 26(12): 1722-1729.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0450 |
[10] | 赵翠翠, 刘红. 年轻乳腺癌的分子生物学发病机制[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(3): 213-217. |
ZHAO C C, LIU H. Molecular biological pathogenesis of young breast cancer[J]. Cancer Res Prev Treat, 2020, 47(3): 213-217. | |
[11] |
AZIM H A Jr, NGUYEN B, BROHÉE S, et al. Genomic aberrations in young and elderly breast cancer patients[J]. BMC Med, 2015, 13: 266.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0504-3 |
[12] | 周昌明, 莫淼, 袁晶, 等. 以医院登记为基础的20万例恶性肿瘤患者生存报告[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2020, 30(1): 11-24. |
ZHOU C M, MO M, YUAN J, et al. Report on 200 thousand cancer patients' survival from a hospital-based cancer registry database[J]. China Oncol, 2020, 30(1): 11-24. | |
[13] | 中国年轻乳腺癌诊疗与生育管理专家共识专家委员会. 年轻乳腺癌诊疗与生育管理专家共识[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2019, 41(7): 486-495. |
Expert Committee of Consensus on Diagnosis and Treatment of Young Breast Cancer and Fertility Management in China. Chinese consensus guideline for breast cancer in young women: clinical practice and fertility preservation[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2019, 41(7): 486-495. | |
[14] | ORGANIZATION W H. World Health Day 2012: ageing and health: toolkit for event organizers[J]. World Health Organization, 2012. |
[15] | 陈春明, 孔灵芝, 主编. 中华人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司编著. 中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006. |
CHEN C M, KONG L Z, editor-in-chief. Edited by the Department of Disease Control of the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China guidelines for the prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults[M]. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2006. | |
[16] | EDGE S B, BYRD D R, COMPTON C C, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual[M]. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2010. |
[17] |
KAWAI M, MINAMI Y, NISHINO Y, et al. Body mass index and survival after breast cancer diagnosis in Japanese women[J]. BMC Cancer, 2012, 12: 149.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-149 |
[18] |
DE VISSER K E, EICHTEN A, COUSSENS L M. Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2006, 6(1): 24-37.
doi: 10.1038/nrc1782 |
[19] |
MUELLER M M, FUSENIG N E. Friends or foes-bipolar effects of the tumour stroma in cancer[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2004, 4(11): 839-849.
doi: 10.1038/nrc1477 |
[20] |
DENARDO D G, JOHANSSON M, COUSSENS L M. Immune cells as mediators of solid tumor metastasis[J]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2008, 27(1): 11-18.
doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9100-0 |
[21] |
CUNNINGHAM-RUNDLES S, MCNEELEY D F, MOON A. Mechanisms of nutrient modulation of the immune response[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2005, 115(6): 1119-1128; quiz1129.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.04.036 |
[22] |
SCHOLZ C, ANDERGASSEN U, HEPP P, et al. Obesity as an independent risk factor for decreased survival in node-positive high-risk breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 151(3): 569-576.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3422-3 |
[23] |
TANG B, HAN C T, ZHANG G M, et al. Waist-hip ratio (WHR), a better predictor for prostate cancer than body mass index (BMI): results from a Chinese hospital-based biopsy cohort[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 43551.
doi: 10.1038/srep43551 |
[24] | 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(10): 954-1040. |
The Society of Breast Cancer China Anti-Cancer Association. Guidelines for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by China Anti-Cancer Association (2021 edition)[J]. China Oncol, 2021, 31(10): 954-1040. |
[1] | ZHANG Jingchen, LI Xin, LI Jiangtao, LI Haiping, CHEN Yanli, NIU Bing, QI Chuanchuan, YE Beibei. LINC02163 targeting miR-338-3p affects proliferation, invasion and migration of breast cancer cells [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(9): 818-826. |
[2] | Committee of Breast Cancer Society, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Breast Surgeons Committee of Surgeons Branch, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Committee of Breast Cancer Society, Shanghai Anti-Cancer Association. Expert consensus on oncoplastic surgery of breast tumor and breast reconstruction (2022 edition) [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(9): 836-924. |
[3] | XIAO Yuling, ZHU Xiuzhi, JIANG Yizhou, SHAO Zhimin. New research advances and future prospect in precision treatment of triple-negative breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(8): 669-679. |
[4] | QIU Pengfei, WANG Yongsheng. Precise regional management of breast cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: evolution and prospect [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(8): 680-687. |
[5] | ZHANG Yu, LIU Qiang. Advances of liquid biopsy in precision treatment of breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(8): 688-697. |
[6] | ZHOU Wenbin, XIE Hui, DING Qiang, WANG Shui. New research progress of microwave ablation in the local precise treatment of early-stage breast cancer: the prospect of combined immunotherapy is promising [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(8): 698-704. |
[7] | LIU Yiming, FAN Lei, MO Miao, SHAO Zhimin, YU Keda. Factors-associated with short-term effect and long-term survival of ovarian function suppression in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: a retrospective analysis [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(8): 705-711. |
[8] | CHEN Anli, SHEN Haoyuan, YANG Shixiong, DENG Chunyan, HU Chaohua, LIU Hanzhong, WANG Shu, QIAN Fang. Predictive value of plasma long non-coding RNA H19 in neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(8): 727-735. |
[9] | JIANG Jinling, ZHOU Chenfei, XI Wenqi, SHI Min, GEN Mei, ZHAO Liqin, CAI Qu, JIANG Jinsong, ZHANG Jun. Optimization of 5-FU metronomic chemotherapy strategy and regulation of the immune microenvironment in gastric cancer: an in vivo study [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(7): 596-605. |
[10] | LIU Qiang, FANG Yi, WANG Jing. Application progress of single-cell sequencing technology in breast cancer research [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(7): 635-642. |
[11] | QIAN Yao, LIU Feng. Research progress and prospects of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(7): 643-649. |
[12] | JIA Xiaoqing, SUN Xiaoyin, JIANG Beiqi, MEI Zhangyi, FU Yun, ZHUANG Zhigang. Neddylation modification regulates lamin B1 expression in breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(6): 535-541. |
[13] | MA Xiao, XIANG Jiaqing, MA Longfei. Surgical treatment of esophagotracheal fistula caused by neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a case report [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(6): 542-544. |
[14] | LIU Jianlan, CHEN Daishi, HU Hong, ZHOU Dongxian, HU Jintao. Predictors of response to neoadjuvant treatment and changes to HER2 status in HER2-positive invasive breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(5): 417-426. |
[15] | ZHANG Qian, FANG Xiaoyan, LIU Juan, LIU Jin, CHENG Leilei, SUN Jing. Study on the safety of simultaneous integrated boost and the importance of cardiac substructural dose assessment of hypofractionated radiotherapy after early left breast cancer breast-conserving surgery [J]. China Oncology, 2022, 32(5): 427-435. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
沪ICP备12009617
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd