China Oncology ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 922-927.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.12.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and axillary de-escalation management for patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer

SHI Zhiqiang1,2, QIU Pengfei2, CONG Binbin2,3, LIU Yanbing2, BI Zhao2,3, ZHENG Weizhen2,3, DONGYE Yuxi2,3, YANG Ran2,3, WANG Yongsheng2   

  1. 1. Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China; 2. Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250117, Shandong Province, China; 3. School of Medicine and Life Science, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Jinan, Jinan 250200, Shandong Province, China
  • Online:2018-12-30 Published:2019-01-11
  • Contact: WANG Yongsheng E-mail: wangysh2008@aliyun.com

Abstract: Background and purpose: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is regarded as the standard of care in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) disease in early-stage breast cancer, but the timing of SLNB and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in cN0 patients is still controversial. This study aimed to explore the optimal timing of SLNB and NAC, and to assess the feasibility of selective elimination of axillary surgery after NAC in cN0 patients. Methods: From Oct. 2010 to Apr. 2018, 809 patients who underwent surgery after NAC were included in this retrospective study to analyze the correlation between different clinicopathological characteristics of cN0 patients and negative axillary lymph node conversion after NAC (ie, ypN0). Results: Among the 138 cN0 patients receiving NAC, 81.9% (113/138) were ypN0. The rates of ypN0 after NAC in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were 75.4% (15/61), 81.0% (17/21), 79.2% (19/24) and 96.9% (31/32), respectively(P<0.001). The rates of ypN0 after NAC in patients with HER2+ (with targeted therapy) and TNBC were 94.1% (16/17) and 96.9% (31/32), respectively, which were significantly higher than that in HR+/HER2- patients (P<0.05). Molecular subtypes, clinical stage, radiologic complete response and pathologic complete response (bpCR) of the breast tumor correlated with ypN0 after NAC (with full-course chemotherapy, P<0.05). Molecular subtypes (OR=0.454, P=0.049), clinical stage (OR=3.174, P=0.029) and bpCR (OR=0.337, P=0.016) of the breast tumor were independent predictors for ypN0 after NAC. Conclusion: The optimal timing of SLNB and NAC in cN0 patients might be different among different molecular subtypes. It would be preferable to perform SLNB prior to NAC for HR+/HER2- patients, and SLNB after NAC for HER2+ (with targeted therapy) and TNBC patients to reduce the risk of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In view of the high ypN0 rate after NAC in cN0 patients, axillary surgical staging might be selectively eliminated, especially in patients with HER2+ (with targeted therapy) and TNBC.

Key words: Breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Clinically node-negative disease, Sentinel lymph node biopsy