China Oncology ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 581-588.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.06.005
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
REN Hengyu(), HAO Shuang, CHEN Jiajian, YANG Benlong, CAO Ayong, LIU Guangyu, SHAO Zhimin, WU Jiong()
Received:
2023-02-27
Revised:
2023-05-12
Online:
2023-06-30
Published:
2023-07-26
CLC Number:
REN Hengyu, HAO Shuang, CHEN Jiajian, YANG Benlong, CAO Ayong, LIU Guangyu, SHAO Zhimin, WU Jiong. Current status and focus of breast reconstruction research in China and abroad: a bibliometric study[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 581-588.
Tab. 1
Top 10 authors with the most published articles and cited frequency abroad"
Rank | Author with the highest number of publications | Publications | The most cited author | Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lee B T | 56 | Pusic A L | 1 332 |
2 | Pusic A L | 48 | Wilkins E G | 1 121 |
3 | Lin S J | 47 | Hamill J B | 1 040 |
4 | Momeni A | 39 | Qi J | 982 |
5 | Teotia S S | 39 | Kim H M | 896 |
6 | Haddock N T | 38 | Momoh A O | 562 |
7 | Momoh A O | 37 | Lee B T | 540 |
8 | Matros E | 36 | Lin S J | 529 |
9 | Choi M | 36 | Clemens M W | 504 |
10 | Rosson G D | 35 | Matros E | 457 |
Tab. 2
Top 10 institutions by number of publications"
Rank | Institution | Publication n (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | 144 (3.00) |
2 | Harvard Medical School | 139 (2.89) |
3 | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | 125 (2.60) |
4 | Stanford Universitiy | 113 (2.35) |
5 | University of Michigan | 102 (2.12) |
6 | Mayo Clinic | 81 (1.68) |
7 | University of Toronto | 73 (1.52) |
8 | Brigham and Women‘s Hospital | 70 (1.45) |
9 | Maastricht University | 69 (1.43) |
10 | University of Ulsan | 67 (0.96) |
Tab. 4
Top 10 keywords in publications of breast surgery and oncology surgery"
Rank | Keywords | Frequency |
---|---|---|
1 | Breast cancer | 447 |
2 | Breast reconstruction | 242 |
3 | Complication rate | 153 |
4 | Implant | 147 |
5 | Immediate breast reconstruction | 127 |
6 | Quality of life | 122 |
7 | Image | 111 |
8 | Chemotherapy | 96 |
9 | Flap | 83 |
10 | Survival | 82 |
[1] |
SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
doi: 10.3322/caac.v71.3 |
[2] | 郭瑢, 修秉虬, 苏永辉, 等. 中国乳腺癌术后植入物乳房重建现况调查[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(8): 616-621. |
GUO R, XIU B Q, SU Y H, et al. Current practice of implant-based breast reconstruction: results from China national practice questionnaire survey[J]. Chin J Surg, 2019, 57(8): 616-621. | |
[3] |
WANG J, XIU B Q, GUO R, et al. Autologous tissue reconstruction after mastectomy-a cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals in China[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(12): 2202-2207.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.008 pmid: 32807619 |
[4] |
BAKER B G, IRRI R, MACCALLUM V, et al. A prospective comparison of short-term outcomes of subpectoral and prepectoral strattice-based immediate breast reconstruction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(5): 1077-1084.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004270 pmid: 29697602 |
[5] |
O'CONNELL R L, DI MICCO R, KHABRA K, et al. Comparison of immediate versus delayed DIEP flap reconstruction in women who require postmastectomy radiotherapy[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142(3): 594-605.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004676 pmid: 29927832 |
[6] |
GAO Y, GE L, SHI S Z, et al. Global trends and future prospects of e-waste research: a bibliometric analysis[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2019, 26(17): 17809-17820.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05071-8 |
[7] | LIANG C, LUO A, ZHONG Z. Knowledge mapping of medication literacy study: a visualized analysis using CiteSpace[J]. SAGE Open Med, 2018, 6: 2050312118800199. |
[8] |
LIANG Y D, LI Y, ZHAO J, et al. Study of acupuncture for low back pain in recent 20 years: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace[J]. J Pain Res, 2017, 10: 951-964.
doi: 10.2147/JPR |
[9] |
HO A Y, HU Z I, MEHRARA B J, et al. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18(12): e742-e753.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30617-4 pmid: 29208440 |
[10] |
LEE G K, SHECKTER C C. Breast reconstruction following breast cancer treatment-2018[J]. JAMA, 2018, 320(12): 1277-1278.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12190 pmid: 30178060 |
[11] |
SANTOSA K B, QI J, KIM H M, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction[J]. JAMA Surg, 2018, 153(10): 891-899.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677 pmid: 29926096 |
[12] | 叶京明, 辛灵, 王宇, 等. 推动乳腺癌患者乳房重建的专业化和规范化发展[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(2): 88-91. |
YE J M, XIN L, WANG Y, et al. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients: specialization and standardization[J]. Chin J Surg, 2019, 57(2): 88-91. | |
[13] | CHEN Y, CHEN J J, CHEN J Y, et al. Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer patients in China: a survey report[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2014, 36(11): 851-857. |
[14] |
TSANGARIS E, KLASSEN A F, KAUR M N, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the BREAST-Q sensation module for women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(12): 7842-7853.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10094-y pmid: 33988795 |
[15] |
WILKINS E G, HAMILL J B, KIM H M, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: one-year outcomes of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) study[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(1): 164-170.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002033 pmid: 27906762 |
[16] | COOKE A L, DIAZ-ABELE J, HAYAKAWA T, et al. Radiation therapy versus no radiation therapy to the neo-breast following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous free flap reconstruction for breast cancer: patient-reported and surgical outcomes at 1 year-a mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) substudy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2017, 99(1): 165-172. |
[17] |
NELSON J A, CHU J J, MCCARTHY C M, et al. BREAST-Q REACT: clinical reference values for the BREAST-Q in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction patients[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022, 29(8): 5280-5293.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11521-4 pmid: 35415816 |
[18] |
LOHMANDER F, LAGERGREN J, ROY P G, et al. Implant based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: safety data from an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in the setting of breast cancer treatment[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(5): 836-841.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003054 pmid: 30308615 |
[19] |
KRASTEV T, VAN TURNHOUT A, VRIENS E, et al. Long-term follow-up of autologous fat transfer vs conventional breast reconstruction and association with cancer relapse in patients with breast cancer[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(1): 56-63.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3744 |
[20] |
POTTER S, CONROY E J, CUTRESS R I, et al. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(2): 254-266.
doi: S1470-2045(18)30781-2 pmid: 30639093 |
[21] |
LOHMANDER F, LAGERGREN J, JOHANSSON H, et al. Effect of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy with and without acellular dermal matrix among women with breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(10): e2127806.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27806 |
[22] |
DIKMANS R E, NEGENBORN V L, BOUMAN M B, et al. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18(2): 251-258.
doi: S1470-2045(16)30668-4 pmid: 28012977 |
[23] |
RYU J M, KIM J Y, CHOI H J, et al. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: an initial experience of the Korea robot-endoscopy minimal access breast surgery study group (KoREa-BSG)[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 275(5): 985-991.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004492 |
[24] |
JAGSI R, MOMOH A O, QI J, et al. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2018, 110(2): 157-165.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx148 |
[25] |
HART S E, BROWN D L, KIM H M, et al. Association of clinical complications of chemotherapy and patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction[J]. JAMA Surg, 2021, 156(9): 847-855.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2239 pmid: 34160601 |
[26] |
OLSEN M A, NICKEL K B, FOX I K, et al. Comparison of wound complications after immediate, delayed, and secondary breast reconstruction procedures[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(9): e172338.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2338 |
[27] |
CHO M J, HADDOCK N T, GASSMAN A A, et al. Use of composite arterial and venous grafts in microsurgical breast reconstruction: technical challenges and lessons learned[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142(4): 867-870.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004730 |
[28] |
ENGEL H, LIN C Y, HUANG J J, et al. Outcomes of lymphedema microsurgery for breast cancer-related lymphedema with or without microvascular breast reconstruction[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(6): 1076-1083.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002322 pmid: 28594742 |
[29] |
D'ANGELO A, CINA A, MACRÌ G, et al. Conventional CT versus dedicated CT angiography in DIEP flap planning: a feasibility study[J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(4): 277.
doi: 10.3390/jpm11040277 |
[30] |
CHATTHA A, BUCKNOR A, CHEN A D, et al. Indocyanine green angiography use in breast reconstruction: a national analysis of outcomes and cost in 110 320 patients[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(4): 825-832.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004195 |
[31] |
COHEN W A, MUNDY L R, BALLARD T N, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2016, 69(2): 149-162.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.013 pmid: 26740288 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
沪ICP备12009617
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd