China Oncology ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 686-692.doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.07.006
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Ruoxi(), JI Peng, GONG Yue, CHEN Sheng()
Received:
2023-03-29
Revised:
2023-05-30
Online:
2023-07-30
Published:
2023-08-10
Contact:
CHEN Sheng.
CLC Number:
WANG Ruoxi, JI Peng, GONG Yue, CHEN Sheng. Response rate and clinical outcome of HER2-low breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a single-center retrospective study[J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(7): 686-692.
Tab. 1
Clinicopathological features of patients based on HER2 expression [n (%)]"
Clinicopathological feature | Case | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HER2-0 (N=430) | HER2-low (N=342) | Total | ||
Age/year | 0.377 | |||
<40 | 74 (17.2) | 68 (19.9) | 142 (18.4) | |
40-59 | 296 (68.8) | 236 (69.0) | 532 (68.9) | |
≥60 | 60 (14.0) | 38 (11.1) | 98 (12.7) | |
Menstrual state | 0.666 | |||
Premenopausal | 260 (60.5) | 212 (62.0) | 472 (61.1) | |
Postmenopausal | 170 (39.5) | 130 (38.0) | 300 (38.9) | |
T stage | <0.001 | |||
T2 | 164 (38.1) | 118 (34.5) | 282 (36.5) | |
T3 | 180 (41.9) | 188 (55.0) | 368 (47.7) | |
T4 | 86 (20.0) | 36 (10.5) | 122 (15.8) | |
Lymph node status | 0.934 | |||
- | 102 (23.7) | 82 (24.0) | 184 (23.8) | |
+ | 328 (76.3) | 260 (76.0) | 588 (76.2) | |
HR | <0.001 | |||
- | 130 (30.2) | 150 (43.9) | 280 (36.3) | |
+ | 300 (69.8) | 192 (56.1) | 492 (63.7) | |
Ki-67 proliferation index | 0.016 | |||
<20% | 128 (29.8) | 130 (38.0) | 258 (33.4) | |
≥20% | 302 (70.2) | 212 (62.0) | 514 (66.6) |
Tab. 2
Effect of clinicopathological features on pCR rate"
Clinicopathological feature | Case (N=772) n | pCR n (%) | Univariate P value | Multifactorial P value | OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age/year | 0.891 | 0.832 | - | ||
<40 | 142 | 24 (16.9) | |||
40-59 | 532 | 96 (18.0) | |||
≥60 | 98 | 16 (16.3) | |||
Menstrual state | 0.184 | 0.375 | |||
Premenopausal | 472 | 90 (19.1) | |||
Postmenopausal | 300 | 46 (15.3) | |||
T stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
T2 | 282 | 70 (24.8) | Reference | ||
T3 | 368 | 56 (15.2) | 0.543 (0.363-0.812) | ||
T4 | 122 | 10 (8.2) | 0.274 (0.135-0.558) | ||
Lymph node status | 0.592 | 0.791 | |||
- | 132 | 30 (16.3) | |||
+ | 640 | 106 (18.0) | |||
HR | 0.036 | 0.026 | |||
- | 280 | 60 (21.4) | Reference | ||
+ | 492 | 76 (15.4) | 0.638 (0.429-0.949) | ||
Ki-67 proliferation index | 0.190 | 0.307 | |||
<20% | 258 | 52 (20.2) | Reference | ||
≥20% | 514 | 84 (16.3) | 2.618 (1.456-4.707) | ||
HER2 expression | 0.044 | 0.018 | |||
0 | 430 | 88 (20.5) | Reference | ||
1+ | 206 | 32 (15.5) | 0.640 (0.405-1.010) | ||
2+ | 136 | 16 (11.8) | 0.474 (0.262-0.859) |
[1] |
CHOONG G M, CULLEN G D, O'SULLIVAN C C. Evolving standards of care and new challenges in the management of HER2-positive breast cancer[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(5): 355-374.
doi: 10.3322/caac.v70.5 |
[2] |
WOLFF A C, HAMMOND M E H, ALLISON K H, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(20): 2105-2122.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738 pmid: 29846122 |
[3] |
KROP I E, LORUSSO P, MILLER K D, et al. A phase Ⅱ study of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer who were previously treated with trastuzumab, lapatinib, an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(26): 3234-3241.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5902 |
[4] |
BASELGA J, LEWIS PHILLIPS G D, VERMA S, et al. Relationship between tumor biomarkers and efficacy in EMILIA, a phase Ⅲ study of trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2016, 22(15): 3755-3763.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2499 |
[5] |
KIM S B, WILDIERS H, KROP I E, et al. Relationship between tumor biomarkers and efficacy in TH3RESA, a phase Ⅲ study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) vs treatment of physician’s choice in previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, 139(10): 2336-2342.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.v139.10 |
[6] |
LEE C K, DAVIES L, GEBSKI V J, et al. Serum human epidermal growth factor 2 extracellular domain as a predictive biomarker for lapatinib treatment efficacy in patients with advanced breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(9): 936-944.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4767 pmid: 26811533 |
[7] |
MODI S N, JACOT W, YAMASHITA T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 387(1): 9-20.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203690 |
[8] |
HORTOBAGYI G N. Comprehensive management of locally advanced breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 1990, 66(6 Suppl): 1387-1391.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:14+<1387::aid-cncr2820661414>3.0.co;2-i pmid: 2205369 |
[9] |
SCHWARTZ G F, HORTOBAGYI G N. Proceedings of the consensus conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the breast, April 26-28, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania[J]. Cancer, 2004, 100(12): 2512-2532.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.20298 pmid: 15197792 |
[10] | Expert group of expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China edition. Expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China (2021 edition)[J]. China Oncol, 2022, 32(1): 80-89. |
[11] |
《中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识2022年版》专家组. 中国乳腺癌新辅助治疗专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(1): 80-89.
doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2022.01.011 |
Expert group of expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China (2022 edition). Expert consensus on neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer in China (2022 edition)[J]. China Oncol, 2022, 32(1): 80-89. | |
[12] |
MODI S N, SAURA C, YAMASHITA T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(7): 610-621.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914510 |
[13] |
TAKEGAWA N, TSURUTANI J, KAWAKAMI H, et al. Fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan, antitumor activity is dependent on HER2 expression level rather than on HER2 amplification[J]. Int J Cancer, 2019, 145(12): 3414-3424.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.v145.12 |
[14] | PRAT A, BARDIA A, CURIGLIANO G, et al. An overview of clinical development of agents for metastatic or advanced breast cancer without ERBB2 amplification (HER2-low)[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2022. [Online ahead of print]. |
[15] |
DENKERT C, SEITHER F, SCHNEEWEISS A, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of individual patient data from four prospective, neoadjuvant clinical trials[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(8): 1151-1161.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00301-6 pmid: 34252375 |
[16] | 易巧, 左怀全. HER2低表达乳腺癌的临床病理学特征及其新辅助化疗疗效的相关影响因素分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2022, 29(9): 1213-1219. |
YI Q, ZUO H Q. Clinicopathological features of breast cancer with low HER2 expression and analysis of factors related to the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Chin J Bases Clin Gen Surg, 2022, 29(9): 1213-1219. | |
[17] |
SCHETTINI F, CHIC N, BRASÓ-MARISTANY F, et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer[J]. NPJ Breast Cancer, 2021, 7(1): 1.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-00208-2 pmid: 33397968 |
[18] |
HU X E, YANG P, CHEN S H, et al. Clinical and biological heterogeneities in triple-negative breast cancer reveals a non-negligible role of HER2-low[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2023, 25(1): 34.
doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01639-y pmid: 36998014 |
[19] |
MODI S, PARK H, MURTHY R K, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low-expressing advanced breast cancer: results from a phase Ⅰb study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(17): 1887-1896.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02318 |
[20] |
FERNANDEZ A I, LIU M, BELLIZZI A, et al. Examination of low ERBB2 protein expression in breast cancer tissue[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2022, 8(4): 1-4.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7239 pmid: 35113160 |
[21] |
TARANTINO P, HAMILTON E, TOLANEY S M, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: pathological and clinical landscape[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(17): 1951-1962.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02488 pmid: 32330069 |
[1] | SUN Yang, WANG Lian, ZHAO Meng, ZHANG Xiaofeng, GENG Zhijun, WANG Yueyue, SONG Xue, ZUO Lugen, LI Jing, HU Jianguo. The prognostic value of high expression of FKBP1A in gastric cancer and the regulatory effect of targeted PI3K/AKT on glucose metabolism [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(8): 726-739. |
[2] | JIANG Lin, LIU Qiying, JIA Liqing, ZHANG Jing, CHANG Heng, XUE Tian, REN Min, BAI Qianming, ZHU Xiaoli, ZHOU Xiaoyan. Retrospective study on MGMT methylation status and its clinical significance in gliomas [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(8): 740-750. |
[3] | KANG Yinnan, CHEN Shun, XIE Youcheng, ZHENG Ying, HE Yujing, LI Chuyi, YU Xiaohui. Application and research progress of antibody drug conjugates in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(8): 790-800. |
[4] | YANG Zhongyi, XU Xiaoping, WANG Mingwei, ZHANG Yongping, YANG Jianwei, CHEN Yue, XU Wengui, LI Yaming, ZHANG Yingjian, SONG Shaoli. The specification and use of 18F-FES PET in breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(8): 801-808. |
[5] | WU Siyu, LI Junjie, SHAO Zhimin. Development history and research progress of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 551-559. |
[6] | BI Zhao, WANG Yongsheng. New concept of de-escalation management strategy in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 560-565. |
[7] | ZHAO Qian, LING Yunxiao, LIU Guangyu. Recent advances and perspectives in the application of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients underwent breast-conserving surgery [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 566-573. |
[8] | CONG Binbin, CAO Xiaoshan, WANG Chuanjian, QIU Pengfei, SUN Xiao, CHEN Peng, LIU Yanbing, ZHAO Tong, ZHANG Zhaopeng, SHI Zhiqiang, BI Zhao, WANG Yongsheng. Feasibility analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer with axilla negative evaluation by physical examination but suspicious lymph nodes finding on preoperative imaging and metastasis confirmed with biopsy [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 574-580. |
[9] | REN Hengyu, HAO Shuang, CHEN Jiajian, YANG Benlong, CAO Ayong, LIU Guangyu, SHAO Zhimin, WU Jiong. Current status and focus of breast reconstruction research in China and abroad: a bibliometric study [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(6): 581-588. |
[10] | CHEN Luyan, WANG Lixue, FU Peifen. The value of surgery in the patients with de novo stage Ⅳ breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(5): 431-436. |
[11] | ZUO Xueliang, CHEN Zhiqiang, DONG Runyu, WANG Zhixiong, CAI Juan. The value of combined detection of LDHA and PD-L1 in predicting the efficacy and prognosis of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitor [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(5): 460-468. |
[12] | YANG Wenxiao, GUO Linwei, LING Hong, HU Xin. Characterization of immune microenvironment identifies prognostic and immunotherapy benefit for trastuzumab-based therapy [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(5): 484-498. |
[13] | CHEN Junyao, ZHANG Wentao, LIU Qiao, NIE Jianyun. Clinical dilemma and systemic treatment strategy of triple-negative breast cancer in the elderly [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(5): 506-516. |
[14] | CHEN Hong, CHEN Junxia. Effect of hsa_circ_0001573 on biological behaviors of breast cancer cells and its molecular mechanism [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(4): 342-353. |
[15] | BI Zhao, CHEN Peng, QIU Pengfei, CHEN Yuguang, WANG Yongsheng. The analysis of axillary lymph nodes metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer [J]. China Oncology, 2023, 33(4): 361-367. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
沪ICP备12009617
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd